ADR-0001's own canonical "config value" example was unenforced: GET
/intake/policy echoed ScholingThreshold, but no request DTO carried a
scholing answer, so the server had nothing to re-validate. A crafted
POST could skip a requirement the wizard presents as mandatory.
IntakePolicy.RejectIncompleteScholing is the authority — three-valued
completeness (below threshold an answer is required; "nee" is legal and
still submits; punten only belong to a followed scholing), living in the
class that owns the constant so scripts/check-seam.sh keeps guarding the
FE/BE literal pair. Both submit paths call it; a violation 400s with
ProblemDetails and leaves the aanvraag a Concept. Gated on
Type == "intake" (the endpoint's switch lumps herregistratie with
intake, which has no scholing question), and guarded by `reject is null`
so a zero-uren submission is still decided on its merits.
Also fixes a live FE bug in the same rule: validateStep required punten
whenever scholingGevolgd was 'ja' regardless of lageUren, while the
template renders those fields only when lageUren — so answering 'ja'
then raising uren either blocked the user on an invisible field or
emitted aanvullendeScholing: undefined alongside punten. punten now
derives from aanvullendeScholing, so that combination is unrepresentable
in ValidIntake.
Note: EndpointTests' Worked_hours_submission_succeeds was itself
asserting the vulnerable payload ({ uren: 40 }, no answer) and needed a
complete answer added; the zero-hours rows are the ordering regression
net and are unmodified.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
bdd.mdx previously banned "Given/When/Then ceremony" outright, which
directly contradicted WP-70's own acceptance tests (Acceptance/
BesluitLifecycleTests.cs already used // Given/When/Then comments) and
the backend's organically-evolved PascalCase_snake_sentence convention,
which the doc gave zero guidance for. Reverses that rule: every test is
now structured Given -> When -> Then, with a genuinely empty phase
omitted rather than faked; present-tense declarative naming and the
one-behaviour-per-test rule are unchanged. ADR-0006 gets a cross-reference
so both documents agree everywhere, not just in acceptance tests.
Also closes out the doc's other named-but-unenforced rules found by the
audit: fixes the 5 files asserting rendered $localize copy instead of
the underlying tag/message-id (the compliant pattern already existed in
werkvoorraad-item-view.spec.ts), splits the multi-behaviour titles the
doc itself calls a smell (";", "and", "/"), and fixes bdd.mdx's own false
citation of registratie-wizard.machine.spec.ts as "one transition per
test" by actually splitting that test into one-transition-per-test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Writes up the principle behind WP-70's three tracks ("build test data
through the same door production code uses") as ADR-0006, with a decision
table for which fixture idiom fits which test type. Updates the
test-strategy skill (adds the Fixtures rule, fixes its stale pre-monorepo
src/app/... worked-example paths) and the shared Storybook testing.mdx page
to match. Closes WP-70 with the signatures/counts as actually shipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
npm run ci passed fully green (lint, format, tokens, all four test suites, both
localized builds, audit, backend dotnet test at 216 passing, snippet + api-client
drift checks). npm run e2e could not be verified this session: port 4200 was
occupied by an unrelated container from a different repo, so Playwright reused it
instead of starting this app — a pre-existing local port collision, not a
regression, and not part of the local GREEN gate per CLAUDE.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The doc-comment claimed "the backend re-validates on submit as the authority" —
it doesn't. Neither SubmitApplicationRequest nor IntakeRequest carries a scholing
answer at all, so there's nothing to re-validate; both submit paths only apply
SubmissionRules.RejectZeroUren. A crafted POST can bypass the scholing requirement
entirely. States the gap and points to WP-69 (opened, not yet planned) for the
enforcement, which needs a wire change.
Also strengthens the F2 concurrency test to assert the persisted status matches
whichever request actually won the race, and updates WP-68's own Decisions/
acceptance-criteria text to reflect two implementation choices that improved on
the original write-up once real constraints surfaced: ProcessingWindow stays on
ApplicationStore (StatusAt is already in the same file), and AanvraagStatusTag is
not given a Concept member (would have broken
AanvraagStatusTag_covers_the_published_lifecycle) — AanvraagStatus.Tag is nullable
instead, null exactly for Concept.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Architecture review found the context boundaries, FP/TEA idioms and read/write
separation sound, and rejected explicit CQRS as the fix for anything found. It
located four real defects clustered in one place: the backend's aggregate roots
don't guard their own invariants, and the aanvraag status lifecycle is a computed
string living in the contracts layer instead of the domain. Full Decisions block
pre-made so implementation can proceed without re-litigating scope.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
POST /beoordeling/{id}/besluit always 404'd against a real OpenZaak: {id} is the
FE-facing case id from IZaakSource.ListCases, which under OpenZaakZaakSource is the
ZGW zaak's own uuid, not ApplicationStore's primary key. Resolve the case through
ListCases first (same seam the GET sibling already uses), then to the local Aanvraag
via its Referentie — the one identifier stable across both sources.
Adds ApplicationStore.GetByReferentie and a regression test that reproduces the
divergence with a decorating IZaakSource test double instead of a live OpenZaak.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Extends IZaakSource with RecordBesluit, mirroring WP-50's CreateZaak write
pattern: OpenZaakZaakSource POSTs a new Statussen entry (highest-volgnummer
statustype, since the harness catalogus has no per-outcome besluittype),
carrying the besluit + toelichting in statustoelichting; LocalZaakSource
no-ops. The beoordeling endpoint calls it after the local decision commits,
flagging a failure via RecordZgwDivergence the same way submit's
create-zaak/document writes do — closing WP-60's "second write pair" gap.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
WP-65's summary-table row still said "in progress (65a done)" from before
65b shipped, and that one oversized cell was forcing prettier to want to
re-pad the entire ~65-row table. Correcting it to "done" (its actual
status, per the WP-65 file's own outcome notes) removes the outlier —
npm run format:check is green again with zero other rows touched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds POST /beoordeling/{id}/besluit: a Besluit enum (Goedkeuren/Afwijzen/
MeerInfoOpvragen) backed by new Aanvraag.BesluitStatus/BesluitToelichting
columns, gated by the same BeoordelingRules.CanDecide the read side's
canBesluiten flag already uses (409 on an illegal transition, 400 on a
missing required toelichting). Mappers.ToStatusDto gains the "a recorded
decision wins" branch. FE: besluit.machine.ts + besluit-form organism
(same form idiom as change-request-form), wired into the beoordeling page
behind the server's canBesluiten flag.
Completes WP-65 (65a + 65b) — verified end-to-end against a running
backend (werkvoorraad -> beoordeling -> besluit -> status reflected back).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New GET /beoordeling/{id} shows one aanvraag's status, linked documents, and a
canBesluiten decision flag, gated by the same CanBeoordelen capability as the
werkvoorraad list. Reads through IZaakSource.ListCases rather than a new seam
method (WP-66 needs one anyway for the real write); owner BSN is masked.
Fixes a real gap found while wiring this up: the behandelportal's login was still
WP-61's copied citizen/BSN DigiD flow, so nothing ever sent X-Medewerker and the
werkvoorraad screen (WP-64) always denied in a real browser. A dev-only
medewerkerInterceptor (mirrors the existing ?role= stand-in as ?rollen=) fixes that.
WP-65's own Risks note authorized splitting read from write across sessions given
its size; this is the read half. The decision-recording mutation is next (65b).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New GET /werkvoorraad endpoint lists aanvragen still open (Ingediend/InBehandeling),
gated by the medewerker capability (CanBeoordelen) rather than the admin role — reuses
the existing ApplicationSummaryDto, no new DTO. GET /me now surfaces aanvraag:beoordelen
for a behandelaar so the FE can gate with the same AccessStore/capabilityGuard idiom
every other page uses.
FE: a behandeling domain type deliberately narrower than ssp's full AanvraagStatus
union (only the two open tags — illegal states unrepresentable), composed into a
werkvoorraad-list organism from existing shared/ui molecules. Replaces WP-61's
scaffold placeholder as the app's real landing page.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Restructures into apps/ssp + apps/behandelportal (two Angular projects)
plus libs/shared + libs/beheer (cross-app libraries), replacing WP-61's
separate sibling repo. That split had already produced real drift: a
hand-vendored copy of the backend's OpenAPI doc, a shared/ui+layout tree
forked and silently diverging (7 files), and beheer + the styles.scss
token bridge duplicated byte-for-byte across both repos.
- git mv the SSP's src/app/* into apps/ssp/; fold shared/, beheer/,
environments/, the Storybook docs/*.mdx, and styles.scss into
libs/shared + libs/beheer (all confirmed identical between the two
repos before merging). auth stays deliberately duplicated per
ADR-0002 (actor-specific, expected to diverge) - amended there.
- One generated API client (libs/shared), no more vendored swagger.json.
- .dependency-cruiser split into a base factory + one config per app,
and Storybook into .storybook-ssp/.storybook-behandelportal - both
forced by the @auth/* alias resolving to different directories per app.
- SiteHeaderComponent/ShellComponent gained HEADER_NAV_ITEMS/
HEADER_ADMIN_LINKS/DEBUG_PANEL injection tokens so each app supplies
its own nav/admin-links/dev-panel instead of one being hardcoded.
- CLAUDE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, dependencies.md, and ADR-0002 updated;
WP-67 backlog entry documents the full decision trail.
npm run ci green (lint, dep:check x2, 360 tests across ssp/
behandelportal/shared/beheer, both localized builds, backend tests,
snippet + api-client drift); both dev servers, both Storybook
instances, and docker compose verified working.
The old sibling repo (/home/eho/repos/behandelportal) is left
untouched, not deleted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Model the full ADR-0002 lifecycle (Ingediend/InBehandeling/
MeerInfoGevraagd/Goedgekeurd/Afgewezen) as a backend enum backing the
existing AanvraagStatusDto.Tag string, and widen the FE union/parse
boundary/switches to match. Ingediend/MeerInfoGevraagd aren't reachable
yet (no behandelaar transition exists) — that's WP-65. Zero DTO shape
change, so gen:api has no drift.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Splits backend CallerIdentity into the two ADR-0002 §3 actor kinds
(ZorgverlenerCaller/MedewerkerCaller), a stub X-Medewerker/X-Rollen header
path mirroring WP-53's citizen stub, and Authz.CanBeoordelen as the first
medewerker capability — backend-only, no consumer until WP-64. Also fixes
the backlog README's stale WP-61 status (done, but table said todo).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
WP-61 (bootstrap the behandelportal app) is done — a separate sibling repo
at /home/eho/repos/behandelportal, not a commit in this one. Records the
one real kickoff deviation from the vanilla new-ssp recipe: create-ssp.mjs
unconditionally renames the backend project even with --skip-backend, which
conflicts with the WP's "no new backend service" decision. Resolved by
deleting backend/ from the new repo and vendoring its swagger.json into
api-contract/ instead, with gen:api regenerating only the client against
that vendored doc.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Renamed scripts/create-ssp.mjs -> create-frontend.mjs (+ its WP-45 doc, npm
script, and every prose/command reference) since "ssp" reads as an acronym
where "create-frontend" says what it does.
Also fixes two real bugs found while running it for real during WP-61:
scripts/ci-local.sh was missing from RENAME_CONTENT_FILES (any --name'd
clone that keeps a backend would break `npm run ci`, still hardcoding
BigRegister.slnx), and plopfile.mjs's `gen:context` insertion into
.dependency-cruiser.js anchored on the `showcase: null,` line, which
create-ssp/create-frontend has already stripped by the time gen:context
runs in the same invocation — silently leaving a freshly scaffolded
context with no CONTEXT_ALLOWED fence entry at all. Re-anchored on the
`const CONTEXT_ALLOWED = {` line instead, which never moves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Local aanvraag/document writes and their paired ZGW writes aren't
transactional; a ZGW failure after the local write succeeds used to
diverge silently. ZgwHttpClient now retries transport-shaped failures
(not 500, which can follow a partial commit on the non-idempotent
statussen/rollen POSTs), and a ZGW failure that survives retry sets
Aanvraag.ZgwError plus a zgw:divergence audit row instead of failing
or diverging quietly. No outbox/reconcile job: three request-triggered
write paths don't justify a persisted queue that would also need to
carry citizen PII for the JWT audit claims.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Drives the DRC upload's vertrouwelijkheidaanduiding from a new stamdata
table instead of the hardcoded "openbaar", following the existing
config-as-code pattern (ADR-0004). Adds the referential-integrity check
StamdataValidationTests was missing for the new table.
OpenZaak doesn't serve the Notificaties API itself (it's a separate app,
open-notificaties) — standing one up for a real abonnement would triple
this harness for a benefit it doesn't need (exactly one subscriber, this
repo's own BFF). Instead, an opt-in compose overlay adds a celery worker
and points OpenZaak's NotificationsConfig straight at the BFF's webhook
via a zgw_consumers Service; bootstrap-notificaties.sh configures it
idempotently and verify-notificatie.sh proves a real write delivers to
the BFF's audit trail end-to-end.
Verified live: preflight proves the webhook's shared-secret gate both
ways (204/401), a zaak PATCH triggers real celery delivery, and rerunning
both scripts against an already-configured harness stays idempotent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
setup_configuration has no YAML field for granular autorisaties, so
bigregister-test now starts at heeft_alle_autorisaties: false (dev + prod
template) and bootstrap-catalogus.sh grants exactly the ztc/zrc scopes the
harness needs via the Django ORM, sidestepping the zero-scope
chicken-and-egg with the JWT-authenticated Autorisaties REST API.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
bootstrap-catalogus.sh now looks up every resource by its natural key before
creating it (catalogus by domein+rsin, zaaktype by catalogus+identificatie,
statustype by zaaktype+volgnummer, roltype by zaaktype+omschrijvingGeneriek,
zaaktype-publish by checking `concept` first, zaak by identificatie,
status/rol by existence-under-the-zaak), so rerunning against an
already-seeded instance reuses what's there instead of erroring.
The WP's original plan (move this into OpenZaak's `setup_configuration`
mechanism) turned out not to be achievable: reading the actual
django_setup_configuration steps installed inside the open-zaak image shows
no step exists for Catalogi/Zaken content anywhere in this OpenZaak version
— only sites/credentials/applicaties/selectielijst. Documented as a
deviation; the WP's own Risks section already anticipated this and sanctioned
falling back to an idempotent script.
Verified live: fresh instance -> full run (all created) -> integration test
green -> reran the script twice more against the same instance (all reused,
identical URLs, no duplicates) -> integration test still green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml layers real SECRET_KEY/DB password/site
domain/allowed-hosts (all required, fail-fast via ${VAR:?...}) on top of the
WP-54 dev harness, switches Postgres off trust auth, and sets IS_HTTPS for a
front-facing reverse-proxy TLS setup. The ZGW client secret lives inside a
file setup_configuration reads rather than a compose env var, so it's
templated (data.prod.yaml.template, no secret) and rendered host-side via
render-prod-secrets.sh into a gitignored data.prod.yaml, mounted over the
container's dev data.yaml. ZgwOptions.cs already binds from IConfiguration,
so the BFF side needed no code change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
WP-55..60 harden the OpenZaak integration for production (secrets/TLS,
idempotent provisioning, least-privilege scopes, real notifications,
confidentialiteit config, write-divergence resilience). WP-61..66 stand up
a staff-facing behandelportal per ADR-0002, wired to the same backend via
BFF-lite decision DTOs. Both phases are independent tracks; WP-60's
Decisions block is deliberately left open for a planner-agent kickoff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The watched push came back all-green after ebf1f8f (the non-root Dockerfile
fix semgrep's live run caught). Marks the entire showcase/ZGW backlog
(WP-05..54) done.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Records what's implemented (items 1/3/4/5/6), what's deliberately skipped
this round (item 2, blocked on act_runner access), and that the WP can't be
marked fully done until a real Gitea run confirms the CI-timing/path-filter
behavior this environment can't observe. npm run ci confirmed green locally.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Opt-in docker-compose (postgres+redis+OpenZaak, no celery/nginx) +
bootstrap-catalogus.sh seed a real OpenZaak instance; OpenZaakIntegrationTests
(Category=Integration, excluded from default dotnet test/CI) proves the ZGW
seam against it for the first time. That live run caught a real bug:
ZgwHttpClient never sent Content-Crs/Accept-Crs headers, so every write would
412 against a spec-compliant OpenZaak — fixed alongside the harness.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replaces the hardcoded DocumentStore.DemoOwner and the static ZgwOptions
UserId/UserRepresentation with one per-request CallerIdentity, resolved by a
pluggable IIdentityProvider (StubIdentityProvider reads X-Role/X-Subject
today; a real OIDC/DigiD provider swaps in without touching any consumer).
- Domain/Authorization/{CallerIdentity,IIdentityProvider,StubIdentityProvider}.cs
+ a resolution middleware in Program.cs, right after correlation-id.
- Authz.ResolvePrincipal(ctx) keeps its signature (now reads ctx.Caller().Role),
so its ~15 call sites needed no changes.
- Every endpoint that passed DocumentStore.DemoOwner to a store now passes
ctx.Caller().Bsn.
- ZgwTokenProvider gains Mint(CallerIdentity) alongside the original Mint()
(kept for calls not tied to one citizen); ZgwHttpClient threads an optional
caller through to pick the right overload.
- IZaakSource gains ListMyCases(caller, now) — the citizen-scoped read
OpenZaakZaakSource backs with ZGW's rol__...__inpBsn filter. GET /applications
now routes through it instead of ApplicationStore directly, closing the last
"reads a static store" gap for a citizen-facing endpoint.
Backend 159/159 tests (+8, incl. an HTTP-level two-identity scoping proof),
npm run ci green, no api-client drift.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Endpoint/DTO/options landed already in c4dd846; this closes the loop with
NotificatieTests.cs (accept/reject/missing-header, asserting the AuthzAuditStore
row), missing appsettings.json keys (also backfills DrcBaseUrl/
InformatieobjecttypeUrls, stale since WP-51), and the webhook + abonnement
provisioning docs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Extends the OpenZaak seam with IDocumentSource, sibling of IZaakSource
(WP-49/50): an upload always lands locally first (DocumentStore stays
the record of truth for preview/download/audit) and, when
Zgw:Enabled=true, is also registered as a DRC enkelvoudiginformatie-
object; once a zaak exists (IZaakSource.CreateZaak now also returns
its ZaakUrl), submit links each document to it via zaakinformatie-
object. FE upload/list DTOs are unchanged.
- ZgwOptions gains DrcBaseUrl + a category->informatieobjecttype URL
map (the document analogue of ZaaktypeUrls).
- LocalDocumentSource is the same DocumentStore.Add/Link calls the
endpoints used to make inline — zero behaviour change offline.
- OpenZaakDocumentSource POSTs the eio then the zaak link, persisting
the DRC url (DocumentStore.SetDrcUrl) so linking doesn't re-upload.
- Factored the GET/POST-with-bearer-JWT plumbing shared with
OpenZaakZaakSource into ZgwHttpClient; shared the stub handler
between the two source test classes as ZgwStubHandler.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Extends the IZaakSource seam (WP-49, read-only) with CreateZaak: submitting
an aanvraag now also registers a Zaak + Status + Rol in OpenZaak when
Zgw:Enabled=true, routed through the existing /applications/{id}/submit
endpoint with the FE response DTO unchanged (ADR-0001/ADR-0005 — the
endpoint never branches on the config flag itself, DI already picked the
implementation).
- ZgwOptions gains a Type→zaaktype-URL map + the two RSINs a Zaak needs.
- LocalZaakSource.CreateZaak is a pure passthrough of what the endpoint
already computes locally (zero behaviour change for the offline default).
- OpenZaakZaakSource.CreateZaak POSTs the zaak (identificatie = the same
local reference, so both stay in sync), resolves + POSTs the initial
status and the initiator rol (BSN) via Catalogi lookups, and maps the
result back into the submit response.
- Marked ponytail shortcuts: first-statustype/roltype-Catalogi-returns
(no per-type config) and no compensating transaction on partial failure
— both fine for a first slice against a demo backend.
Verified: full `npm run ci` green, zero api-client drift, 144/144 backend
tests (142 existing + 2 new stub-handler tests asserting the POST bodies
+ type→zaaktype mapping per the acceptance criteria).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes phase 6 (Brief v2): a demo script mapping shipped scenarios to
URL+click paths (no Brief v2 PRD ever existed to translate one from —
written directly against the code instead), one e2e spec covering
compose→approve→send and admin republish→drafter-sees-it, and
Storybook state gaps (rejection diff, read-only viewer, org logo,
upload rejection) that prior WPs left uncovered. Flags passage-picker
as dead code, superseded by besluit-panel.
npm run e2e is not verified green in this sandbox — see WP-28's
Deviations section; the pre-existing, unmodified smoke.spec.ts fails
identically here, pointing at a sandbox rendering issue rather than a
regression.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pin the model to the step, not the whole session, via .claude/agents/*.md frontmatter
instead of relying on a human to run /model at the right moment: planner (Opus, no
Edit/Write) for design work, developer (Sonnet) for implementation, task-runner (Haiku,
no Edit/Write) for mechanical read-only checks. CLAUDE.md documents the routing rule;
the backlog session protocol now names these agents instead of a manual /model instruction.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
npm run gen:context scaffolds a bounded context: folders + starter page, the @<ctx>/*
tsconfig alias, a dependency-cruiser boundary entry, and a lazy authGuard route.
Refactors .dependency-cruiser.js's per-context contextRule calls into a single
CONTEXT_ALLOWED map that every rule derives from, so adding a context is really one
config entry (verified behavior-preserving: same dep:check counts, same graph output).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
WP-27's Decisions said undo/redo is a hand-rolled past/future: Brief[] stack in
BriefStore. WP-31 later extracted that into the shared createHistory<T> helper
(the backlog's own phase-7 ordering note says as much: "32 reuses the
createHistory helper 31 extracts") — BriefStore now calls .record/.undo/.redo on
it, same cap-50/push-on-edit/clear-on-new-edit semantics. Noted the supersession
rather than leaving the WP describing code that no longer exists verbatim.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
WP-19: the Files section still described the originally-planned CI approach
(background servers with & + wait-on); the actual implementation (documented in
ci.yml's own comment and playwright.config.ts) moved server lifecycle into
Playwright's webServer to fix the 2-hour e2e hang. Recorded as a Deviation entry
and corrected the Files section to match reality. Spot-checked the rest of the WP
(retryClicked wiring, the currentScenario() claim, the still-open retry gaps in
registration-detail/aanvraag-detail/brief) against current code — all still hold.
Session protocol: replace the removed model mandate with per-step guidance —
Opus for planning, Sonnet for implementation, Haiku subagents for simple
read-only CLI checks — so cost matches the step's difficulty, not the whole WP.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Session protocol shouldn't dictate which model to use — WPs (including the new
WP-53/54) are written to be executable regardless of model.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The two highest-value OpenZaak roadmap gaps, each written self-contained (a "current
state" handoff section) so a fresh session can execute from the file + repo alone:
- WP-53: replace the stubbed owner/BSN with a real per-request CallerIdentity
(pluggable stub, not DigiD), threading it into Authz, the ZGW JWT user claims, and
a citizen-scoped read (rol__…__inpBsn). Production-blocking for a real deployment.
- WP-54: a separate docker-compose OpenZaak + scripted bootstrap + opt-in
Category=Integration test — makes 50/51/52 developable against a live instance
instead of only fixtures; kept out of the default gate.
Indexed in the backlog README (rows + phase-9 ordering note) and cited from
openzaak-integration.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- test-storybook:ci gets --maxWorkers=2 so the Jest runner stops spawning one
headless Chromium per core and OOM-ing the Gitea runner host (the root cause).
- storybook-a11y job gains a container resource ceiling (--cpus=2 --memory=4g) as
a belt-and-suspenders guardrail; noted it needs a docker-mode act_runner.
- openzaak-integration.md: add "Anti-corruption layer — two nested boundaries"
teaching section (BFF ACL vs upstreams + FE ACL vs BFF, and the principles).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Stamdata: add beroepen, opleidingen (temporal), and specialismen tables to the
schema-driven catalog (zero UI code). opleidingen.beroep and specialismen.beroep
both reference beroepen.code — the first stamdata->stamdata references, enforced by
two new StamdataRef entries in the CI gate.
OpenZaak/ZGW (WP-49, slice 1 — read-only zaken): introduce IZaakSource as the cases
read seam. Default LocalZaakSource reads the local SQLite store (offline); an
OpenZaakZaakSource (Zgw/ client: HS256 per-call JWT, ZGW->existing-DTO mapper,
paginating HTTP source) is selected behind Zgw:Enabled (default false). The FE never
changes — same ApplicationSummaryDto, no api-client drift. Unit-tested with fixtures
+ a stub HttpMessageHandler; no live OpenZaak needed.
Docs: ADR-0005, reference/openzaak-integration.md, WP-49..52 roadmap, stamdata.md
update, README index rows.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Index roles-and-access, dependencies, and dependency-graph (were on disk
but missing from the docs README index).
- New reference/scaffolding.md: plop generators, gen:api (NSwag), gen:snippets,
and the skill recipes — the one consolidated "how generation works" page.
- Fix stale backlog range (WP-01…WP-28 -> WP-48) and de-link the dead WP-32 row
(undo folded into WP-31, no separate file).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5