BIO-012: roleInterceptor/subjectInterceptor are correctly registered
only under isDevMode(), but three hand-written fetch adapters
(reveal-bignummer, letter-preview, org-template's proefbrief) bypass
HttpClient and set X-Role/X-Subject themselves with no guard. The
readers underneath, role.ts and subject.ts, were ungated too: they
read ?role=/?subject= and wrote it into sessionStorage on any
navigation, in any build -- for ?subject= that value is a BSN, which
is exactly what SessionStore's G1 comment promises never happens.
Gate both layers: currentRole()/currentSubject() return their safe
default immediately outside isDevMode() (no query-param read, no
sessionStorage write), and the three adapters additionally wrap their
headers in isDevMode() so a production request carries neither header
at all, matching what an HttpClient request already does once the
interceptors aren't registered.
TE-002: reveal-bignummer's response-shape validation was a "Trust
boundary" a spec could only reach by stubbing globalThis.fetch.
Exported it as parseRevealed(body), matching the other 30 parse*
boundaries in the repo. Same treatment for letter-preview's
errorMessage and org-template's proefbrief error mapping (extracted
from an inline try/catch into a named, exported function first, since
it wasn't already separate).
BIO-006(a): reveal-bignummer sent X-Step-Up: 'true' unconditionally,
so the backend's step-up precondition constrained nothing. reveal()
now takes a stepUp flag; BriefStore.revealBigNummer() -- reachable
only after the UI's confirm() gesture -- is the one that supplies it,
so the literal no longer lives in the transport adapter.
BIO-006(b): documented in roles-and-access.md that drafter is also
the backend's fallback identity (StubIdentityProvider's catch-all
arm), not just the dev switcher's initial choice -- so the
least-privilege consequence of it also being the only role that may
reveal a BSN is visible.
Doc correction, same diff: roles-and-access.md's "wired only under
isDevMode()" claim was false for the three hand-written fetch paths;
it now says where the gate lives (interceptor registration and the
reader functions) so it doesn't go stale the same way again.
CLAUDE.md's dev-only claims needed no correction -- they already
noted these three calls bypass the interceptor.
Every fix has a test confirmed red by temporarily reverting the
source change and rerunning the suite before restoring it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four close-outs and their README rows. The behaviour spec is regenerated
once here rather than per-track — it derives from every test name in the
repo, so any track running it would have conflicted with the other three.
Records two findings the arc surfaced but did not cause: the /brief/preview
staleness for non-DemoOwner identities (blocking per-spec identity isolation
in brief-v2.spec.ts), and that WP-72/73 had to share a commit because both
edit Program.cs — separate execution waves prevented build collisions but
did not produce separable diffs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ADR-0001's own canonical "config value" example was unenforced: GET
/intake/policy echoed ScholingThreshold, but no request DTO carried a
scholing answer, so the server had nothing to re-validate. A crafted
POST could skip a requirement the wizard presents as mandatory.
IntakePolicy.RejectIncompleteScholing is the authority — three-valued
completeness (below threshold an answer is required; "nee" is legal and
still submits; punten only belong to a followed scholing), living in the
class that owns the constant so scripts/check-seam.sh keeps guarding the
FE/BE literal pair. Both submit paths call it; a violation 400s with
ProblemDetails and leaves the aanvraag a Concept. Gated on
Type == "intake" (the endpoint's switch lumps herregistratie with
intake, which has no scholing question), and guarded by `reject is null`
so a zero-uren submission is still decided on its merits.
Also fixes a live FE bug in the same rule: validateStep required punten
whenever scholingGevolgd was 'ja' regardless of lageUren, while the
template renders those fields only when lageUren — so answering 'ja'
then raising uren either blocked the user on an invisible field or
emitted aanvullendeScholing: undefined alongside punten. punten now
derives from aanvullendeScholing, so that combination is unrepresentable
in ValidIntake.
Note: EndpointTests' Worked_hours_submission_succeeds was itself
asserting the vulnerable payload ({ uren: 40 }, no answer) and needed a
complete answer added; the zero-hours rows are the ordering regression
net and are unmodified.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Gherkin/Cucumber was considered and rejected for business-readable BDD
scenarios: step-binding by runtime string match undoes the compile-time
guarantees WP-70 just added, and needs two frameworks for .NET+TS with
no non-technical co-author in view. Instead scripts/gen-behaviour-spec.mjs
(modeled on the existing gen-snippets.mjs) extracts every describe/it
and [Fact]/[Theory] name straight from the real suites into
libs/shared/docs/behaviour-spec.mdx, gated for drift in CI exactly like
gen-snippets/gen-api — the page can never diverge from the tests because
it's generated from them, and test names stay the single source of truth.
scripts/check-seam.sh guards the one FE/BE rule duplication most likely
to silently diverge: IntakePolicy.cs's ScholingThreshold vs
intake.machine.ts's SCHOLING_THRESHOLD_DEFAULT, two unlinked literals
pinned separately in each side's own tests but never against each other.
package.json/CI wiring for both (gen:behaviour-spec, check:seam) shipped
in the prior commit alongside the typecheck gate, since all three touch
the same few config files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ehoandClaude Opus 5