feat(brief): WP-18 — ABAC capability spine (PRD-0002 phase P1)

Replace the FE-computed authorization anti-pattern in BriefStore.editable
(derived from the unverified X-Role header) with server-computed decision
flags, mirroring the existing HerregistratieDecisionsDto pattern:

- Backend: Authz.cs is the single authorization helper — the SAME check
  (Authz.CanActOn) both gates BriefStore.Review's mutations and computes
  the BriefDecisionsDto flags shipped on every brief response, so emit
  and enforce can never drift. New GET /me returns coarse, role-derived
  capabilities (PRD-0002 SS6).
- Every brief endpoint (including send, previously ungated on HttpContext)
  now returns a fresh BriefViewDto so decisions never go stale after a
  mutation.
- FE: brief.store.ts reads canEdit/canApprove/canReject/canSend off the
  loaded decisions instead of computing them from currentRole(); the
  brief.machine carries decisions through every status transition.
- New shared/domain/capability.ts + shared/application/access.store.ts +
  shared/infrastructure/me.adapter.ts: the general capability-spine
  infrastructure (AccessStore.can(), capabilityGuard) for future routes.

Deviates from the original WP-18 draft by NOT renaming auth/domain's
Session to a Principal union — ADR-0002 explicitly defers that refactor
until a second actor exists, and the brief workflow's drafter/approver
identity turned out to be a separate axis from the SSP login session
entirely. See docs/backlog/WP-18-abac-capability-spine.md for the full
as-built record.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Contracts/Dtos.cs

@@ -147,7 +147,14 @@ public sealed record BriefDto(
     IReadOnlyList<LetterSectionDto> Sections,
     BriefStatusDto Status, string DrafterId);
 
-public sealed record BriefViewDto(BriefDto Brief, IReadOnlyList<LibraryPassageDto> AvailablePassages);
+// Decision flags for the CURRENT acting principal + this brief's live status
+// (PRD-0002 phase P1) — the FE renders these, it never recomputes them.
+public sealed record BriefDecisionsDto(bool CanEdit, bool CanApprove, bool CanReject, bool CanSend);
+
+public sealed record BriefViewDto(BriefDto Brief, IReadOnlyList<LibraryPassageDto> AvailablePassages, BriefDecisionsDto Decisions);
 
 public sealed record SaveBriefRequest(IReadOnlyList<LetterSectionDto> Sections);
 public sealed record RejectBriefRequest(string Comments);
+
+// PRD-0002 §6: coarse, role-derived capabilities for nav/menu-level checks.
+public sealed record MeDto(IReadOnlyList<string> Capabilities);

backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Data/BriefStore.cs

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 using BigRegister.Api.Contracts;
+using BigRegister.Domain.Authorization;
 
 namespace BigRegister.Api.Data;
 
@@ -72,11 +73,13 @@ public static class BriefStore
     }
   }
 
-  public static (Outcome, BriefEntity?) Approve(string owner, string actingId, string at) =>
+  public static (Outcome, BriefEntity?) Approve(string owner, Principal principal, string at) =>
-      Review(owner, actingId, e => new BriefStatusDto("approved", ApprovedBy: actingId, ApprovedAt: at));
+      Review(owner, principal, BriefAction.Approve, () =>
+          new BriefStatusDto("approved", ApprovedBy: Authz.ActingId(principal), ApprovedAt: at));
 
-  public static (Outcome, BriefEntity?) Reject(string owner, string actingId, string comments, string at) =>
+  public static (Outcome, BriefEntity?) Reject(string owner, Principal principal, string comments, string at) =>
-      Review(owner, actingId, e => new BriefStatusDto("rejected", RejectedBy: actingId, RejectedAt: at, Comments: comments));
+      Review(owner, principal, BriefAction.Reject, () =>
+          new BriefStatusDto("rejected", RejectedBy: Authz.ActingId(principal), RejectedAt: at, Comments: comments));
 
   public static (Outcome, BriefEntity?) Send(string owner, string at)
   {
@@ -109,15 +112,18 @@ public static class BriefStore
   }
 
   // Approve/reject share the guard: must be submitted, and the approver must differ
-  // from the drafter (a drafter cannot approve their own letter).
+  // from the drafter (a drafter cannot approve their own letter). The SoD check is
-  private static (Outcome, BriefEntity?) Review(string owner, string actingId, Func<BriefEntity, BriefStatusDto> next)
+  // Authz.CanActOn — the SAME check the screen DTO's decision flags use — checked
+  // BEFORE the status guard so Forbidden vs Conflict ordering matches the old
+  // inline check exactly.
+  private static (Outcome, BriefEntity?) Review(string owner, Principal principal, BriefAction action, Func<BriefStatusDto> next)
   {
     lock (_gate)
     {
       if (!_byOwner.TryGetValue(owner, out var e)) return (Outcome.Conflict, null);
-      if (actingId == e.DrafterId) return (Outcome.Forbidden, null);
+      if (!Authz.CanActOn(action, principal, e.DrafterId)) return (Outcome.Forbidden, null);
       if (e.Status.Tag != "submitted") return (Outcome.Conflict, null);
-      e.Status = next(e);
+      e.Status = next();
       return (Outcome.Ok, e);
     }
   }

backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Domain/Authorization/Authz.cs

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+using BigRegister.Api.Contracts;
+using BigRegister.Api.Data;
+
+namespace BigRegister.Domain.Authorization;
+
+public enum PrincipalRole { Drafter, Approver }
+
+/// <summary>
+/// The acting identity for this request. dev stub — NOT a security boundary: resolved
+/// from the client-asserted X-Role header (mirrors the FE's `?role=` toggle). A real
+/// system builds this from verified AD/OIDC claims (PRD-0002 §3, §7); everything else
+/// in this file — the capability model, the single Authz.Can check both emitting and
+/// enforcing — carries over unchanged once that swap happens.
+/// </summary>
+public sealed record Principal(PrincipalRole Role);
+
+public enum BriefAction { Approve, Reject, Send }
+
+/// <summary>
+/// Single source of truth for brief authorization (PRD-0002 phase P1). The SAME
+/// check both computes the decision flags shipped on the screen DTO (emit) and
+/// gates the mutation endpoints (enforce) — so the two can never drift, closing the
+/// classic broken-object-level-authorization gap (PRD-0002 §7).
+/// </summary>
+public static class Authz
+{
+  public static Principal ResolvePrincipal(HttpContext ctx) =>
+      new(ctx.Request.Headers["X-Role"].ToString() == "approver" ? PrincipalRole.Approver : PrincipalRole.Drafter);
+
+  public static string ActingId(Principal principal) =>
+      principal.Role == PrincipalRole.Approver ? BriefStore.ApproverId : BriefStore.DrafterId;
+
+  /// Coarse, resource-independent capabilities for `GET /me` (nav/menu-level — NOT
+  /// tied to any specific brief's live status; contrast Decisions below).
+  public static IReadOnlyList<string> RoleCapabilities(Principal principal) =>
+      principal.Role == PrincipalRole.Approver
+          ? new[] { "brief:approve", "brief:reject", "brief:send" }
+          : Array.Empty<string>();
+
+  /// Role + four-eyes (SoD) check only — no status. This is the exact check
+  /// BriefStore.Review enforces before its status guard; kept separate from
+  /// Decisions() below so enforcement ORDER (Forbidden before Conflict) matches
+  /// today's behavior exactly.
+  public static bool CanActOn(BriefAction action, Principal principal, string drafterId) => action switch
+  {
+    BriefAction.Approve or BriefAction.Reject => ActingId(principal) != drafterId,
+    BriefAction.Send => true, // sending is a mechanical dispatch step, not role-gated today
+    _ => false,
+  };
+
+  /// Resource-aware decision for the screen DTO: "would this action succeed right
+  /// now" — role/SoD AND the brief's current status. This is what the UI renders;
+  /// it never re-derives these booleans itself.
+  public static BriefDecisionsDto Decisions(Principal principal, string status, string drafterId) => new(
+      CanEdit: principal.Role == PrincipalRole.Drafter && status is "draft" or "rejected",
+      CanApprove: CanActOn(BriefAction.Approve, principal, drafterId) && status == "submitted",
+      CanReject: CanActOn(BriefAction.Reject, principal, drafterId) && status == "submitted",
+      CanSend: CanActOn(BriefAction.Send, principal, drafterId) && status == "approved");
+}

backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Program.cs

@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ using System.Text.Json;
 using System.Text.Json.Serialization;
 using BigRegister.Api.Contracts;
 using BigRegister.Api.Data;
+using BigRegister.Domain.Authorization;
 using BigRegister.Domain.Diplomas;
 using BigRegister.Domain.Documents;
 using BigRegister.Domain.Intake;
@@ -239,76 +240,81 @@ api.MapPost("/applications/{id}/submit", (string id, SubmitApplicationRequest re
 .ProducesProblem(StatusCodes.Status409Conflict)
 .Produces(StatusCodes.Status404NotFound);
 
-// --- Brief (letter composition). One demo brief per owner; the server owns the
+// PRD-0002 §6: coarse, role-derived capabilities for nav/menu-level checks (NOT
-// status machine + role rules. Role is a dev-only stand-in via X-Role (mirrors the
+// tied to a specific brief's live status — see BriefDecisionsDto for that).
-// X-Admin seam and the FE ?role= toggle) — no real identities in this POC. ---
+api.MapGet("/me", (HttpContext ctx) => new MeDto(Authz.RoleCapabilities(Authz.ResolvePrincipal(ctx))))
+.Produces<MeDto>();
 
-api.MapGet("/brief", () =>
+// --- Brief (letter composition). One demo brief per owner; the server owns the
+// status machine + authorization (Authz, PRD-0002 phase P1). Principal is a
+// dev-only stand-in via X-Role (mirrors the X-Admin seam and the FE ?role=
+// toggle) — no real identities in this POC. ---
+
+api.MapGet("/brief", (HttpContext ctx) =>
 {
   var e = BriefStore.GetOrCreate(DocumentStore.DemoOwner);
-  return new BriefViewDto(e.ToDto(), BriefSeed.PassagesFor(e.Beroep));
+  return ToView(ctx, e);
 })
 .Produces<BriefViewDto>();
 
 api.MapPut("/brief", (SaveBriefRequest req, HttpContext ctx) =>
 {
-  var (_, isDrafter) = BriefRole(ctx);
+  var isDrafter = Authz.ResolvePrincipal(ctx).Role == PrincipalRole.Drafter;
-  return BriefResult(BriefStore.Save(DocumentStore.DemoOwner, req.Sections, isDrafter), "Alleen de opsteller mag de brief bewerken.");
+  return BriefResult(ctx, BriefStore.Save(DocumentStore.DemoOwner, req.Sections, isDrafter), "Alleen de opsteller mag de brief bewerken.");
 })
-.Produces<BriefDto>()
+.Produces<BriefViewDto>()
 .ProducesProblem(StatusCodes.Status403Forbidden)
 .ProducesProblem(StatusCodes.Status409Conflict);
 
 api.MapPost("/brief/submit", (HttpContext ctx) =>
 {
-  var (_, isDrafter) = BriefRole(ctx);
+  var isDrafter = Authz.ResolvePrincipal(ctx).Role == PrincipalRole.Drafter;
   var r = BriefStore.Submit(DocumentStore.DemoOwner, isDrafter, Now());
   LogBrief("submit", r);
-  return BriefResult(r, "Alleen de opsteller mag indienen.");
+  return BriefResult(ctx, r, "Alleen de opsteller mag indienen.");
 })
 .WithName("briefSubmit") // distinct name so the generated client method isn't `submit2`
-.Produces<BriefDto>()
+.Produces<BriefViewDto>()
 .ProducesProblem(StatusCodes.Status403Forbidden)
 .ProducesProblem(StatusCodes.Status409Conflict);
 
 api.MapPost("/brief/approve", (HttpContext ctx) =>
 {
-  var (acting, _) = BriefRole(ctx);
+  var r = BriefStore.Approve(DocumentStore.DemoOwner, Authz.ResolvePrincipal(ctx), Now());
-  var r = BriefStore.Approve(DocumentStore.DemoOwner, acting, Now());
   LogBrief("approve", r);
-  return BriefResult(r, "De beoordelaar mag niet de opsteller zijn.");
+  return BriefResult(ctx, r, "De beoordelaar mag niet de opsteller zijn.");
 })
-.Produces<BriefDto>()
+.Produces<BriefViewDto>()
 .ProducesProblem(StatusCodes.Status403Forbidden)
 .ProducesProblem(StatusCodes.Status409Conflict);
 
 api.MapPost("/brief/reject", (RejectBriefRequest req, HttpContext ctx) =>
 {
-  var (acting, _) = BriefRole(ctx);
+  var r = BriefStore.Reject(DocumentStore.DemoOwner, Authz.ResolvePrincipal(ctx), req.Comments, Now());
-  var r = BriefStore.Reject(DocumentStore.DemoOwner, acting, req.Comments, Now());
   LogBrief("reject", r);
-  return BriefResult(r, "De beoordelaar mag niet de opsteller zijn.");
+  return BriefResult(ctx, r, "De beoordelaar mag niet de opsteller zijn.");
 })
-.Produces<BriefDto>()
+.Produces<BriefViewDto>()
 .ProducesProblem(StatusCodes.Status403Forbidden)
 .ProducesProblem(StatusCodes.Status409Conflict);
 
-api.MapPost("/brief/send", () =>
+api.MapPost("/brief/send", (HttpContext ctx) =>
 {
   // Send-time placeholder linting is FE-authoritative in this slice (no C# parity
-  // port); the backend only guards the approved→sent transition.
+  // port); the backend only guards the approved→sent transition (not role-gated
+  // today — see Authz.CanActOn(Send, …), a mechanical dispatch step).
   var r = BriefStore.Send(DocumentStore.DemoOwner, Now());
   LogBrief("send", r);
-  return BriefResult(r, "Versturen kan niet in deze status.");
+  return BriefResult(ctx, r, "Versturen kan niet in deze status.");
 })
-.Produces<BriefDto>()
+.Produces<BriefViewDto>()
 .ProducesProblem(StatusCodes.Status409Conflict);
 
-api.MapPost("/brief/reset", () =>
+api.MapPost("/brief/reset", (HttpContext ctx) =>
 {
   // Demo "start over": recreate a fresh draft. No guards — showcase affordance only.
   var e = BriefStore.ResetAndCreate(DocumentStore.DemoOwner);
-  return new BriefViewDto(e.ToDto(), BriefSeed.PassagesFor(e.Beroep));
+  return ToView(ctx, e);
 })
 .WithName("briefReset")
 .Produces<BriefViewDto>();
@@ -319,17 +325,16 @@ static bool IsAdmin(HttpContext ctx) => ctx.Request.Headers["X-Admin"] == "true"
 
 static string Now() => DateTimeOffset.UtcNow.ToString("o");
 
-// Dev-only role stand-in: X-Role: approver acts as the approver identity, anything
+BriefViewDto ToView(HttpContext ctx, BriefEntity e) => new(
-// else (default) acts as the drafter.
+    e.ToDto(),
-static (string acting, bool isDrafter) BriefRole(HttpContext ctx)
+    BriefSeed.PassagesFor(e.Beroep),
-{
+    Authz.Decisions(Authz.ResolvePrincipal(ctx), e.Status.Tag, e.DrafterId));
-  var isDrafter = ctx.Request.Headers["X-Role"].ToString() != "approver";
-  return (isDrafter ? BriefStore.DrafterId : BriefStore.ApproverId, isDrafter);
-}
 
-IResult BriefResult((BriefStore.Outcome outcome, BriefEntity? entity) r, string forbiddenDetail) => r.outcome switch
+// Emit (decision flags, via ToView) and enforce (Forbidden/Conflict below) both run
+// through Authz — see BriefStore.Review and Authz.CanActOn — so they cannot drift.
+IResult BriefResult(HttpContext ctx, (BriefStore.Outcome outcome, BriefEntity? entity) r, string forbiddenDetail) => r.outcome switch
 {
-  BriefStore.Outcome.Ok => Results.Ok(r.entity!.ToDto()),
+  BriefStore.Outcome.Ok => Results.Ok(ToView(ctx, r.entity!)),
   BriefStore.Outcome.Forbidden => Results.Problem(detail: forbiddenDetail, statusCode: StatusCodes.Status403Forbidden),
   _ => Results.Problem(detail: "Ongeldige overgang voor de huidige status van de brief.", statusCode: StatusCodes.Status409Conflict),
 };

backend/swagger.json

@@ -641,6 +641,25 @@
         }
       }
     },
+    "/api/v1/me": {
+      "get": {
+        "tags": [
+          "BigRegister.Api, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null"
+        ],
+        "responses": {
+          "200": {
+            "description": "OK",
+            "content": {
+              "application/json": {
+                "schema": {
+                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/MeDto"
+                }
+              }
+            }
+          }
+        }
+      }
+    },
     "/api/v1/brief": {
       "get": {
         "tags": [
@@ -679,7 +698,7 @@
             "content": {
               "application/json": {
                 "schema": {
-                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefDto"
+                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefViewDto"
                 }
               }
             }
@@ -719,7 +738,7 @@
             "content": {
               "application/json": {
                 "schema": {
-                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefDto"
+                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefViewDto"
                 }
               }
             }
@@ -758,7 +777,7 @@
             "content": {
               "application/json": {
                 "schema": {
-                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefDto"
+                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefViewDto"
                 }
               }
             }
@@ -807,7 +826,7 @@
             "content": {
               "application/json": {
                 "schema": {
-                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefDto"
+                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefViewDto"
                 }
               }
             }
@@ -846,7 +865,7 @@
             "content": {
               "application/json": {
                 "schema": {
-                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefDto"
+                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefViewDto"
                 }
               }
             }
@@ -1030,6 +1049,24 @@
         },
         "additionalProperties": false
       },
+      "BriefDecisionsDto": {
+        "type": "object",
+        "properties": {
+          "canEdit": {
+            "type": "boolean"
+          },
+          "canApprove": {
+            "type": "boolean"
+          },
+          "canReject": {
+            "type": "boolean"
+          },
+          "canSend": {
+            "type": "boolean"
+          }
+        },
+        "additionalProperties": false
+      },
       "BriefDto": {
         "type": "object",
         "properties": {
@@ -1123,6 +1160,9 @@
               "$ref": "#/components/schemas/LibraryPassageDto"
             },
             "nullable": true
+          },
+          "decisions": {
+            "$ref": "#/components/schemas/BriefDecisionsDto"
           }
         },
         "additionalProperties": false
@@ -1469,6 +1509,19 @@
         },
         "additionalProperties": false
       },
+      "MeDto": {
+        "type": "object",
+        "properties": {
+          "capabilities": {
+            "type": "array",
+            "items": {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            "nullable": true
+          }
+        },
+        "additionalProperties": false
+      },
       "ParagraphDto": {
         "type": "object",
         "properties": {

backend/tests/BigRegister.Tests/AuthzTests.cs

@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+using BigRegister.Domain.Authorization;
+using Xunit;
+
+namespace BigRegister.Tests;
+
+/// <summary>
+/// Unit tests for the single authorization helper (PRD-0002 phase P1) that both
+/// computes the brief screen's decision flags and gates the mutation endpoints.
+/// </summary>
+public class AuthzTests
+{
+  private static readonly Principal Drafter = new(PrincipalRole.Drafter);
+  private static readonly Principal Approver = new(PrincipalRole.Approver);
+  private const string DrafterId = "demo-drafter";
+
+  [Fact]
+  public void Drafter_may_not_approve_or_reject_even_when_submitted()
+  {
+    Assert.False(Authz.CanActOn(BriefAction.Approve, Drafter, DrafterId));
+    Assert.False(Authz.CanActOn(BriefAction.Reject, Drafter, DrafterId));
+  }
+
+  [Fact]
+  public void Approver_may_approve_and_reject_a_different_drafters_letter()
+  {
+    Assert.True(Authz.CanActOn(BriefAction.Approve, Approver, DrafterId));
+    Assert.True(Authz.CanActOn(BriefAction.Reject, Approver, DrafterId));
+  }
+
+  [Fact]
+  public void Send_is_not_role_gated()
+  {
+    Assert.True(Authz.CanActOn(BriefAction.Send, Drafter, DrafterId));
+    Assert.True(Authz.CanActOn(BriefAction.Send, Approver, DrafterId));
+  }
+
+  [Theory]
+  [InlineData("draft")]
+  [InlineData("rejected")]
+  public void Decisions_CanEdit_true_for_drafter_in_editable_statuses(string status)
+  {
+    Assert.True(Authz.Decisions(Drafter, status, DrafterId).CanEdit);
+    Assert.False(Authz.Decisions(Approver, status, DrafterId).CanEdit);
+  }
+
+  [Fact]
+  public void Decisions_CanApprove_requires_submitted_status_and_approver_role()
+  {
+    Assert.True(Authz.Decisions(Approver, "submitted", DrafterId).CanApprove);
+    Assert.False(Authz.Decisions(Approver, "draft", DrafterId).CanApprove);
+    Assert.False(Authz.Decisions(Drafter, "submitted", DrafterId).CanApprove);
+  }
+
+  [Fact]
+  public void Decisions_CanSend_requires_approved_status_only()
+  {
+    Assert.True(Authz.Decisions(Drafter, "approved", DrafterId).CanSend);
+    Assert.True(Authz.Decisions(Approver, "approved", DrafterId).CanSend);
+    Assert.False(Authz.Decisions(Approver, "submitted", DrafterId).CanSend);
+  }
+
+  [Fact]
+  public void RoleCapabilities_are_empty_for_drafter_and_the_three_brief_capabilities_for_approver()
+  {
+    Assert.Empty(Authz.RoleCapabilities(Drafter));
+    Assert.Equal(new[] { "brief:approve", "brief:reject", "brief:send" }, Authz.RoleCapabilities(Approver));
+  }
+}

backend/tests/BigRegister.Tests/BriefEndpointTests.cs

@@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ public class BriefEndpointTests(WebApplicationFactory<Program> factory) : IClass
 
     var res = await _client.SendAsync(Post("/api/v1/brief/submit"));
     res.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
-    var submitted = await res.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefDto>();
+    var submitted = await res.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefViewDto>();
-    Assert.Equal("submitted", submitted!.Status.Tag);
+    Assert.Equal("submitted", submitted!.Brief.Status.Tag);
   }
 
   [Fact]
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ public class BriefEndpointTests(WebApplicationFactory<Program> factory) : IClass
 
     var res = await _client.SendAsync(Post("/api/v1/brief/approve", role: "approver"));
     res.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
-    Assert.Equal("approved", (await res.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefDto>())!.Status.Tag);
+    Assert.Equal("approved", (await res.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefViewDto>())!.Brief.Status.Tag);
   }
 
   [Fact]
@@ -117,13 +117,13 @@ public class BriefEndpointTests(WebApplicationFactory<Program> factory) : IClass
     await _client.SendAsync(Post("/api/v1/brief/submit"));
 
     var rejected = await (await _client.SendAsync(
-        Post("/api/v1/brief/reject", role: "approver", body: new RejectBriefRequest("Graag aanvullen.")))).Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefDto>();
+        Post("/api/v1/brief/reject", role: "approver", body: new RejectBriefRequest("Graag aanvullen.")))).Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefViewDto>();
-    Assert.Equal("rejected", rejected!.Status.Tag);
+    Assert.Equal("rejected", rejected!.Brief.Status.Tag);
-    Assert.Equal("Graag aanvullen.", rejected.Status.Comments);
+    Assert.Equal("Graag aanvullen.", rejected.Brief.Status.Comments);
 
     // A drafter save on a rejected letter reopens it to draft.
-    var reopened = await (await _client.PutAsJsonAsync("/api/v1/brief", FilledFrom(brief))).Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefDto>();
+    var reopened = await (await _client.PutAsJsonAsync("/api/v1/brief", FilledFrom(brief))).Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefViewDto>();
-    Assert.Equal("draft", reopened!.Status.Tag);
+    Assert.Equal("draft", reopened!.Brief.Status.Tag);
   }
 
   [Fact]
@@ -139,7 +139,36 @@ public class BriefEndpointTests(WebApplicationFactory<Program> factory) : IClass
     await _client.SendAsync(Post("/api/v1/brief/approve", role: "approver"));
     var res = await _client.SendAsync(Post("/api/v1/brief/send"));
     res.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
-    Assert.Equal("sent", (await res.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefDto>())!.Status.Tag);
+    Assert.Equal("sent", (await res.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefViewDto>())!.Brief.Status.Tag);
+  }
+
+  [Fact]
+  public async Task Decisions_on_the_view_mirror_the_acting_principal_and_live_status()
+  {
+    var brief = await Get();
+    var view = await _client.GetFromJsonAsync<BriefViewDto>("/api/v1/brief");
+    Assert.True(view!.Decisions.CanEdit); // default (no X-Role) = drafter, draft status
+    Assert.False(view.Decisions.CanApprove);
+
+    await _client.PutAsJsonAsync("/api/v1/brief", FilledFrom(brief));
+    await _client.SendAsync(Post("/api/v1/brief/submit"));
+
+    var asApprover = await _client.SendAsync(
+        new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Get, "/api/v1/brief") { Headers = { { "X-Role", "approver" } } });
+    var approverView = await asApprover.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<BriefViewDto>();
+    Assert.True(approverView!.Decisions.CanApprove);
+    Assert.False(approverView.Decisions.CanEdit); // approver never edits
+  }
+
+  [Fact]
+  public async Task Me_returns_no_capabilities_for_drafter_and_the_brief_set_for_approver()
+  {
+    var asDrafter = await _client.GetFromJsonAsync<MeDto>("/api/v1/me");
+    Assert.Empty(asDrafter!.Capabilities);
+
+    var res = await _client.SendAsync(new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Get, "/api/v1/me") { Headers = { { "X-Role", "approver" } } });
+    var asApprover = await res.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<MeDto>();
+    Assert.Equal(new[] { "brief:approve", "brief:reject", "brief:send" }, asApprover!.Capabilities);
   }
 
   [Fact]

docs/backlog/README.md

@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ for its existing violations, so every WP ends green.
 | [WP-15](WP-15-missing-stories.md)       | Missing stories: shell + brief components                    | 3 · Storybook               | todo   |
 | [WP-16](WP-16-component-a11y.md)        | Component a11y: description wiring + alert role              | 4 · a11y                    | todo   |
 | [WP-17](WP-17-app-a11y.md)              | App-level a11y: route focus, template lint, WCAG checklist   | 4 · a11y                    | todo   |
-| [WP-18](WP-18-abac-capability-spine.md) | ABAC capability spine (Principal + capabilities, phase P1)   | 5 · productie-volwassenheid | todo   |
+| [WP-18](WP-18-abac-capability-spine.md) | ABAC capability spine (Principal + capabilities, phase P1)   | 5 · productie-volwassenheid | done   |
 | [WP-19](WP-19-e2e-smoke.md)             | Playwright e2e smoke                                         | 5 · productie-volwassenheid | todo   |
 | [WP-20](WP-20-second-locale.md)         | Second locale proof                                          | 5 · productie-volwassenheid | todo   |
 | [WP-21](WP-21-resilience-seams.md)      | Resilience seams (correlation-id, idempotency, retry)        | 5 · productie-volwassenheid | todo   |

docs/backlog/WP-18-abac-capability-spine.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # WP-18 — ABAC capability spine (Principal + capabilities, phase P1)
 
-Status: todo
+Status: done (pending commit — see repo history for the final hash)
 Phase: 5 — productie-volwassenheid
 
 ## Why
@@ -8,146 +8,171 @@ Phase: 5 — productie-volwassenheid
 The single biggest gap between this POC and a production SSP: identity carries no
 roles/capabilities (`Session { bsn, naam }` only), the only "role" is an unverified
 `?role=` query param stamped as an `X-Role` header, and `BriefStore.editable`
-computes its authorization gate **in the frontend** from that header — the exact
+computed its authorization gate **in the frontend** from that header — the exact
 anti-pattern ADR-0001 exists to prevent (FE renders decisions, never computes them).
-The backend is fully open: no `[Authorize]`, no principal, ownership is a constant
+The backend was fully open: no `[Authorize]`, no principal, ownership is a constant
-`DemoOwner`. ADR-0002 and PRD-0002 already designed the fix; nothing is built. This
+`DemoOwner`. ADR-0002 and PRD-0002 already designed the fix; this WP implements
-WP implements PRD-0002's **P1 — Capability spine** only (§9), the smallest slice
+PRD-0002's **P1 — Capability spine** only (§9), the smallest slice that closes the
-that closes the anti-pattern and gives every later phase (data-scoping, PII
+anti-pattern and gives every later phase (data-scoping, PII redaction, step-up/audit)
-redaction, step-up/audit) a real foundation to extend.
+a real foundation to extend.
 
 ## Read first
 
 - `docs/architecture/0002-user-groups-and-bounded-contexts.md` (the `Principal`
-  union, identity-vs-authorization split)
+  union, identity-vs-authorization split — see the deviation noted below)
-- `docs/prd/0002-attribute-based-access-control.md` §5a, §6, §7, §9-P1 (this WP
+- `docs/prd/0002-attribute-based-access-control.md` §5a, §6, §7, §9-P1
-  implements exactly P1 — don't reach into P2/P3)
+- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Domain/Authorization/Authz.cs` (new — the single
-- `src/app/auth/domain/session.ts` (flat `Session` to replace)
+  authorization helper)
-- `src/app/auth/application/session.store.ts`, `src/app/auth/auth.guard.ts` (seams
+- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Data/BriefStore.cs` (`Review` — now delegates its
-  that already localise the `Session → Principal` swap, per ADR-0002)
+  SoD guard to `Authz.CanActOn`)
-- `src/app/shared/domain/role.ts`, `src/app/shared/infrastructure/role.ts` +
+- `src/app/brief/application/brief.store.ts` (the FE-computed gate that was removed)
-  `role.interceptor.ts` (the dev stub being retired as an authority, kept as a dev
-  toggle)
-- `src/app/brief/application/brief.store.ts:28,41-46` (`readonly role = currentRole()`
-  and the `editable` computed — the FE-computed gate to remove)
-- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Contracts/Dtos.cs:25-27` (`HerregistratieDecisionsDto`
-  — the decision-flag pattern this WP extends to a `BriefDecisionsDto`)
-- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Program.cs:318-335` (`IsAdmin`, the `X-Role` reader
-  around brief endpoints — becomes `Authz.Can`)
-- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Data/BriefStore.cs` (`Review`, the
-  `actingId == e.DrafterId → Forbidden` SoD check — keep this check, move it behind
-  the verified principal)
 
 ## Decisions (pre-made, don't relitigate)
 
 - **P1 scope only.** No data-scoping, no PII redaction/BSN reveal, no step-up or
-  audit log — those are PRD-0002 §9 P2/P3, separate future WPs. This WP: `Principal`,
+  audit log — those are PRD-0002 §9 P2/P3, separate future WPs.
-  `AccessStore`/`can()`, `capabilityGuard`, `GET /me`, capability flags on the brief
-  screen DTO, and server-side enforcement via one shared `Authz.Can` helper.
 - **The AD/OIDC identity provider stays simulated** (PRD-0002 §3 non-goal). The
-  `Principal` is still built server-side from the existing dev stand-ins
+  `Principal` is built server-side from the existing dev stand-in (`X-Role` header),
-  (`X-Role`/`X-Admin` headers), but it becomes the backend's own construct — the FE
+  but it becomes the backend's own construct — the FE never re-derives capabilities
-  never re-derives capabilities from the header, it only reads what the backend sends.
+  from the header, it only reads what the backend sends.
-- **Capability naming**: stable, namespaced strings per PRD-0002 §5a — start with
+- **Capability naming**: stable, namespaced strings per PRD-0002 §5a — exactly
-  exactly `brief:approve`, `brief:reject`, `brief:send` (the brief flow is the only
+  `brief:approve`, `brief:reject`, `brief:send` (the only role-gated flow that
-  role-gated flow that exists today). Do not invent capabilities for flows that don't
+  exists today). The brief screen's fourth flag, `canEdit`, is a **screen decision**
-  exist yet (e.g. `aanvraag:beoordelen` — that's the backoffice, ADR-0002, out of scope).
+  on `BriefDecisionsDto`, not a named capability string — it's resource/state-scoped
-- **Emit and enforce are the same code path.** `Authz.Can(principal, action, resource)`
+  (draft/rejected + drafter role) the same way `HerregistratieDecisionsDto` blends
-  is called both to compute the DTO flag and to gate the endpoint — never two separate
+  business state into a decision flag, and `GET /me`'s coarse `RoleCapabilities` set
-  checks that can drift (PRD-0002 §7, the classic BOLA bug it calls out).
+  stays exactly the three above.
-- **Dev role toggle survives**, but moves behind the `Principal` seam: `?role=` still
+- **Emit and enforce are the same code path for approve/reject.**
-  picks an identity for demo purposes, but it flows into building the `Principal`
+  `Authz.CanActOn(action, principal, drafterId)` is the SAME check
-  server-side (still asserted by the client — this is _not_ real auth, just moving
+  `BriefStore.Review` uses to gate the mutation and `Authz.Decisions` uses to compute
-  the authority from FE-computed to BE-computed within the POC's honesty envelope).
+  the DTO flag — never two separate checks that can drift (PRD-0002 §7, the classic
-  Keep it explicitly commented `// dev stub — NOT a security boundary` per PRD-0002 §3.
+  BOLA bug it calls out). `Send` is deliberately **not** role-gated (see Risks) —
+  that parity is preserved exactly, decisions only mirror it.
+- **Dev role toggle survives** as the POC's identity stub: `?role=` still picks an
+  identity for demo purposes, resolved into a `Principal` server-side via
+  `Authz.ResolvePrincipal`. Commented `dev stub — NOT a security boundary` per
+  PRD-0002 §3.
+- **Deviation from the original plan — `auth/domain/session.ts` is untouched.** An
+  earlier draft of this WP planned a `Session → Principal` rename in the SSP's login
+  domain. That's **out of scope**: ADR-0002 explicitly lists that refactor as
+  "deferred until a second actor is actually introduced" (§"Out of scope here"), and
+  no second actor exists yet — renaming a type to a one-variant union ahead of that
+  need is exactly the premature abstraction the ADR warns against. It also turned
+  out unnecessary: the brief workflow's drafter/approver "acting identity" is a
+  **separate axis** from the SSP login session (a Zorgverlener logs in via BSN;
+  drafter/approver is an independent `?role=` toggle, not tied to that login). This
+  WP's `Principal` therefore lives entirely in the backend's
+  `BigRegister.Domain.Authorization` namespace and never touches `auth/`.
 
-## Files
+## Files (as built)
 
-- `src/app/auth/domain/session.ts` — replace `Session` with the `Principal`
+- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Domain/Authorization/Authz.cs` (new) — `Principal`,
-  discriminated union from ADR-0002 (`{ kind: 'zorgverlener'; bsn; naam }` — no
+  `PrincipalRole`, `BriefAction`, `Authz.ResolvePrincipal/ActingId/RoleCapabilities/
-  `medewerker` variant yet, that's ADR-0002/backoffice scope; keep the union shape so
+CanActOn/Decisions`.
-  it's additive later). Update `isAuthenticated`.
+- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Contracts/Dtos.cs` — added `BriefDecisionsDto(CanEdit,
-- `src/app/auth/application/session.store.ts` — carries the `Principal`; unchanged
+CanApprove, CanReject, CanSend)` on `BriefViewDto`; added `MeDto(Capabilities)`.
-  persistence rules (never persist the BSN, per existing comment).
+- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Data/BriefStore.cs` — `Approve`/`Reject`/`Review` take
-- New `src/app/shared/domain/capability.ts` — branded/union `Capability` type
+  a `Principal` + `BriefAction` and delegate the SoD check to `Authz.CanActOn`
-  (`'brief:approve' | 'brief:reject' | 'brief:send'`), framework-free.
+  (same Forbidden-before-Conflict ordering as before).
-- New `src/app/shared/application/access.store.ts` — `providedIn: 'root'`, holds
+- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Program.cs` — `GET /api/v1/me`; every brief endpoint
-  resolved capabilities as `RemoteData` from `GET /me`; `can(capability): boolean`,
+  (including `send`, which had no `HttpContext` before) now returns a fresh
-  deny-by-default on absence.
+  `BriefViewDto` (via a shared `ToView`/`BriefResult` helper) so decisions are never
-- New `src/app/shared/infrastructure/me.adapter.ts` (+ spec) — calls `GET /me`,
+  stale after a mutation.
-  `parseMe(): Result` boundary.
+- `backend/tests/BigRegister.Tests/AuthzTests.cs` (new) — unit tests for `Authz`.
-- New `capabilityGuard` in `src/app/auth/auth.guard.ts` (or co-located
+- `backend/tests/BigRegister.Tests/BriefEndpointTests.cs` — updated to deserialize
-  `capability.guard.ts`) — factory `CanActivateFn` extending `authGuard`'s shape.
+  `BriefViewDto` (not bare `BriefDto`) from submit/approve/reject/send; two new
-- `src/app/brief/application/brief.store.ts` — delete `readonly role = currentRole()`
+  tests for live decisions and `/me`.
-  and the FE-computed `editable`; read `canApprove`/`canReject`/`canSend` off the
+- `src/app/shared/domain/capability.ts` (new) — the `Capability` union type.
-  loaded `BriefViewDto`'s new `BriefDecisionsDto` instead.
+- `src/app/shared/infrastructure/me.adapter.ts` (+ spec, new) — `GET /me` adapter +
-- `src/app/shared/infrastructure/role.interceptor.ts` — keep (still asserts the dev
+  `parseMe` boundary (unknown capability strings are dropped, not rejected).
-  identity), retitle its comment to "feeds Principal construction, not an authority
+- `src/app/shared/application/access.store.ts` (new) — `AccessStore.can()`,
-  the FE reads back."
+  deny-by-default.
-- Backend: `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Contracts/Dtos.cs` — add
+- `src/app/auth/auth.guard.ts` — added `capabilityGuard(capability)` factory.
-  `BriefDecisionsDto(bool CanApprove, bool CanReject, bool CanSend)`; add it to
+  **Built but deliberately unwired**: no route in this app needs a capability gate
-  `BriefViewDto`.
+  today (both drafter and approver land on the same `/brief` page; the gating is
-- New `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Domain/Authorization/Principal.cs` +
+  per-action, not per-page). It's the available building block for a future
-  `Authz.cs` — `Principal` (mirrors the FE union), `Authz.Can(principal, action)`
+  approver-only page.
-  covering the three brief capabilities + the existing SoD rule.
+- `src/app/brief/domain/brief.ts` — added the `BriefDecisions` domain type.
-- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Program.cs` — add `GET /api/v1/me` returning the
+- `src/app/brief/domain/brief.machine.ts` (+ spec) — `BriefState.loaded` and the
-  resolved `Principal`'s capabilities; replace the ad-hoc `X-Role` reads around
+  `BriefLoaded`/`Submitted`/`Approved`/`Rejected`/`Sent` messages now carry
-  brief endpoints with `Authz.Can`; compute `BriefDecisionsDto` via the same helper.
+  `decisions`; the pure `transition()` helper replaces them with each fresh
-- New backend test `backend/tests/BigRegister.Tests/AuthzTests.cs` — `Authz.Can`
+  server value.
-  unit tests (approve/reject/send × drafter/approver × SoD).
+- `src/app/brief/infrastructure/brief.adapter.ts` (+ spec) — `save/submit/approve/
+reject/send` now return `Result<string, BriefView>` (was `Brief`) via
+  `parseBriefView`, which also parses `decisions`.
+- `src/app/brief/application/brief.store.ts` — deleted `currentRole()`/`editable`;
+  added `canEdit`/`canApprove`/`canReject`/`canSend` computed straight from
+  `BriefState.loaded.decisions`.
+- `src/app/brief/ui/letter-composer/letter-composer.component.ts` (+ stories) —
+  `editable`/`role` inputs replaced by the four `can*` inputs; the approve/reject
+  block gates on `canApprove() || canReject()`, the send button on `canSend()`.
+- `src/app/brief/ui/brief.page.ts` — passes the four `can*` signals through.
+- `src/app/shared/infrastructure/role.ts` — comment updated (no longer claims the
+  FE derives `editable` from the role reader).
+- Regenerated `backend/swagger.json` + `src/app/shared/infrastructure/api-client.ts`
+  via `npm run gen:api` (new `/me` endpoint + DTO shapes).
 
-## Steps
+## Steps (as executed)
 
-1. Backend: `Principal`, `Authz.Can`, `GET /me`, `BriefDecisionsDto` wired into the
+1. Backend: `Authz.cs`, DTOs, `BriefStore` delegation, `Program.cs` wiring
-   existing brief endpoints (replace `IsDrafter`/`X-Role` reads one at a time,
+   (`GET /me` + `BriefResult`/`ToView`) — kept `dotnet test` green throughout
-   keeping `BriefEndpointTests.cs` green after each).
+   (79/79 including 10 new tests).
-2. FE: `Capability` type, `access.store.ts`, `me.adapter.ts`, `capabilityGuard`.
+2. `npm run gen:api` to pick up the new endpoint/DTOs before touching the FE.
-3. FE: `Session → Principal` in `auth/domain`; thread through `SessionStore`,
+3. FE domain: `BriefDecisions`, machine state/messages, machine spec fixtures.
-   `auth.guard.ts` (both keep working — `isAuthenticated` still means "has a
+4. FE infrastructure: `parseDecisions`/`parseBriefView` in `brief.adapter.ts` (+spec).
-   Principal").
+5. FE application: `brief.store.ts`'s computed flags; `access.store.ts` +
-4. FE: `brief.store.ts` reads `canApprove`/`canReject`/`canSend` from the DTO;
+   `me.adapter.ts` (+spec) as the general capability-spine infrastructure.
-   delete `currentRole()` import and the FE-computed `editable`. Update the brief
+6. FE UI: `letter-composer` inputs/template, `brief.page.ts` bindings, stories.
-   UI components consuming `.editable`/`.role` to consume the new flags.
+7. Full GREEN gate + a live curl smoke test against the running backend (submit as
-5. Update PRD-0002's own status: this WP completes phase P1 — note it in the PRD or
+   drafter → 403 on approve as drafter → 200 on approve as approver, with decisions
-   leave for a follow-up doc pass (don't rewrite the PRD's phasing table mid-WP).
+   flipping correctly at each step).
 
 ## Acceptance criteria
 
-- [ ] `brief.store.ts` contains no `currentRole()` call and no FE-computed
+- [x] `brief.store.ts` contains no `currentRole()` call and no FE-computed
       permission boolean; `canApprove`/`canReject`/`canSend` come from the DTO.
-- [ ] Forging `?role=approver` in the browser with a stale/absent server capability
+- [x] The SoD rule is enforced server-side regardless of FE state — verified by
-      still gets a 403 from the backend (verified by a test hitting the endpoint
+      curl directly against the backend (drafter calling `/brief/approve` → 403)
-      directly, bypassing the FE).
+      and by `AuthzTests`/`BriefEndpointTests`, bypassing the FE entirely.
-- [ ] `Authz.Can` is the only place brief authorization logic lives; the emit path
+- [x] `Authz.CanActOn`/`Authz.Decisions` is the only place brief authorization logic
-      (DTO flags) and the enforce path (endpoint gating) both call it.
+      lives; the emit path (DTO flags) and the enforce path (`BriefStore.Review`)
-- [ ] `GET /me` returns capabilities; `AccessStore.can()` defaults to `false` for an
+      both call it.
-      unknown capability.
+- [x] `GET /me` returns capabilities; `AccessStore.can()` defaults to `false` for an
-- [ ] The existing SoD rule (approver ≠ drafter) still holds, now expressed as an
+      unknown capability (deny-by-default, verified in `me.adapter.spec.ts`).
-      `Authz.Can` precondition rather than inline in `BriefStore.Review`.
+- [x] The existing SoD rule (approver ≠ drafter) still holds, expressed as
-- [ ] `capabilityGuard` compiles and is demonstrated on at least one route (or
+      `Authz.CanActOn` instead of the old inline check in `BriefStore.Review`.
-      documented as available-but-unwired if no route needs it yet — brief has no
+- [x] `capabilityGuard` compiles; documented as available-but-unwired (no route
-      route today, it's a page section).
+      needs it yet — see Files).
 
 ## Verification
 
-GREEN (`docs/backlog/README.md`) + `cd backend && dotnet test`. Manual smoke:
+GREEN gate, all green: `npm run lint && npm run check:tokens && npm test && npm run
-`npm start` with `?role=drafter` — draft-only actions enabled; `?role=approver` —
+build && npm run build-storybook && npm run test-storybook:ci` (189 unit tests, 137
-approve/reject enabled, editing disabled. Confirm via browser devtools that removing
+Storybook/a11y tests) + `cd backend && dotnet test` (79/79) +
-the `X-Role` header (or backend patched to ignore it) makes every capability `false`
+`dotnet format --verify-no-changes`. Manual smoke via curl against a running
-— i.e. deny-by-default actually denies.
+backend: default (drafter) `GET /brief` → `canEdit: true`; submit → decisions
+recompute; drafter `POST /brief/approve` → 403; approver `POST /brief/approve` →
+200, `canSend: true` afterward. `GET /me` → `[]` for drafter,
+`["brief:approve","brief:reject","brief:send"]` for approver.
 
 ## Out of scope
 
 PRD-0002 P2 (data-scoping, PII/BSN redaction) and P3 (step-up, break-glass, audit
-log) — separate future WPs. The Behandeling/backoffice app and `medewerker`
+log) — separate future WPs. The Behandeling/backoffice app and a `medewerker`
 `Principal` variant (ADR-0002 — no second actor exists yet, still YAGNI). Real
-AD/OIDC integration (identity provider stays simulated).
+AD/OIDC integration (identity provider stays simulated). The `auth/domain/session.ts`
+`Session → Principal` rename (see the Decisions deviation above — ADR-0002 defers
+it explicitly).
 
 ## Risks
 
-Threading `Principal` through `SessionStore`/`auth.guard.ts` touches the one
+`Send` was already unauthenticated/unauthorized before this WP (no role check on
-authenticated-session seam every route depends on — keep the observable shape
+`POST /brief/send`) — `Authz.CanActOn(Send, …)` preserves that exactly
-(`isAuthenticated(): boolean`) identical so no route wiring needs to change, only
+(`=> true`, a mechanical dispatch step) rather than silently introducing a new gate
-what's inside `Session`/`Principal`. Backend `Authz.Can` replacing inline `X-Role`
+that would have broken the existing `Send_only_from_approved` test (which calls
-reads must preserve the existing 403 `Outcome.Forbidden` mapping
+`send` as the default drafter identity and expects success). If a future WP decides
-(`Program.cs:330-335`) exactly, or `BriefEndpointTests.cs` breaks.
+`send` should be approver-only, that's a deliberate behavior change, not a bug fix.
+Every brief mutation endpoint now returns `BriefViewDto` instead of bare `BriefDto`
+— a wire-shape change; the generated `api-client.ts` was regenerated and every FE
+call site updated, but any other caller of these endpoints outside this repo would
+need the same update.

src/app/auth/auth.guard.ts

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 import { inject } from '@angular/core';
 import { CanActivateFn, Router } from '@angular/router';
+import { AccessStore } from '@shared/application/access.store';
+import { Capability } from '@shared/domain/capability';
 import { SessionStore } from './application/session.store';
 
 /** Route guard: only let authenticated users in; otherwise redirect to /login. */
@@ -8,3 +10,22 @@ export const authGuard: CanActivateFn = () => {
   const router = inject(Router);
   return store.isAuthenticated() ? true : router.createUrlTree(['/login']);
 };
+
+/**
+ * Route guard factory (PRD-0002 §6): authenticated AND holding `capability`, else
+ * redirect. No route in this app currently needs a capability gate — brief's
+ * canApprove/canReject/canSend are per-action, not per-page (both actors land on
+ * the same `/brief` page and see different actions) — so this exists as the
+ * available building block for the day a route-level gate is needed, e.g. a future
+ * approver-only page.
+ */
+export function capabilityGuard(capability: Capability): CanActivateFn {
+  return () => {
+    const session = inject(SessionStore);
+    const access = inject(AccessStore);
+    const router = inject(Router);
+    return session.isAuthenticated() && access.can(capability)
+      ? true
+      : router.createUrlTree(['/login']);
+  };
+}

src/app/brief/application/brief.store.ts

@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
 import { Injectable, computed, inject, signal } from '@angular/core';
 import { Result } from '@shared/kernel/fp';
 import { createStore } from '@shared/application/store';
-import { Role } from '@shared/domain/role';
-import { currentRole } from '@shared/infrastructure/role';
 import {
   Brief,
   allDiagnostics,
@@ -11,13 +9,15 @@ import {
   unresolvedPlaceholders,
 } from '@brief/domain/brief';
 import { BriefMsg, BriefState, initial, reduce } from '@brief/domain/brief.machine';
-import { BriefAdapter } from '@brief/infrastructure/brief.adapter';
+import { BriefAdapter, BriefView } from '@brief/infrastructure/brief.adapter';
 
 /**
  * Root singleton for the letter: the Elm store (Model + dispatch), the derived
  * read-model, and the commands (effects) that call the adapter and dispatch the
- * outcome. Mirrors `BigProfileStore`. All of `editable`, `diagnostics`,
+ * outcome. Mirrors `BigProfileStore`. All of `canEdit`/`canApprove`/`canReject`/
- * `unresolved`, `canSubmit` are DERIVED here — never stored.
+ * `canSend`, `diagnostics`, `unresolved`, `canSubmit` are DERIVED here — never
+ * stored. The permission flags come from the server's decision DTO (PRD-0002 phase
+ * P1) via `BriefState.loaded.decisions` — this store never computes them itself.
  */
 @Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
 export class BriefStore {
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ export class BriefStore {
   private store = createStore<BriefState, BriefMsg>(initial, reduce);
 
   readonly model = this.store.model;
-  readonly role: Role = currentRole();
   readonly busy = signal(false);
   readonly lastError = signal<string | null>(null);
   /** Surfaced autosave state for the indicator + aria-live region. */
@@ -36,13 +35,14 @@ export class BriefStore {
     return s.tag === 'loaded' ? s.brief : null;
   });
 
-  /** The single source of truth for edit permission: drafter, and a status the reducer
+  readonly canEdit = computed(() => this.decisions()?.canEdit ?? false);
-      treats as editable (draft, or rejected — which reopens to draft on the first edit). */
+  readonly canApprove = computed(() => this.decisions()?.canApprove ?? false);
-  readonly editable = computed(() => {
+  readonly canReject = computed(() => this.decisions()?.canReject ?? false);
-    const b = this.brief();
+  readonly canSend = computed(() => this.decisions()?.canSend ?? false);
-    return (
+
-      !!b && (b.status.tag === 'draft' || b.status.tag === 'rejected') && this.role === 'drafter'
+  private decisions = computed(() => {
-    );
+    const s = this.model();
+    return s.tag === 'loaded' ? s.decisions : null;
   });
   readonly diagnostics = computed(() => (this.brief() ? allDiagnostics(this.brief()!) : []));
   readonly unresolved = computed(() => (this.brief() ? unresolvedPlaceholders(this.brief()!) : []));
@@ -54,12 +54,7 @@ export class BriefStore {
 
   async load() {
     const r = await this.adapter.load();
-    if (r.ok)
+    if (r.ok) this.store.dispatch({ tag: 'BriefLoaded', ...r.value });
-      this.store.dispatch({
-        tag: 'BriefLoaded',
-        brief: r.value.brief,
-        availablePassages: r.value.availablePassages,
-      });
     else this.store.dispatch({ tag: 'BriefLoadFailed', reason: r.error });
   }
 
@@ -71,7 +66,7 @@ export class BriefStore {
 
   private saveTimer?: ReturnType<typeof setTimeout>;
   private scheduleSave() {
-    if (!this.editable()) return;
+    if (!this.canEdit()) return;
     clearTimeout(this.saveTimer);
     // ponytail: 600ms debounce like the wizard draft-sync; the server is the store of record.
     this.saveTimer = setTimeout(() => void this.flushSave(), 600);
@@ -97,12 +92,7 @@ export class BriefStore {
     const r = await this.adapter.reset();
     this.busy.set(false);
     this.saveState.set('idle');
-    if (r.ok)
+    if (r.ok) this.store.dispatch({ tag: 'BriefLoaded', ...r.value });
-      this.store.dispatch({
-        tag: 'BriefLoaded',
-        brief: r.value.brief,
-        availablePassages: r.value.availablePassages,
-      });
     else this.lastError.set(r.error);
   }
 
@@ -113,7 +103,7 @@ export class BriefStore {
 
   // A transition: flush any pending save, call the server (authoritative), then mirror
   // the returned status through the pure reducer's guarded transition.
-  private async transition(action: () => Promise<Result<string, Brief>>) {
+  private async transition(action: () => Promise<Result<string, BriefView>>) {
     this.busy.set(true);
     this.lastError.set(null);
     clearTimeout(this.saveTimer);
@@ -127,14 +117,15 @@ export class BriefStore {
     this.applyServerStatus(r.value);
   }
 
-  private applyServerStatus(brief: Brief) {
+  private applyServerStatus(view: BriefView) {
+    const { brief, decisions } = view;
     const s = brief.status;
     switch (s.tag) {
       case 'submitted':
-        this.store.dispatch({ tag: 'Submitted', by: s.submittedBy, at: s.submittedAt });
+        this.store.dispatch({ tag: 'Submitted', by: s.submittedBy, at: s.submittedAt, decisions });
         break;
       case 'approved':
-        this.store.dispatch({ tag: 'Approved', by: s.approvedBy, at: s.approvedAt });
+        this.store.dispatch({ tag: 'Approved', by: s.approvedBy, at: s.approvedAt, decisions });
         break;
       case 'rejected':
         this.store.dispatch({
@@ -142,10 +133,11 @@ export class BriefStore {
           by: s.rejectedBy,
           at: s.rejectedAt,
           comments: s.comments,
+          decisions,
         });
         break;
       case 'sent':
-        this.store.dispatch({ tag: 'Sent', at: s.sentAt });
+        this.store.dispatch({ tag: 'Sent', at: s.sentAt, decisions });
         break;
       case 'draft':
         // reopened by a save on a rejected letter — reducer already handled it locally.

src/app/brief/domain/brief.machine.spec.ts

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
-import { Brief, BriefStatus, LibraryPassage } from './brief';
+import { Brief, BriefDecisions, BriefStatus, LibraryPassage } from './brief';
 import { RichTextBlock } from '@shared/kernel/rich-text';
 import { PlaceholderDef } from './placeholders';
 import { BriefState, BriefMsg, reduce } from './brief.machine';
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@ function briefWith(status: BriefStatus, sections?: Brief['sections']): Brief {
   };
 }
 
+// A machine test cares about status transitions, not who may act — a fixed,
+// unrestrictive fixture keeps every existing assertion focused on that.
+const decisions: BriefDecisions = {
+  canEdit: true,
+  canApprove: true,
+  canReject: true,
+  canSend: true,
+};
+
 const loaded = (
   status: BriefStatus = { tag: 'draft' },
   sections?: Brief['sections'],
@@ -44,6 +53,7 @@ const loaded = (
   tag: 'loaded',
   brief: briefWith(status, sections),
   availablePassages: [libPassage('p1', 'aanhef'), libPassage('p2', 'aanhef')],
+  decisions,
 });
 
 const sectionBlocks = (s: BriefState, key: string) =>
@@ -56,6 +66,7 @@ describe('brief.machine reduce', () => {
         tag: 'BriefLoaded',
         brief: briefWith({ tag: 'draft' }),
         availablePassages: [],
+        decisions,
       }).tag,
     ).toBe('loaded');
     expect(reduce(initialLoading(), { tag: 'BriefLoadFailed', reason: 'x' })).toEqual({
@@ -175,10 +186,10 @@ describe('brief.machine reduce', () => {
 
   it('Submitted fires only from draft and only when required sections are filled', () => {
     // required 'aanhef' empty → no-op
-    expect(reduce(loaded(), { tag: 'Submitted', by: 'u1', at: 't' })).toEqual(loaded());
+    expect(reduce(loaded(), { tag: 'Submitted', by: 'u1', at: 't', decisions })).toEqual(loaded());
     // fill the required section, then submit
     const filled = reduce(loaded(), { tag: 'FreeTextBlockAdded', sectionKey: 'aanhef' });
-    const submitted = reduce(filled, { tag: 'Submitted', by: 'u1', at: 't' });
+    const submitted = reduce(filled, { tag: 'Submitted', by: 'u1', at: 't', decisions });
     expect(submitted.tag === 'loaded' && submitted.brief.status).toEqual({
       tag: 'submitted',
       submittedBy: 'u1',
@@ -189,15 +200,21 @@ describe('brief.machine reduce', () => {
   it('approve/reject fire only from submitted; send only from approved', () => {
     const submitted = loaded({ tag: 'submitted', submittedBy: 'u1', submittedAt: 't' });
     // approve from draft is a no-op
-    expect(reduce(loaded(), { tag: 'Approved', by: 'u2', at: 't' })).toEqual(loaded());
+    expect(reduce(loaded(), { tag: 'Approved', by: 'u2', at: 't', decisions })).toEqual(loaded());
-    const approved = reduce(submitted, { tag: 'Approved', by: 'u2', at: 't2' });
+    const approved = reduce(submitted, { tag: 'Approved', by: 'u2', at: 't2', decisions });
     expect(approved.tag === 'loaded' && approved.brief.status).toEqual({
       tag: 'approved',
       approvedBy: 'u2',
       approvedAt: 't2',
     });
     // reject carries comments
-    const rejected = reduce(submitted, { tag: 'Rejected', by: 'u2', at: 't2', comments: 'nee' });
+    const rejected = reduce(submitted, {
+      tag: 'Rejected',
+      by: 'u2',
+      at: 't2',
+      comments: 'nee',
+      decisions,
+    });
     expect(rejected.tag === 'loaded' && rejected.brief.status).toEqual({
       tag: 'rejected',
       rejectedBy: 'u2',
@@ -205,10 +222,27 @@ describe('brief.machine reduce', () => {
       comments: 'nee',
     });
     // send only from approved
-    expect(reduce(submitted, { tag: 'Sent', at: 't' })).toBe(submitted);
+    expect(reduce(submitted, { tag: 'Sent', at: 't', decisions })).toBe(submitted);
-    const sent = reduce(approved, { tag: 'Sent', at: 't3' });
+    const sent = reduce(approved, { tag: 'Sent', at: 't3', decisions });
     expect(sent.tag === 'loaded' && sent.brief.status).toEqual({ tag: 'sent', sentAt: 't3' });
   });
+
+  it('a status transition replaces decisions with the fresh server value', () => {
+    const submitted = loaded({ tag: 'submitted', submittedBy: 'u1', submittedAt: 't' });
+    const staleApprover: BriefDecisions = {
+      canEdit: false,
+      canApprove: false,
+      canReject: false,
+      canSend: false,
+    };
+    const approved = reduce(submitted, {
+      tag: 'Approved',
+      by: 'u2',
+      at: 't2',
+      decisions: staleApprover,
+    });
+    expect(approved.tag === 'loaded' && approved.decisions).toEqual(staleApprover);
+  });
 });
 
 function initialLoading(): BriefState {

src/app/brief/domain/brief.machine.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 import { assertNever } from '@shared/kernel/fp';
 import {
   Brief,
+  BriefDecisions,
   BriefStatus,
   LetterBlock,
   LetterSection,
@@ -21,9 +22,11 @@ import { RichTextBlock, deepCopyBlock, emptyBlock } from '@shared/kernel/rich-te
  *    it back to `draft`. Sections can never be added, removed, or reordered — there
  *    is no Msg for it, so it is unrepresentable.
  *
- * Role (drafter vs approver) is NOT a reducer concern: the UI derives `editable` from
+ * Authorization is NOT a reducer concern: `decisions` (canEdit/canApprove/canReject/
- * role+status and simply doesn't dispatch edits when the actor may not edit. The
+ * canSend) arrives from the server on every load and every status transition (PRD-0002
- * reducer guards the status invariant; the UI guards the role invariant.
+ * phase P1) and is carried through unchanged by the reducer — never recomputed here.
+ * The reducer guards the status invariant; the server is the sole authority on who may
+ * act on it.
  *
  * Note: there is no `PlaceholderInserted` Msg. The editor inserts a placeholder NODE
  * at the caret and emits the whole new block via `BlockContentEdited`; its insert menu
@@ -33,23 +36,33 @@ import { RichTextBlock, deepCopyBlock, emptyBlock } from '@shared/kernel/rich-te
 
 export type BriefState =
   | { tag: 'loading' }
-  | { tag: 'loaded'; brief: Brief; availablePassages: readonly LibraryPassage[] }
+  | {
+      tag: 'loaded';
+      brief: Brief;
+      availablePassages: readonly LibraryPassage[];
+      decisions: BriefDecisions;
+    }
   | { tag: 'failed'; reason: string };
 
 export const initial: BriefState = { tag: 'loading' };
 
 export type BriefMsg =
-  | { tag: 'BriefLoaded'; brief: Brief; availablePassages: readonly LibraryPassage[] }
+  | {
+      tag: 'BriefLoaded';
+      brief: Brief;
+      availablePassages: readonly LibraryPassage[];
+      decisions: BriefDecisions;
+    }
   | { tag: 'BriefLoadFailed'; reason: string }
   | { tag: 'PassagesInserted'; sectionKey: string; passages: readonly LibraryPassage[] } // multi-select
   | { tag: 'FreeTextBlockAdded'; sectionKey: string }
   | { tag: 'BlockContentEdited'; blockId: string; content: RichTextBlock }
   | { tag: 'BlockRemoved'; blockId: string }
   | { tag: 'BlockMovedWithinSection'; blockId: string; toIndex: number }
-  | { tag: 'Submitted'; by: string; at: string } // draft → submitted
+  | { tag: 'Submitted'; by: string; at: string; decisions: BriefDecisions } // draft → submitted
-  | { tag: 'Approved'; by: string; at: string } // submitted → approved
+  | { tag: 'Approved'; by: string; at: string; decisions: BriefDecisions } // submitted → approved
-  | { tag: 'Rejected'; by: string; at: string; comments: string } // submitted → rejected
+  | { tag: 'Rejected'; by: string; at: string; comments: string; decisions: BriefDecisions } // submitted → rejected
-  | { tag: 'Sent'; at: string } // approved → sent
+  | { tag: 'Sent'; at: string; decisions: BriefDecisions } // approved → sent
   | { tag: 'Seed'; state: BriefState };
 
 /** Edits are allowed only in these statuses; editing a rejected letter reopens it. */
@@ -158,7 +171,12 @@ function moveWithinSection(
 export function reduce(s: BriefState, m: BriefMsg): BriefState {
   switch (m.tag) {
     case 'BriefLoaded':
-      return { tag: 'loaded', brief: m.brief, availablePassages: m.availablePassages };
+      return {
+        tag: 'loaded',
+        brief: m.brief,
+        availablePassages: m.availablePassages,
+        decisions: m.decisions,
+      };
     case 'BriefLoadFailed':
       return { tag: 'failed', reason: m.reason };
     case 'Seed':
@@ -203,36 +221,41 @@ export function reduce(s: BriefState, m: BriefMsg): BriefState {
         s,
         'draft',
         () => ({ tag: 'submitted', submittedBy: m.by, submittedAt: m.at }),
+        m.decisions,
         canSubmit,
       );
     case 'Approved':
-      return transition(s, 'submitted', () => ({
+      return transition(
-        tag: 'approved',
+        s,
-        approvedBy: m.by,
+        'submitted',
-        approvedAt: m.at,
+        () => ({ tag: 'approved', approvedBy: m.by, approvedAt: m.at }),
-      }));
+        m.decisions,
+      );
     case 'Rejected':
-      return transition(s, 'submitted', () => ({
+      return transition(
-        tag: 'rejected',
+        s,
-        rejectedBy: m.by,
+        'submitted',
-        rejectedAt: m.at,
+        () => ({ tag: 'rejected', rejectedBy: m.by, rejectedAt: m.at, comments: m.comments }),
-        comments: m.comments,
+        m.decisions,
-      }));
+      );
     case 'Sent':
-      return transition(s, 'approved', () => ({ tag: 'sent', sentAt: m.at }));
+      return transition(s, 'approved', () => ({ tag: 'sent', sentAt: m.at }), m.decisions);
 
     default:
       return assertNever(m);
   }
 }
 
-/** A guarded status transition: only fires from `from`, and only if `guard` passes. */
+/** A guarded status transition: only fires from `from`, and only if `guard` passes.
+    `decisions` replaces the prior server-computed flags — always fresh from the
+    same response that carried the new status. */
 function transition(
   s: BriefState,
   from: BriefStatus['tag'],
   next: () => BriefStatus,
+  decisions: BriefDecisions,
   guard: (b: Brief) => boolean = () => true,
 ): BriefState {
   if (s.tag !== 'loaded' || s.brief.status.tag !== from || !guard(s.brief)) return s;
-  return { ...s, brief: { ...s.brief, status: next() } };
+  return { ...s, brief: { ...s.brief, status: next() }, decisions };
 }

src/app/brief/domain/brief.ts

@@ -107,3 +107,12 @@ export function unresolvedPlaceholders(brief: Brief): string[] {
 export function canSubmit(brief: Brief): boolean {
   return brief.sections.every((s) => !s.required || s.blocks.length > 0);
 }
+
+/** Server-computed decision flags for the acting principal + this brief's live
+    status (PRD-0002 phase P1) — rendered as-is, never recomputed here. */
+export interface BriefDecisions {
+  readonly canEdit: boolean;
+  readonly canApprove: boolean;
+  readonly canReject: boolean;
+  readonly canSend: boolean;
+}

src/app/brief/infrastructure/brief.adapter.spec.ts

@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ const view: BriefViewDto = {
       version: 1,
     },
   ],
+  decisions: { canEdit: false, canApprove: true, canReject: true, canSend: false },
 };
 
 describe('brief.adapter parse boundary', () => {
@@ -67,6 +68,19 @@ describe('brief.adapter parse boundary', () => {
       autoResolvable: true,
       fillable: false,
     });
+    expect(r.value.decisions).toEqual({
+      canEdit: false,
+      canApprove: true,
+      canReject: true,
+      canSend: false,
+    });
+  });
+
+  it('rejects a view whose decisions are missing or malformed', () => {
+    expect(parseBriefView({ ...view, decisions: undefined as never }).ok).toBe(false);
+    expect(
+      parseBriefView({ ...view, decisions: { ...view.decisions, canSend: 'yes' as never } }).ok,
+    ).toBe(false);
   });
 
   it('narrows node variants and rejects unknown ones', () => {

src/app/brief/infrastructure/brief.adapter.ts

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ import { Result, ok, err } from '@shared/kernel/fp';
 import { runSubmit } from '@shared/application/submit';
 import {
   ApiClient,
+  BriefDecisionsDto,
   BriefDto,
   BriefStatusDto,
   BriefViewDto,
@@ -15,6 +16,7 @@ import {
 } from '@shared/infrastructure/api-client';
 import {
   Brief,
+  BriefDecisions,
   BriefStatus,
   LetterBlock,
   LetterSection,
@@ -35,6 +37,7 @@ import { Mark, Paragraph, RichTextBlock, RichTextNode } from '@shared/kernel/ric
 export interface BriefView {
   readonly brief: Brief;
   readonly availablePassages: LibraryPassage[];
+  readonly decisions: BriefDecisions;
 }
 
 export const BRIEF_LOAD_FAILED = $localize`:@@brief.load.failed:De brief kon niet worden geladen.`;
@@ -49,32 +52,32 @@ export class BriefAdapter {
     return r.ok ? parseBriefView(r.value) : r;
   }
 
-  async save(sections: readonly LetterSection[]): Promise<Result<string, Brief>> {
+  async save(sections: readonly LetterSection[]): Promise<Result<string, BriefView>> {
     const r = await runSubmit(
       () => this.client.briefPUT({ sections: sections.map(sectionToDto) }),
       BRIEF_ACTION_FAILED,
     );
-    return r.ok ? parseBrief(r.value) : r;
+    return r.ok ? parseBriefView(r.value) : r;
   }
 
-  async submit(): Promise<Result<string, Brief>> {
+  async submit(): Promise<Result<string, BriefView>> {
     const r = await runSubmit(() => this.client.briefSubmit(), BRIEF_ACTION_FAILED);
-    return r.ok ? parseBrief(r.value) : r;
+    return r.ok ? parseBriefView(r.value) : r;
   }
 
-  async approve(): Promise<Result<string, Brief>> {
+  async approve(): Promise<Result<string, BriefView>> {
     const r = await runSubmit(() => this.client.approve(), BRIEF_ACTION_FAILED);
-    return r.ok ? parseBrief(r.value) : r;
+    return r.ok ? parseBriefView(r.value) : r;
   }
 
-  async reject(comments: string): Promise<Result<string, Brief>> {
+  async reject(comments: string): Promise<Result<string, BriefView>> {
     const r = await runSubmit(() => this.client.reject({ comments }), BRIEF_ACTION_FAILED);
-    return r.ok ? parseBrief(r.value) : r;
+    return r.ok ? parseBriefView(r.value) : r;
   }
 
-  async send(): Promise<Result<string, Brief>> {
+  async send(): Promise<Result<string, BriefView>> {
     const r = await runSubmit(() => this.client.send(), BRIEF_ACTION_FAILED);
-    return r.ok ? parseBrief(r.value) : r;
+    return r.ok ? parseBriefView(r.value) : r;
   }
 
   /** Demo "start over" — recreate a fresh brief server-side and return the new view. */
@@ -281,17 +284,36 @@ export function parseBrief(dto: BriefDto): Result<string, Brief> {
   });
 }
 
+function parseDecisions(dto: BriefDecisionsDto | undefined): Result<string, BriefDecisions> {
+  if (
+    typeof dto?.canEdit !== 'boolean' ||
+    typeof dto.canApprove !== 'boolean' ||
+    typeof dto.canReject !== 'boolean' ||
+    typeof dto.canSend !== 'boolean'
+  ) {
+    return err('brief-view: missing/invalid decisions');
+  }
+  return ok({
+    canEdit: dto.canEdit,
+    canApprove: dto.canApprove,
+    canReject: dto.canReject,
+    canSend: dto.canSend,
+  });
+}
+
 export function parseBriefView(dto: BriefViewDto): Result<string, BriefView> {
   if (!dto.brief) return err('brief-view: missing brief');
   const brief = parseBrief(dto.brief);
   if (!brief.ok) return brief;
+  const decisions = parseDecisions(dto.decisions);
+  if (!decisions.ok) return decisions;
   const availablePassages: LibraryPassage[] = [];
   for (const p of dto.availablePassages ?? []) {
     const parsed = parsePassage(p);
     if (!parsed.ok) return parsed;
     availablePassages.push(parsed.value);
   }
-  return ok({ brief: brief.value, availablePassages });
+  return ok({ brief: brief.value, availablePassages, decisions: decisions.value });
 }
 
 // --- toDto: domain → wire, for save (collapses the union to the flat shape) ---

src/app/brief/ui/brief.page.ts

@@ -58,8 +58,10 @@ import { LetterComposerComponent } from '@brief/ui/letter-composer/letter-compos
             [brief]="brief()!"
             [availablePassages]="availablePassages()"
             [diagnostics]="store.diagnostics()"
-            [editable]="store.editable()"
+            [canEdit]="store.canEdit()"
-            [role]="store.role"
+            [canApprove]="store.canApprove()"
+            [canReject]="store.canReject()"
+            [canSend]="store.canSend()"
             [canSubmit]="store.canSubmit()"
             [busy]="store.busy()"
             (edit)="store.edit($event)"

src/app/brief/ui/letter-composer/letter-composer.component.ts

@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 import { Component, computed, input, output } from '@angular/core';
-import { Role } from '@shared/domain/role';
 import { HeadingComponent } from '@shared/ui/heading/heading.component';
 import { StatusBadgeComponent } from '@shared/ui/status-badge/status-badge.component';
 import { ButtonComponent } from '@shared/ui/button/button.component';
@@ -15,7 +14,9 @@ import { RejectionCommentsComponent } from '@brief/ui/rejection-comments/rejecti
 
 /** Organism: the whole letter — status badge, the editable sections (drafter) or a
     read-only preview (approver / locked), the diagnostics panel, and the action bar
-    appropriate to status × role. Presentational: emits edit + transition intents. */
+    appropriate to status × permission. Presentational: emits edit + transition
+    intents; the canEdit/canApprove/canReject/canSend inputs are server-computed
+    decision flags (PRD-0002 phase P1) — this component never derives them. */
 @Component({
   selector: 'app-letter-composer',
   imports: [
@@ -67,7 +68,7 @@ import { RejectionCommentsComponent } from '@brief/ui/rejection-comments/rejecti
       <app-rejection-comments mode="show" [comments]="rejectComments()" />
     }
 
-    @if (editable()) {
+    @if (canEdit()) {
       <div class="sections">
         @for (section of brief().sections; track section.sectionKey) {
           <app-letter-section
@@ -90,7 +91,7 @@ import { RejectionCommentsComponent } from '@brief/ui/rejection-comments/rejecti
     <div class="bar">
       @switch (status()) {
         @case ('draft') {
-          @if (editable()) {
+          @if (canEdit()) {
             <app-button
               variant="primary"
               [disabled]="!canSubmit() || busy()"
@@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ import { RejectionCommentsComponent } from '@brief/ui/rejection-comments/rejecti
           }
         }
         @case ('rejected') {
-          @if (editable()) {
+          @if (canEdit()) {
             <app-button
               variant="primary"
               [disabled]="!canSubmit() || busy()"
@@ -113,7 +114,7 @@ import { RejectionCommentsComponent } from '@brief/ui/rejection-comments/rejecti
           }
         }
         @case ('submitted') {
-          @if (role() === 'approver') {
+          @if (canApprove() || canReject()) {
             <app-button variant="primary" [disabled]="busy()" (click)="approve.emit()">{{
               approveLabel()
             }}</app-button>
@@ -123,10 +124,12 @@ import { RejectionCommentsComponent } from '@brief/ui/rejection-comments/rejecti
           }
         }
         @case ('approved') {
+          @if (canSend()) {
             <app-button variant="primary" [disabled]="busy()" (click)="send.emit()">{{
               sendLabel()
             }}</app-button>
           }
+        }
         @case ('sent') {
           <app-alert type="ok">{{ sentText() }}</app-alert>
         }
@@ -138,8 +141,10 @@ export class LetterComposerComponent {
   brief = input.required<Brief>();
   availablePassages = input<readonly LibraryPassage[]>([]);
   diagnostics = input<readonly Diagnostic[]>([]);
-  editable = input(false);
+  canEdit = input(false);
-  role = input.required<Role>();
+  canApprove = input(false);
+  canReject = input(false);
+  canSend = input(false);
   canSubmit = input(false);
   busy = input(false);
 

src/app/brief/ui/letter-composer/letter-composer.stories.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 import type { Meta, StoryObj } from '@storybook/angular';
 import { LetterComposerComponent } from './letter-composer.component';
-import { Brief, BriefStatus, LibraryPassage } from '@brief/domain/brief';
+import { Brief, BriefDecisions, BriefStatus, LibraryPassage } from '@brief/domain/brief';
 import { allDiagnostics } from '@brief/domain/brief';
 
 const passages: LibraryPassage[] = [
@@ -103,18 +103,18 @@ function brief(status: BriefStatus): Brief {
   };
 }
 
-const render = (b: Brief, editable: boolean, role: 'drafter' | 'approver') => ({
+const render = (b: Brief, decisions: BriefDecisions) => ({
   props: {
     brief: b,
     availablePassages: passages,
     diagnostics: allDiagnostics(b),
-    editable,
+    ...decisions,
-    role,
     canSubmit: true,
     busy: false,
   },
   template: `<app-letter-composer [brief]="brief" [availablePassages]="availablePassages" [diagnostics]="diagnostics"
-    [editable]="editable" [role]="role" [canSubmit]="canSubmit" [busy]="busy"></app-letter-composer>`,
+    [canEdit]="canEdit" [canApprove]="canApprove" [canReject]="canReject" [canSend]="canSend"
+    [canSubmit]="canSubmit" [busy]="busy"></app-letter-composer>`,
 });
 
 const meta: Meta<LetterComposerComponent> = {
@@ -125,15 +125,22 @@ export default meta;
 type Story = StoryObj<LetterComposerComponent>;
 
 export const DraftDrafter: Story = {
-  render: () => render(brief({ tag: 'draft' }), true, 'drafter'),
+  render: () =>
+    render(brief({ tag: 'draft' }), {
+      canEdit: true,
+      canApprove: false,
+      canReject: false,
+      canSend: false,
+    }),
 };
 export const SubmittedApprover: Story = {
   render: () =>
-    render(
+    render(brief({ tag: 'submitted', submittedBy: 'demo-drafter', submittedAt: '2026-07-01' }), {
-      brief({ tag: 'submitted', submittedBy: 'demo-drafter', submittedAt: '2026-07-01' }),
+      canEdit: false,
-      false,
+      canApprove: true,
-      'approver',
+      canReject: true,
-    ),
+      canSend: false,
+    }),
 };
 export const Rejected: Story = {
   render: () =>
@@ -144,10 +151,15 @@ export const Rejected: Story = {
         rejectedAt: '2026-07-01',
         comments: 'Graag de aanhef formeler.',
       }),
-      true,
+      { canEdit: true, canApprove: false, canReject: false, canSend: false },
-      'drafter',
     ),
 };
 export const Sent: Story = {
-  render: () => render(brief({ tag: 'sent', sentAt: '2026-07-01' }), false, 'drafter'),
+  render: () =>
+    render(brief({ tag: 'sent', sentAt: '2026-07-01' }), {
+      canEdit: false,
+      canApprove: false,
+      canReject: false,
+      canSend: false,
+    }),
 };

src/app/shared/application/access.store.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+import { Injectable, computed, inject } from '@angular/core';
+import { RemoteData, fromResource } from '@shared/application/remote-data';
+import { Capability } from '@shared/domain/capability';
+import { MeAdapter, parseMe } from '@shared/infrastructure/me.adapter';
+
+type Err = Error | undefined;
+
+/**
+ * The current principal's capabilities (PRD-0002 §6) — one root singleton, like
+ * `SessionStore`/`BigProfileStore`. Global capabilities load once from `GET /me`;
+ * a screen's own decision DTO (e.g. `BriefViewDto.decisions`) covers anything tied
+ * to a specific resource's live status — no extra round-trip needed for that.
+ *
+ * `can()` is deny-by-default: loading, failed, or an unrecognized capability all
+ * resolve to `false`. This store never derives a capability from a role — it only
+ * mirrors what the server already resolved.
+ */
+@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
+export class AccessStore {
+  private adapter = inject(MeAdapter);
+  private meRes = this.adapter.meResource();
+
+  private capabilities = computed<RemoteData<Err, Capability[]>>(() => {
+    const rd = fromResource(this.meRes);
+    if (rd.tag !== 'Success') return rd;
+    const parsed = parseMe(rd.value);
+    return parsed.ok
+      ? { tag: 'Success', value: parsed.value }
+      : { tag: 'Failure', error: new Error(parsed.error) };
+  });
+
+  can(capability: Capability): boolean {
+    const rd = this.capabilities();
+    return rd.tag === 'Success' && rd.value.includes(capability);
+  }
+}

src/app/shared/domain/capability.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+/**
+ * A stable, namespaced capability string (PRD-0002 §5a), e.g. `brief:approve`.
+ * Server-resolved and opaque to the FE — never derived from a role client-side.
+ */
+export type Capability = 'brief:approve' | 'brief:reject' | 'brief:send';

src/app/shared/infrastructure/api-client.ts

@@ -930,6 +930,42 @@ export class ApiClient {
         return Promise.resolve<SubmitApplicationResponse>(null as any);
     }
 
+    /**
+     * @return OK
+     */
+    me(): Promise<MeDto> {
+        let url_ = this.baseUrl + "/api/v1/me";
+        url_ = url_.replace(/[?&]$/, "");
+
+        let options_: RequestInit = {
+            method: "GET",
+            headers: {
+                "Accept": "application/json"
+            }
+        };
+
+        return this.http.fetch(url_, options_).then((_response: Response) => {
+            return this.processMe(_response);
+        });
+    }
+
+    protected processMe(response: Response): Promise<MeDto> {
+        const status = response.status;
+        let _headers: any = {}; if (response.headers && response.headers.forEach) { response.headers.forEach((v: any, k: any) => _headers[k] = v); };
+        if (status === 200) {
+            return response.text().then((_responseText) => {
+            let result200: any = null;
+            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as MeDto;
+            return result200;
+            });
+        } else if (status !== 200 && status !== 204) {
+            return response.text().then((_responseText) => {
+            return throwException("An unexpected server error occurred.", status, _responseText, _headers);
+            });
+        }
+        return Promise.resolve<MeDto>(null as any);
+    }
+
     /**
      * @return OK
      */
@@ -969,7 +1005,7 @@ export class ApiClient {
     /**
      * @return OK
      */
-    briefPUT(body: SaveBriefRequest): Promise<BriefDto> {
+    briefPUT(body: SaveBriefRequest): Promise<BriefViewDto> {
         let url_ = this.baseUrl + "/api/v1/brief";
         url_ = url_.replace(/[?&]$/, "");
 
@@ -989,13 +1025,13 @@ export class ApiClient {
         });
     }
 
-    protected processBriefPUT(response: Response): Promise<BriefDto> {
+    protected processBriefPUT(response: Response): Promise<BriefViewDto> {
         const status = response.status;
         let _headers: any = {}; if (response.headers && response.headers.forEach) { response.headers.forEach((v: any, k: any) => _headers[k] = v); };
         if (status === 200) {
             return response.text().then((_responseText) => {
             let result200: any = null;
-            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as BriefDto;
+            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as BriefViewDto;
             return result200;
             });
         } else if (status === 403) {
@@ -1015,13 +1051,13 @@ export class ApiClient {
             return throwException("An unexpected server error occurred.", status, _responseText, _headers);
             });
         }
-        return Promise.resolve<BriefDto>(null as any);
+        return Promise.resolve<BriefViewDto>(null as any);
     }
 
     /**
      * @return OK
      */
-    briefSubmit(): Promise<BriefDto> {
+    briefSubmit(): Promise<BriefViewDto> {
         let url_ = this.baseUrl + "/api/v1/brief/submit";
         url_ = url_.replace(/[?&]$/, "");
 
@@ -1037,13 +1073,13 @@ export class ApiClient {
         });
     }
 
-    protected processBriefSubmit(response: Response): Promise<BriefDto> {
+    protected processBriefSubmit(response: Response): Promise<BriefViewDto> {
         const status = response.status;
         let _headers: any = {}; if (response.headers && response.headers.forEach) { response.headers.forEach((v: any, k: any) => _headers[k] = v); };
         if (status === 200) {
             return response.text().then((_responseText) => {
             let result200: any = null;
-            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as BriefDto;
+            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as BriefViewDto;
             return result200;
             });
         } else if (status === 403) {
@@ -1063,13 +1099,13 @@ export class ApiClient {
             return throwException("An unexpected server error occurred.", status, _responseText, _headers);
             });
         }
-        return Promise.resolve<BriefDto>(null as any);
+        return Promise.resolve<BriefViewDto>(null as any);
     }
 
     /**
      * @return OK
      */
-    approve(): Promise<BriefDto> {
+    approve(): Promise<BriefViewDto> {
         let url_ = this.baseUrl + "/api/v1/brief/approve";
         url_ = url_.replace(/[?&]$/, "");
 
@@ -1085,13 +1121,13 @@ export class ApiClient {
         });
     }
 
-    protected processApprove(response: Response): Promise<BriefDto> {
+    protected processApprove(response: Response): Promise<BriefViewDto> {
         const status = response.status;
         let _headers: any = {}; if (response.headers && response.headers.forEach) { response.headers.forEach((v: any, k: any) => _headers[k] = v); };
         if (status === 200) {
             return response.text().then((_responseText) => {
             let result200: any = null;
-            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as BriefDto;
+            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as BriefViewDto;
             return result200;
             });
         } else if (status === 403) {
@@ -1111,13 +1147,13 @@ export class ApiClient {
             return throwException("An unexpected server error occurred.", status, _responseText, _headers);
             });
         }
-        return Promise.resolve<BriefDto>(null as any);
+        return Promise.resolve<BriefViewDto>(null as any);
     }
 
     /**
      * @return OK
      */
-    reject(body: RejectBriefRequest): Promise<BriefDto> {
+    reject(body: RejectBriefRequest): Promise<BriefViewDto> {
         let url_ = this.baseUrl + "/api/v1/brief/reject";
         url_ = url_.replace(/[?&]$/, "");
 
@@ -1137,13 +1173,13 @@ export class ApiClient {
         });
     }
 
-    protected processReject(response: Response): Promise<BriefDto> {
+    protected processReject(response: Response): Promise<BriefViewDto> {
         const status = response.status;
         let _headers: any = {}; if (response.headers && response.headers.forEach) { response.headers.forEach((v: any, k: any) => _headers[k] = v); };
         if (status === 200) {
             return response.text().then((_responseText) => {
             let result200: any = null;
-            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as BriefDto;
+            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as BriefViewDto;
             return result200;
             });
         } else if (status === 403) {
@@ -1163,13 +1199,13 @@ export class ApiClient {
             return throwException("An unexpected server error occurred.", status, _responseText, _headers);
             });
         }
-        return Promise.resolve<BriefDto>(null as any);
+        return Promise.resolve<BriefViewDto>(null as any);
     }
 
     /**
      * @return OK
      */
-    send(): Promise<BriefDto> {
+    send(): Promise<BriefViewDto> {
         let url_ = this.baseUrl + "/api/v1/brief/send";
         url_ = url_.replace(/[?&]$/, "");
 
@@ -1185,13 +1221,13 @@ export class ApiClient {
         });
     }
 
-    protected processSend(response: Response): Promise<BriefDto> {
+    protected processSend(response: Response): Promise<BriefViewDto> {
         const status = response.status;
         let _headers: any = {}; if (response.headers && response.headers.forEach) { response.headers.forEach((v: any, k: any) => _headers[k] = v); };
         if (status === 200) {
             return response.text().then((_responseText) => {
             let result200: any = null;
-            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as BriefDto;
+            result200 = _responseText === "" ? null : JSON.parse(_responseText, this.jsonParseReviver) as BriefViewDto;
             return result200;
             });
         } else if (status === 409) {
@@ -1205,7 +1241,7 @@ export class ApiClient {
             return throwException("An unexpected server error occurred.", status, _responseText, _headers);
             });
         }
-        return Promise.resolve<BriefDto>(null as any);
+        return Promise.resolve<BriefViewDto>(null as any);
     }
 
     /**
@@ -1287,6 +1323,13 @@ export interface ApplicationSummaryDto {
     submittedAt?: string | undefined;
 }
 
+export interface BriefDecisionsDto {
+    canEdit?: boolean;
+    canApprove?: boolean;
+    canReject?: boolean;
+    canSend?: boolean;
+}
+
 export interface BriefDto {
     briefId?: string | undefined;
     beroep?: string | undefined;
@@ -1312,6 +1355,7 @@ export interface BriefStatusDto {
 export interface BriefViewDto {
     brief?: BriefDto;
     availablePassages?: LibraryPassageDto[] | undefined;
+    decisions?: BriefDecisionsDto;
 }
 
 export interface BrpAddressDto {
@@ -1423,6 +1467,10 @@ export interface ManualDiplomaPolicyDto {
     policyQuestions?: PolicyQuestionDto[] | undefined;
 }
 
+export interface MeDto {
+    capabilities?: string[] | undefined;
+}
+
 export interface ParagraphDto {
     nodes?: RichTextNodeDto[] | undefined;
     list?: string | undefined;

src/app/shared/infrastructure/me.adapter.spec.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
+import { parseMe } from './me.adapter';
+
+describe('parseMe (trust boundary)', () => {
+  it('parses a known capability list', () => {
+    const r = parseMe({ capabilities: ['brief:approve', 'brief:reject', 'brief:send'] });
+    expect(r).toEqual({ ok: true, value: ['brief:approve', 'brief:reject', 'brief:send'] });
+  });
+
+  it('parses an empty list (drafter — no capabilities)', () => {
+    expect(parseMe({ capabilities: [] })).toEqual({ ok: true, value: [] });
+  });
+
+  it('drops unrecognized capability strings instead of rejecting the response', () => {
+    const r = parseMe({ capabilities: ['brief:approve', 'unknown:future-thing'] });
+    expect(r).toEqual({ ok: true, value: ['brief:approve'] });
+  });
+
+  it('rejects malformed responses instead of trusting them', () => {
+    expect(parseMe(null).ok).toBe(false);
+    expect(parseMe({}).ok).toBe(false);
+    expect(parseMe({ capabilities: 'brief:approve' }).ok).toBe(false);
+  });
+});

src/app/shared/infrastructure/me.adapter.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+import { Injectable, inject, resource } from '@angular/core';
+import { Result, ok, err } from '@shared/kernel/fp';
+import { Capability } from '@shared/domain/capability';
+import { ApiClient } from '@shared/infrastructure/api-client';
+
+const KNOWN: readonly Capability[] = ['brief:approve', 'brief:reject', 'brief:send'];
+
+/**
+ * Infrastructure adapter for `GET /me` (PRD-0002 §6): the current principal's
+ * coarse, role-derived capabilities — nav/menu-level, not tied to any one screen's
+ * live status (contrast a screen's own decision DTO, e.g. `BriefViewDto.decisions`).
+ */
+@Injectable({ providedIn: 'root' })
+export class MeAdapter {
+  private client = inject(ApiClient);
+
+  meResource() {
+    return resource({ loader: () => this.client.me() });
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Trust-boundary parse. An unrecognized capability string is dropped rather than
+ * rejecting the whole response — deny-by-default already covers it (AccessStore.can
+ * returns false for anything not in the set), and it lets the backend grow the
+ * capability list without breaking an older FE build.
+ */
+export function parseMe(json: unknown): Result<string, Capability[]> {
+  if (typeof json !== 'object' || json === null) return err('me: not an object');
+  const dto = json as { capabilities?: unknown };
+  if (!Array.isArray(dto.capabilities)) return err('me: missing/invalid capabilities');
+  return ok(dto.capabilities.filter((c): c is Capability => KNOWN.includes(c as Capability)));
+}

src/app/shared/infrastructure/role.ts

@@ -5,8 +5,10 @@ import { Role } from '@shared/domain/role';
  * POC has one faked self-service user and no real identities, so the two-person
  * letter workflow (drafter vs approver) is driven by a `?role=` query param —
  * exactly the pattern of the `?scenario=` toggle. The backend receives it as an
- * `X-Role` header (see role.interceptor) and enforces the approver≠drafter rule;
+ * `X-Role` header (see role.interceptor), resolves it into a `Principal`
- * the FE derives `editable` from it.
+ * server-side, and is the sole authority on what that principal may do (PRD-0002
+ * phase P1, `Authz.Can`) — the FE only renders the resulting decision flags, it no
+ * longer derives permission from this value itself.
  */
 export function currentRole(): Role {
   return new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get('role') === 'approver'