docs: refactoring-backlog workspace — baseline + 3 Phase 1 agents

Runs the multi-agent refactoring-backlog pipeline in docs/project/
refactor-backlog-setup/ up to and including three of the seven Phase 1
agents.

00-baseline.md establishes the metrics every later agent must cite, using
only tooling already in the repo (vitest lcov, coverlet cobertura, ESLint's
core `complexity` rule at threshold 0 for a full distribution, depcruise
--metrics). Duplication and C# complexity had no tooling, so
tools/baseline-scan.mjs adds a deterministic ~200-line text scan rather
than a new dependency; the approximations are labelled as such.

Headline: FE 75.1% line coverage but only over the 98 of 220 source files a
spec loads; BE 97.6% line / 79.6% branch; 0 layering violations; 7.1%
duplication; 25 of 2085 TS functions over CC 10.

Then 02-testability, 04-cqrs-light and 06-adr-conformance (27 findings).
01/03/05 were skipped deliberately — the baseline shows little for them to
find; 07 (BIO2) and 08 (consolidation) are still open.

Each agent corrected a baseline observation of mine, and in every case the
error was in something derived rather than measured:

- BL-007 counted ~13 adapter "mutations" from the `runSubmit` helper name;
  5 of those call sites are reads. It also missed 3 real mutations that
  reach the raw ApiClient and never return a Result.
- BL-002 diagnosed the 100%-duplicated auth folders as ADR-0002's
  divergence prediction failing. It never had a chance to fail: §3's
  `Principal` union was never built.
- BL-004 named libs/shared/domain and libs/beheer/contracts as coverage
  gaps; both are pure type declarations where 0% is unimprovable.

All three corrections are recorded inline in 00-baseline.md §10, so agent
08 does not inherit the bad numbers.

.prettierignore excludes the agent prompt directories — reflowing their
markdown would edit the prompt text itself.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/project/refactor-backlog-setup/refactor-backlog/final-prompts/01-readability.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+MODEL: Opus
+OUTPUT FILE: /refactor-backlog/01-readability.md
+DEPENDS ON: 00-baseline.md (complete)
+
+---
+
+PERSISTENCE & RESUME PROTOCOL
+
+Before starting work:
+1. Read /refactor-backlog/_status.md. If your row says "complete", stop — do not re-run.
+2. If "in_progress", read your own output file. Treat modules already listed as done.
+   Resume from "Last module processed" + 1.
+3. If "not_started", confirm your dependencies show "complete" in _status.md. If not,
+   stop and report a blocking dependency instead of guessing.
+
+While working:
+4. Append findings incrementally, one module at a time. After each module, update
+   _status.md: "Last module processed" and "Last updated".
+5. Each finding gets a stable ID (e.g. RD-014) that never changes across runs.
+6. If interrupted, the file + status row is the full recovery state.
+
+On completion:
+7. Mark your _status.md row "complete" only once every module in scope has a
+   corresponding section in your output file.
+
+Every output file starts with:
+## Scope: [modules covered]
+## Status: [not_started | in_progress | complete]
+## Last updated: [timestamp]
+## Depends on: [file(s)]
+## ---
+
+AGENT: Readability Agent
+
+Junior = fluency in language constructs, not domain knowledge. Assume familiarity
+with generics, async/await, LINQ, DI, RxJS operators, TS type system — do NOT flag
+idiomatic use of these as "unreadable". Flag only: unclear naming, methods/components
+exceeding [N] lines, nesting >3 levels, magic values, misleading types, missing guard
+clauses. Cite baseline complexity score per finding.