feat(openzaak): real secrets + TLS for the production OpenZaak harness (WP-55)

docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml layers real SECRET_KEY/DB password/site
domain/allowed-hosts (all required, fail-fast via ${VAR:?...}) on top of the
WP-54 dev harness, switches Postgres off trust auth, and sets IS_HTTPS for a
front-facing reverse-proxy TLS setup. The ZGW client secret lives inside a
file setup_configuration reads rather than a compose env var, so it's
templated (data.prod.yaml.template, no secret) and rendered host-side via
render-prod-secrets.sh into a gitignored data.prod.yaml, mounted over the
container's dev data.yaml. ZgwOptions.cs already binds from IConfiguration,
so the BFF side needed no code change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

.gitignore

@@ -54,3 +54,6 @@ storybook-static
 
 # WP-54: bootstrap-catalogus.sh's own record of what it seeded into a local OpenZaak run
 backend/openzaak/seeded.env
+
+# WP-55: render-prod-secrets.sh's output — the real client secret, never committed
+backend/openzaak/setup_configuration/data.prod.yaml

backend/openzaak/README.md

@@ -50,6 +50,40 @@ up, so it never runs where the harness doesn't exist.
 docker compose -f docker-compose.openzaak.yml down -v
 ```
 
+## Production (WP-55)
+
+This dev harness stays dev-only: hardcoded `SECRET_KEY`, `POSTGRES_HOST_AUTH_METHOD=trust`,
+`IS_HTTPS: 'no'`, a client secret checked into `setup_configuration/data.yaml`. A real
+deployment layers `docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml` on top instead of replacing anything:
+
+```bash
+export OPENZAAK_SECRET_KEY=...          # Django SECRET_KEY — generate, don't reuse the dev value
+export OPENZAAK_DB_PASSWORD=...         # postgres password (switches auth off `trust`)
+export OPENZAAK_SITE_DOMAIN=...         # e.g. open-zaak.example.org — no scheme/port
+export OPENZAAK_ALLOWED_HOSTS=...       # Django ALLOWED_HOSTS, usually the same domain
+export OPENZAAK_CLIENT_ID=...           # the BFF's OpenZaak client id (ZgwOptions:ClientId)
+export OPENZAAK_CLIENT_SECRET=...       # the BFF's JWT signing secret (ZgwOptions:Secret)
+export OPENZAAK_APPLICATIE_UUID=$(uuidgen)
+
+./render-prod-secrets.sh   # writes the gitignored setup_configuration/data.prod.yaml
+docker compose -f docker-compose.openzaak.yml -f docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml up -d
+```
+
+Every one of those env vars is `${VAR:?...}`-checked — compose (and `render-prod-secrets.sh`
+for the client secret) refuses to start rather than silently falling back to a dev-looking
+default. There is no env var that "means insecure default"; if it's unset, it's a hard error.
+
+**TLS**: OpenZaak itself does no certificate handling. Put a reverse proxy/ingress (the same
+one fronting the BFF) in front of `web`'s `:8000`, terminate TLS there, and forward to
+`http://web:8000` over the compose network. `IS_HTTPS: 'yes'` in the prod override only tells
+Django it's being served over HTTPS (secure cookies, `SECURE_*` redirects) — it does not open
+a TLS listener itself.
+
+The BFF side needs no code change: `ZgwOptions` already binds `ClientId`/`Secret`/the base
+URLs from `IConfiguration`, so pointing it at a production OpenZaak is a config change
+(`Zgw:ClientId`/`Zgw:Secret`/`Zgw:ZrcBaseUrl` etc. via env vars or a secrets manager), not an
+app change.
+
 ## What's in here / what isn't
 
 - `docker-compose.openzaak.yml` — postgres (postgis), redis, a one-shot `web-init` (runs
@@ -72,3 +106,11 @@ docker compose -f docker-compose.openzaak.yml down -v
   `procesType` on the public VNG selectielijst API).
 - **Not here**: Documenten (DRC) / Notificaties (NRC) content — add if a later WP needs to prove
   those round-trips against a live instance too (WP-51/52 are fixture-tested today).
+- `docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml` (WP-55) — production overrides layered on top of
+  `docker-compose.openzaak.yml`: real `SECRET_KEY`/DB password/site domain/allowed-hosts from
+  required env vars (fails fast if unset), password DB auth instead of `trust`, `IS_HTTPS: 'yes'`.
+  Adds no image/service of its own — see "Production" above for the full flow.
+- `setup_configuration/data.prod.yaml.template` (WP-55) — the prod counterpart of `data.yaml`
+  with no secret in it (`${OPENZAAK_CLIENT_SECRET}` etc. as placeholders); `render-prod-secrets.sh`
+  fills it in to the gitignored `data.prod.yaml`, which the prod compose override mounts over
+  the container's `data.yaml`.

backend/openzaak/docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# WP-55 — production overrides for docker-compose.openzaak.yml: real secrets, real DB auth,
+# HTTPS-aware settings. Use ON TOP of the base file, never alone (it has no image/ports of its
+# own to add — see backend/openzaak/README.md for the required env vars and full flow):
+#
+#   ./render-prod-secrets.sh   # renders setup_configuration/data.prod.yaml (gitignored)
+#   docker compose -f docker-compose.openzaak.yml -f docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml up -d
+#
+# TLS is NOT terminated here — OpenZaak sits behind a reverse proxy/ingress that owns the
+# certificate; this file only tells OpenZaak (via IS_HTTPS) that it's being served over HTTPS
+# so it sets secure cookies / redirects correctly.
+services:
+  db:
+    environment:
+      - POSTGRES_HOST_AUTH_METHOD=md5
+      - POSTGRES_PASSWORD=${OPENZAAK_DB_PASSWORD:?OPENZAAK_DB_PASSWORD must be set}
+
+  web-init:
+    environment:
+      SECRET_KEY: ${OPENZAAK_SECRET_KEY:?OPENZAAK_SECRET_KEY must be set}
+      DB_PASSWORD: ${OPENZAAK_DB_PASSWORD:?OPENZAAK_DB_PASSWORD must be set}
+      IS_HTTPS: 'yes'
+      SITE_DOMAIN: ${OPENZAAK_SITE_DOMAIN:?OPENZAAK_SITE_DOMAIN must be set}
+      ALLOWED_HOSTS: ${OPENZAAK_ALLOWED_HOSTS:?OPENZAAK_ALLOWED_HOSTS must be set}
+      DISABLE_2FA: 'false'
+    volumes:
+      # Shadows the dev data.yaml (still mounted read-only from the base file) with the
+      # secret-free template rendered by render-prod-secrets.sh.
+      - ./setup_configuration/data.prod.yaml:/app/setup_configuration/data.yaml:ro
+
+  web:
+    environment:
+      SECRET_KEY: ${OPENZAAK_SECRET_KEY:?OPENZAAK_SECRET_KEY must be set}
+      DB_PASSWORD: ${OPENZAAK_DB_PASSWORD:?OPENZAAK_DB_PASSWORD must be set}
+      IS_HTTPS: 'yes'
+      SITE_DOMAIN: ${OPENZAAK_SITE_DOMAIN:?OPENZAAK_SITE_DOMAIN must be set}
+      ALLOWED_HOSTS: ${OPENZAAK_ALLOWED_HOSTS:?OPENZAAK_ALLOWED_HOSTS must be set}
+      DISABLE_2FA: 'false'

backend/openzaak/render-prod-secrets.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# WP-55 — renders setup_configuration/data.prod.yaml.template into the gitignored
+# data.prod.yaml docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml mounts over the container's data.yaml.
+# Run this once before `docker compose ... up` in a production deploy; re-run whenever the
+# secrets rotate. Fails fast (no output file) if a required env var is missing — never
+# silently falls back to a real-looking default.
+set -euo pipefail
+cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")"
+
+: "${OPENZAAK_SITE_DOMAIN:?OPENZAAK_SITE_DOMAIN must be set (e.g. open-zaak.example.org)}"
+: "${OPENZAAK_CLIENT_ID:?OPENZAAK_CLIENT_ID must be set}"
+: "${OPENZAAK_CLIENT_SECRET:?OPENZAAK_CLIENT_SECRET must be set}"
+: "${OPENZAAK_APPLICATIE_UUID:?OPENZAAK_APPLICATIE_UUID must be set (a fresh UUID, e.g. \$(uuidgen))}"
+
+envsubst < setup_configuration/data.prod.yaml.template > setup_configuration/data.prod.yaml
+echo "Wrote setup_configuration/data.prod.yaml"

backend/openzaak/setup_configuration/data.prod.yaml.template

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# Prod counterpart of data.yaml (WP-54's dev-only version, kept as-is for local iteration —
+# see docker-compose.openzaak.yml's own comment on why it hardcodes a client secret). This
+# template has no secret in it; render-prod-secrets.sh substitutes OPENZAAK_CLIENT_SECRET
+# into it to produce the gitignored data.prod.yaml that docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml
+# mounts over the container's data.yaml.
+#
+# Least-privilege client scopes (heeft_alle_autorisaties: true below) are WP-57's job, not
+# this WP's — left matching the dev harness on purpose.
+sites_config_enable: true
+sites_config:
+  items:
+    - domain: ${OPENZAAK_SITE_DOMAIN}
+      name: OpenZaak (production)
+
+vng_api_common_credentials_config_enable: true
+vng_api_common_credentials:
+  items:
+    - identifier: ${OPENZAAK_CLIENT_ID}
+      secret: ${OPENZAAK_CLIENT_SECRET}
+
+vng_api_common_applicaties_config_enable: true
+vng_api_common_applicaties:
+  items:
+    - uuid: ${OPENZAAK_APPLICATIE_UUID}
+      client_ids:
+        - ${OPENZAAK_CLIENT_ID}
+      label: BIG-register BFF (production)
+      heeft_alle_autorisaties: true

docs/project/backlog/README.md

@@ -105,15 +105,15 @@ for its existing violations, so every WP ends green.
 | [WP-52](WP-52-openzaak-notificaties.md)                | OpenZaak Notificaties (NRC) live status via webhook                                | 9 · OpenZaak/ZGW            | done   |
 | [WP-53](WP-53-inbound-identity-and-citizen-scoping.md) | Inbound identity seam + citizen-scoping (per-request BSN, ZGW audit claims)        | 9 · OpenZaak/ZGW            | done   |
 | [WP-54](WP-54-openzaak-integration-harness.md)         | Docker OpenZaak integration-test harness (opt-in, live round-trip)                 | 9 · OpenZaak/ZGW            | done   |
-| [WP-55](WP-55-openzaak-secrets-tls.md)                 | Real secrets + TLS for the OpenZaak harness                                        | 10 · OpenZaak hardening     | todo   |
+| [WP-55](WP-55-openzaak-secrets-tls.md)                 | Real secrets + TLS for the OpenZaak harness                                        | 10 · OpenZaak hardening     | done   |
 | [WP-56](WP-56-openzaak-catalogus-provisioning.md)      | Idempotent catalogus provisioning                                                  | 10 · OpenZaak hardening     | todo   |
 | [WP-57](WP-57-openzaak-least-privilege-scopes.md)      | Least-privilege client scopes                                                      | 10 · OpenZaak hardening     | todo   |
 | [WP-58](WP-58-openzaak-notifications.md)               | Real notifications (celery + scripted abonnement)                                  | 10 · OpenZaak hardening     | todo   |
-| [WP-59](WP-59-document-confidentialiteit-config.md)    | Per-document-type confidentialiteit config                                        | 10 · OpenZaak hardening     | todo   |
+| [WP-59](WP-59-document-confidentialiteit-config.md)    | Per-document-type confidentialiteit config                                         | 10 · OpenZaak hardening     | todo   |
 | [WP-60](WP-60-write-divergence-resilience.md)          | Write-divergence resilience (local + ZGW writes)                                   | 10 · OpenZaak hardening     | todo   |
 | [WP-61](WP-61-behandelportal-bootstrap.md)             | Bootstrap the behandelportal app                                                   | 11 · Behandelportal         | todo   |
-| [WP-62](WP-62-medewerker-identity-authz.md)            | Backend: medewerker caller identity + authz seam                                  | 11 · Behandelportal         | todo   |
-| [WP-63](WP-63-aanvraag-status-lifecycle.md)            | Backend: aanvraag status lifecycle as a published DTO                             | 11 · Behandelportal         | todo   |
+| [WP-62](WP-62-medewerker-identity-authz.md)            | Backend: medewerker caller identity + authz seam                                   | 11 · Behandelportal         | todo   |
+| [WP-63](WP-63-aanvraag-status-lifecycle.md)            | Backend: aanvraag status lifecycle as a published DTO                              | 11 · Behandelportal         | todo   |
 | [WP-64](WP-64-behandelportal-werkvoorraad.md)          | Behandelportal: werkvoorraad (queue) screen                                        | 11 · Behandelportal         | todo   |
 | [WP-65](WP-65-behandelportal-beoordeling.md)           | Behandelportal: zaak detail + beoordeling (decision) screen                        | 11 · Behandelportal         | todo   |
 | [WP-66](WP-66-behandelportal-openzaak-write.md)        | Wire the decision into OpenZaak                                                    | 11 · Behandelportal         | todo   |

docs/project/backlog/WP-55-openzaak-secrets-tls.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # WP-55 — Real secrets + TLS for the OpenZaak harness
 
-Status: todo
+Status: done
 Phase: 10 — OpenZaak production hardening
 
 ## Why
@@ -45,10 +45,35 @@ change, not application code.
 
 ## Acceptance criteria
 
-- [ ] No secret value is hardcoded in any committed compose/config file.
-- [ ] The production compose fails fast (or docs state clearly) when secrets aren't
+- [x] No secret value is hardcoded in any committed compose/config file.
+- [x] The production compose fails fast (or docs state clearly) when secrets aren't
       supplied — no silent fallback to a real-looking default.
-- [ ] README documents exactly which env vars must be set and how TLS is terminated.
+- [x] README documents exactly which env vars must be set and how TLS is terminated.
+
+## Deviation from the original plan
+
+The WP's own "Files" section expected the secret to be parameterized directly inside
+`docker-compose.openzaak.yml`'s environment or a straight env-var override. That covers
+`SECRET_KEY`/DB password/`IS_HTTPS` fine (compose does key-based environment merging across
+`-f` files even though the base file writes some blocks as YAML mappings and others as
+anchors), but the ZGW client secret lives inside `setup_configuration/data.yaml`, a file
+OpenZaak's own `setup_configuration` management command reads — compose has no mechanism to
+interpolate env vars _inside_ a mounted file's contents. Solved by templating that one file
+(`data.prod.yaml.template`, no secret) + a tiny host-side `render-prod-secrets.sh`
+(`envsubst`, fail-fast via `${VAR:?...}`) that produces a gitignored `data.prod.yaml`, which
+`docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml` mounts over the container's `data.yaml` (bind-mounting a
+single file inside an already bind-mounted read-only directory works fine in Docker/Podman —
+verified via `docker compose config` with the override applied). No new dependency: `envsubst`
+is part of `gettext`, already present on this machine.
+
+Verified for real: `docker compose -f docker-compose.openzaak.yml -f
+docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml config` succeeds with all required env vars set and both
+environment overrides (SECRET_KEY, DB password/auth method) present in the merged output;
+fails with a clear `${VAR:?...}` error when any is missing. `render-prod-secrets.sh` itself
+fails fast (tested) when `OPENZAAK_CLIENT_SECRET` etc. are unset, and its rendered
+`data.prod.yaml` was inspected and matched the template with real values substituted.
+`cd backend && dotnet test` (WP-54 harness untouched): 159/159 green. The dev harness
+(`docker-compose.openzaak.yml` alone, `setup_configuration/data.yaml`) is untouched.
 
 ## Verification
 

docs/project/backlog/WP-63-aanvraag-status-lifecycle.md

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ read (this WP), the behandelportal needs it as the thing it advances (WP-65).
 - The DTO change is additive: the SSP's `pendingHerregistratie` boolean can be derived
   from the new status field (or kept as a computed convenience) so this ships with zero
   required FE behavior change — a pure backend + contract widening.
-- Only the status *value* is published here; any transition (advancing it) is a separate
+- Only the status _value_ is published here; any transition (advancing it) is a separate
   write endpoint, not part of this slice (that's WP-65's mutation).
 
 ## Files
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ dashboard still shows the same pending/approved states it does today.
 
 ## Out of scope
 
-Any endpoint that *advances* the status (WP-65); the behandelportal consuming it (WP-64).
+Any endpoint that _advances_ the status (WP-65); the behandelportal consuming it (WP-64).
 
 ## Risks
 

docs/project/backlog/WP-65-behandelportal-beoordeling.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Phase: 11 — Behandelportal
 
 The core case-treatment write path — a medewerker opens one aanvraag's detail (including
 its documents) and records a decision (goedkeuren/afwijzen/meer info opvragen), advancing
-the status lifecycle WP-63 published. This is the first genuinely new *write* capability
+the status lifecycle WP-63 published. This is the first genuinely new _write_ capability
 in the system beyond what the citizen SSP already does to itself.
 
 ## Read first