Commit Graph
18 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 dd11eafe50 refactor: strip WP-/RB- ticket refs from apps and libs (RD-18)
204 WP-NN/RB-NN comments named a closed ticket instead of the code they
sit next to. git blame already records history and stays correct when
code moves; the comment does not. This sweep removes the reference and
keeps the sentence, across 95 files in apps/ and libs/ plus the
behaviour-spec generator's header text.

Eleven references stay: five story files justify an a11y disable per
the README's rule, and one line in a11y.mdx documents that convention.
Two sentences needed a rewrite, not a deletion, so the reference's
meaning survives its removal. behaviour-spec.mdx is regenerated, not
hand-edited.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 21:23:07 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 e221834f6e refactor: add successOr, sweep remaining inline unwraps (RD-17)
Eight sites hand-rolled `rd.tag === 'Success' ? rd.value : fallback`. Six
take the new `successOr(rd, fallback)`, one takes the existing `successOf`,
and one (`big-profile.store.ts`) uses the existing `map`, since it returns a
RemoteData rather than an unwrapped value.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 20:33:56 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 0c6fd37ed8 fix: give Failed its own branch in the two single-step forms (RD-06)
Before this fix, a failed submit on the besluit-form or the
change-request-form left the user stuck. Both templates rendered `Failed`
through the same `@else` branch as the editable form. In besluit-form the
fields read from `Editing` only, so they went blank. In change-request-form
the fields still showed the sent value, but `SetField` only applies to
`Editing`, so typing did nothing. In both forms the submit button stayed
enabled, but `Submit` is a no-op outside `Editing`. The only escape was a
page reload.

After this fix, `Failed` gets its own template branch: an error message, a
read-only summary of what was sent (an `app-data-block`, reused from the
existing BRP-address pattern), and a "Opnieuw proberen" button that
dispatches `Retry`. Both machines already handle `Retry` (`Failed ->
Submitting` with the preserved data), so no machine change was needed.

Both components also move to `createStore`'s effect map (RD-05): the
`Submitting` handler replaces the hand-called `runIfSubmitting`, so
`onSubmit` is now a single `dispatch`. `runIfSubmitting`/`runIfIndienen`
now remain only in the three wizards, migrated later by RD-08.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 16:55:20 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 194cccfd02 refactor: rename Application → Aanvraag across the wire (Step 1/8)
The wire said Application, the domain said Aanvraag — one aggregate with
two names at every hop. Rename the backend DTOs and the /applications
route to /aanvragen, regenerate the typed client, and rename the frontend
adapter/store to match.

Renamed: ApplicationSummaryDto/DetailDto, CreateApplicationRequest,
SubmitApplicationRequest/Response → Aanvraag* equivalents;
ApplicationsAdapter/Store → AanvragenAdapter/Store;
applications.adapter.ts/applications.store.ts → aanvragen.*.

Left untouched: the admin Case/Zaak vocabulary (/admin/cases,
AdminCasesStore) — a separate read model, not part of this rename; the
internal BigRegister.Domain.Applications namespace and the Applications
EF table (renaming those needs a new EF migration, out of scope here).

Part of the dashboard-readability refactor (see the approved plan).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 14:33:16 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 dfc6c419f4 refactor(specs): replay real messages in 4 machine specs (RB-31)
Four machine specs built their starting state with a hand-rolled object
literal instead of replaying real Msgs through the real reduce, the
exact anti-pattern ADR-0006 section 2 forbids. Three of the four also
hardcoded errors: {}, a shape the reducer might never actually produce.

intake.machine.spec.ts now imports the existing givenIntake from
intake.testing.ts (previously used only by intake.acceptance.spec.ts).
Three new one-line *.testing.ts files export the same given(reduce,
initial) wrapper for registratie-wizard, besluit, and brief. Every old
literal helper (answering, invullen, editingWith, loaded) is replaced
by a message replay that reaches the same state.

Two tests in registratie-wizard.machine.spec.ts asserted a cursor value
the real reducer cannot reach (cursor 2 with no diploma chosen yet,
which requires a diploma to already be set). Both are re-pointed at the
reachable cursor-1 equivalent; submit() validates the whole draft
regardless of cursor, so no assertion changed. Recorded in
implementation/rb-31.md, not worked around.

No *.machine.ts reducer was touched. All four specs pass; npm run ci
is green (lint, typecheck, dep:check, format, tokens, seam, all four
test suites, both app builds, backend 293/293, api-client drift).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 13:26:12 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 f19185ed81 refactor(auth): land Session -> Principal, add MedewerkerAdapter (RB-13)
ADR-0002 SS3 models Zorgverlener/Medewerker as different Principal
variants with different login flows. Actor #2 (apps/behandelportal)
landed in WP-61/67 and the union never followed: grep -rn "Principal"
returned one hit, a comment. Both apps' auth/domain/session.ts stayed
byte-identical (`{ bsn, naam }`), so the backoffice's Behandelaar
carried a BSN and logged into the backoffice as a citizen, by DigiD,
under a fabricated citizen's name (login.page.ts). The divergence
ADR-0002 predicted took an orthogonal side door instead
(medewerker.interceptor.ts's X-Medewerker/X-Rollen stamp, which never
touches SessionStore) -- which is why ssp/auth and bhp/auth still
measured as 100%/84% duplicated after ADR-C-006 shared the route
guards. RB-09 (landed the day before) made the backend's
IIdentityProvider able to say "no identity" and fail closed; this
ticket is its named FE half.

Each app's auth/domain/session.ts becomes principal.ts, holding the
one Principal variant that app actually has an actor for: ssp keeps
`{ kind: 'zorgverlener', bsn, naam }` (G1 still strips the BSN before
persisting); behandelportal gets `{ kind: 'medewerker', medewerkerId,
naam, rollen }` (no BSN to strip -- G2 shape validation only). A new
MedewerkerAdapter replaces DigidAdapter in behandelportal, resolving
the existing MEDEWERKER_ID/currentRollen() dev stand-in into a
Principal; because there is no credential to check, it returns
Principal directly rather than a Result whose error variant could
never occur. login.page.ts stops being a BSN/wachtwoord form -- one
explainer line and an "Inloggen met SSO" button -- and its dead
error-handling branch goes with the Result wrapper that justified it.

Measured with tools/baseline-scan.mjs --dup: auth duplication drops
from 168/168 (ssp) and 168/200 (bhp) to 32/179 and 32/259 -- under the
backlog's <40 target. What remains is the ADR-C-006 route-guard
re-export (deliberately identical), generic test/story-file
boilerplate, and one shared fragment of the root-singleton-store
idiom -- not re-converged identity or login-flow logic. SS3's
prediction that the two actors would authenticate differently enough
to justify not sharing auth has now actually been tested, not just
asserted, and held.

Also: renamed Session.bsn to Principal.bsn in two doc comments
(libs/shared/src/infrastructure/subject.ts, subject.interceptor.ts)
that cited the old type name; regenerated
libs/shared/docs/behaviour-spec.mdx (generated file, per its own
banner); recorded the resolution in ADR-0002 as a new amendment,
replacing its "Known debt" section.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 16:54:26 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 de349e702e test(auth): extract and spec the stored-session parse boundary (RB-10)
SessionStore.restore() — identical in both apps — read localStorage itself
and did the parse plus shape validation in the same module-private function,
invoked from a field initializer, so the storage read happened the instant
the singleton was constructed and no spec could feed it a raw string. The
logic it guards is a trust boundary, not incidental validation: the comment
above it names G1 (never persist the BSN) and G2 (validate the shape before
trusting it), and CLAUDE.md mandates a spec for boundary parse* adapters.
ssp/auth and bhp/auth were jointly the worst-covered frontend modules.

parseStoredSession(raw) moves into each app's auth/domain/session.ts, which
is pure TS and already had a spec, so no new scaffolding was needed;
restore() collapses to one line. Four cases: absent, non-JSON, wrong shape,
and — BIO-017's addition — a stored {"bsn":…,"naam":…} restoring with bsn
'', which makes the G1 guarantee executable rather than merely commented.
Verified red without the fix.

Landed twice, once per app, deliberately. TE-001 and BL-002 both say an
extract-to-shared here would contradict ADR-0002, which models the two
actors as different Principal variants and expects the two auth contexts to
diverge; RB-13 is what differentiates them.

Also specs redactProfile (BIO-017's second half) — a pure exported
PII-redaction function that had none.

behaviour-spec.mdx is regenerated, which also picks up the test names RB-07
added; that commit should have carried them and did not.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 14:08:06 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 4b94f8edb5 fix(flags): surface a failed admin toggle instead of swallowing it
FeatureFlagStore.set() was try/finally with no catch. A rejected
PUT /admin/flags/{key} escaped into the `void this.store.set(...)` call site
as an unhandled promise rejection; the finally-block reload then snapped the
control back to its old value. The admin saw a toggle that silently refused
to move, with no error rendered anywhere and nothing in the state.

set() now folds through the existing runSubmit helper and returns
Result<string, void>, reloading either way so the state still reflects the
server. The page awaits it and renders the failure in an app-alert.

Found by the CQRS-light pass (CQ-002/CQ-004) as one of three mutations that
reach the raw ApiClient without producing a Result — the baseline's BL-007
inventory had missed all three.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 18:13:29 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 f2d4c900b4 refactor(auth): share the actor-agnostic route guards (ADR-C-006)
authGuard and capabilityGuard were duplicated byte-for-byte across both
apps, along with their specs — 57 of the 211 duplicated lines BL-002
measured in the two auth contexts, the largest block after session.store.ts.

They are not actor-specific. They ask "is anyone logged in" and "may they do
X", never "who are you or how did you get here". ADR-0002 §3's non-sharing
decision scopes to identity and login flow — Principal, DigiD vs employee
SSO — and a route guard is neither; §Consequences names auth.guard.ts only
as a seam that localises the change, not as something that must be
duplicated.

Moves both to libs/shared/src/application/auth.guard.ts, reading SESSION_PORT
instead of an app-local SessionStore. The port gains one member,
isAuthenticated: Signal<boolean> — free, because both SessionStores already
expose exactly that (session.store.ts:40) and both apps already register
{ provide: SESSION_PORT, useExisting: SessionStore }. The seam existed; it
was just narrower than what it already carried.

Each app keeps a re-export at @auth/auth.guard so app.routes.ts is untouched
— routing asks the auth context for its guards, which is the direction the
boundary should read. The two identical specs collapse into one, plus a case
asserting the guard resolves through the port.

Deliberately NOT merged: session.store.ts, session.ts, digid.adapter.ts,
login-form.component.ts, login.page.ts. Those are identical only because
ADR-C-004 (Session -> Principal) was never executed. Merging them would make
a citizen DigiD/BSN login the backoffice's shared login.

Measured with tools/baseline-scan.mjs: ssp/auth duplicated lines 211 -> 151,
bhp/auth 86.8% -> 82.5%, repo-wide 7.1% -> 6.6%. Both guard clone pairs drop
out of the top-clones list. What remains is exactly the three files
ADR-C-004 should differentiate.

behaviour-spec.mdx regenerated (the spec moved libraries).

Verified: lint, typecheck, dep:check (0 violations, 224 modules), prettier,
ng build --localize for both apps, and 407 tests passing across all four
projects.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 17:49:04 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 42f7bd651d test(e2e): isolate runs and identities without a new backend endpoint (WP-74)
The three specs shared one mutable backend and said so in their own
comments ("Restart the backend between CI runs"). WP-70 recorded the fix as
a dev-only seed endpoint; it isn't needed. The DB path already routes
through IConfiguration, so playwright.config's webServer hands the backend a
throwaway SQLite file per invocation — the same trick TestWebApplicationFactory
already uses, with zero backend change. And StubIdentityProvider already
honoured X-Subject; the only gap was that nothing sent it. That matters
because the backend has no IsDevelopment() gate anywhere, so a seed endpoint
would have had to invent the codebase's first environment gate.

subjectInterceptor mirrors the existing roleInterceptor and is wired into the
same isDevMode()-only list. Interceptors alone were not enough: the raw XHR
upload and the hand-written letter-preview fetch bypass Angular's chain (as
CLAUDE.md documents), so both now stamp X-Subject explicitly — without that,
every uploaded document still landed under DemoOwner.

reuseExistingServer stays on: flipping it would break local runs for anyone
already serving the docker stack. Each run gets a unique DB filename and
global-setup sweeps only prior runs' leftovers — deleting a fixed path
mid-run risks SQLite silently recreating an empty, unmigrated file under
fullyParallel.

Verified: e2e passes twice back-to-back with no backend restart, and
X-Subject was observed on a real request, not merely wired.

brief-v2.spec.ts keeps the shared identity for now — see the KNOWN GAP note;
a backend staleness bug makes /brief/preview return a sent letter with the
draft watermark for any non-DemoOwner BSN. actors.ts reserves the actor for
whoever fixes it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 16:32:07 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 3652ff8d3f docs(test): make Given/When/Then the default BDD structure (WP-71)
bdd.mdx previously banned "Given/When/Then ceremony" outright, which
directly contradicted WP-70's own acceptance tests (Acceptance/
BesluitLifecycleTests.cs already used // Given/When/Then comments) and
the backend's organically-evolved PascalCase_snake_sentence convention,
which the doc gave zero guidance for. Reverses that rule: every test is
now structured Given -> When -> Then, with a genuinely empty phase
omitted rather than faked; present-tense declarative naming and the
one-behaviour-per-test rule are unchanged. ADR-0006 gets a cross-reference
so both documents agree everywhere, not just in acceptance tests.

Also closes out the doc's other named-but-unenforced rules found by the
audit: fixes the 5 files asserting rendered $localize copy instead of
the underlying tag/message-id (the compliant pattern already existed in
werkvoorraad-item-view.spec.ts), splits the multi-behaviour titles the
doc itself calls a smell (";", "and", "/"), and fixes bdd.mdx's own false
citation of registratie-wizard.machine.spec.ts as "one transition per
test" by actually splitting that test into one-transition-per-test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 20:25:30 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 28c0a250e7 test(backend): split RuleTests.cs by aggregate, refresh DDD doc (WP-71)
RuleTests.cs held five aggregates' rules as nested classes in one file,
misaligned with Domain/<Aggregate>/ and with the Acceptance/Builders/
folder convention WP-70 started. Split into Domain/<Aggregate>RuleTests.cs
(pure move — same names, same bodies, same count) plus a new
ApplicationRuleTests.cs (the enum invariant moved out of the
WebApplicationFactory-booting ApplicationTests.cs, since it's a pure
Enum.GetNames check with no business needing a web host) and
OrgTemplateRuleTests.cs (RejectDraft had no direct unit test before,
only endpoint coverage).

libs/shared/docs/layers.mdx still taught the pre-WP-67 shape (six
contexts, no apps/libs split, enforcement via ESLint) — updated to the
real monorepo structure and to dependency-cruiser as the actual
enforcement mechanism. Adds specs for registration.policy.ts's
isStatusConsistent (untested; its backend mirror is) and both apps'
auth/domain/session.ts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 20:25:05 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 b937e55ad3 test: close illegal-state escape hatches in spec type-safety (WP-71)
ESLint blanket-exempted every *.spec.ts from the any ban, and no gate
type-checked spec files at all (ng test is transpile-only), so a wrong
cast in a test could never fail the build. 76 `as any` + 12 `as
Extract<>` state-narrowing casts in the three biggest wizard specs read
one variant's fields off a whole-union value: if the reducer returned
the wrong variant, the assertion silently read undefined instead of
failing.

expectTag(state, tag) (libs/shared/src/testing/expect-tag.ts) asserts
and narrows in one call, replacing every one of those casts. Removes
the spec-file any exemption, adds `npm run typecheck` (tsc --noEmit
over each project's tsconfig.spec.json) to CI, and forbids production
code from importing libs/shared/src/testing via dependency-cruiser.
Backend: AanvraagBuilder now models ZaakUrl (closing the last
post-Build() mutation) and guards AtStep; null-forgiving `!` on
endpoint assertions replaced with Assert.NotNull so a null DTO fails by
name, not NullReferenceException.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 20:24:53 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 a73a1c6f1e test(frontend): replay real messages instead of hand-built state literals (WP-70)
Every machine spec redefined its own throwaway fixture helper (editing1/2/3,
editingWith), hardcoding fields like errors: {} that assert against shapes
the reducer may never actually produce. given(reduce, initial)(...msgs)
(libs/shared/src/testing/machine.ts) replaces them by replaying real Msgs
through the real reduce, so a fixture is provably reachable. Adds the same
idiom for value objects (unwrapOk) and RemoteData (loading/success/failure),
plus intake.acceptance.spec.ts as a worked full-journey example.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 15:31:06 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 af8a011819 feat(behandelportal): WP-65b beoordeling besluit (decision write)
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 56s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 2m36s
CI / storybook-a11y (pull_request) Failing after 3m19s
CI / backend (pull_request) Failing after 1m55s
CI / api-client-drift (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Canceled after 40s
CI / semgrep (pull_request) Canceled after 24s
Adds POST /beoordeling/{id}/besluit: a Besluit enum (Goedkeuren/Afwijzen/
MeerInfoOpvragen) backed by new Aanvraag.BesluitStatus/BesluitToelichting
columns, gated by the same BeoordelingRules.CanDecide the read side's
canBesluiten flag already uses (409 on an illegal transition, 400 on a
missing required toelichting). Mappers.ToStatusDto gains the "a recorded
decision wins" branch. FE: besluit.machine.ts + besluit-form organism
(same form idiom as change-request-form), wired into the beoordeling page
behind the server's canBesluiten flag.

Completes WP-65 (65a + 65b) — verified end-to-end against a running
backend (werkvoorraad -> beoordeling -> besluit -> status reflected back).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 09:46:20 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 4133b30e5d feat(behandelportal): WP-65a beoordeling detail (read) + fix unreachable medewerker login
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 54s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 2m38s
CI / storybook-a11y (pull_request) Failing after 3m28s
CI / backend (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
CI / semgrep (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 2m55s
CI / api-client-drift (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
New GET /beoordeling/{id} shows one aanvraag's status, linked documents, and a
canBesluiten decision flag, gated by the same CanBeoordelen capability as the
werkvoorraad list. Reads through IZaakSource.ListCases rather than a new seam
method (WP-66 needs one anyway for the real write); owner BSN is masked.

Fixes a real gap found while wiring this up: the behandelportal's login was still
WP-61's copied citizen/BSN DigiD flow, so nothing ever sent X-Medewerker and the
werkvoorraad screen (WP-64) always denied in a real browser. A dev-only
medewerkerInterceptor (mirrors the existing ?role= stand-in as ?rollen=) fixes that.

WP-65's own Risks note authorized splitting read from write across sessions given
its size; this is the read half. The decision-recording mutation is next (65b).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 09:01:09 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 fe69caee63 feat(behandelportal): WP-64 werkvoorraad (queue) screen
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 57s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 2m36s
CI / storybook-a11y (pull_request) Failing after 3m14s
CI / backend (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
CI / semgrep (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 3m3s
CI / api-client-drift (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
New GET /werkvoorraad endpoint lists aanvragen still open (Ingediend/InBehandeling),
gated by the medewerker capability (CanBeoordelen) rather than the admin role — reuses
the existing ApplicationSummaryDto, no new DTO. GET /me now surfaces aanvraag:beoordelen
for a behandelaar so the FE can gate with the same AccessStore/capabilityGuard idiom
every other page uses.

FE: a behandeling domain type deliberately narrower than ssp's full AanvraagStatus
union (only the two open tags — illegal states unrepresentable), composed into a
werkvoorraad-list organism from existing shared/ui molecules. Replaces WP-61's
scaffold placeholder as the app's real landing page.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 22:02:35 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 e7156c5132 feat(WP-67): merge behandelportal into this repo as a monorepo
Restructures into apps/ssp + apps/behandelportal (two Angular projects)
plus libs/shared + libs/beheer (cross-app libraries), replacing WP-61's
separate sibling repo. That split had already produced real drift: a
hand-vendored copy of the backend's OpenAPI doc, a shared/ui+layout tree
forked and silently diverging (7 files), and beheer + the styles.scss
token bridge duplicated byte-for-byte across both repos.

- git mv the SSP's src/app/* into apps/ssp/; fold shared/, beheer/,
  environments/, the Storybook docs/*.mdx, and styles.scss into
  libs/shared + libs/beheer (all confirmed identical between the two
  repos before merging). auth stays deliberately duplicated per
  ADR-0002 (actor-specific, expected to diverge) - amended there.
- One generated API client (libs/shared), no more vendored swagger.json.
- .dependency-cruiser split into a base factory + one config per app,
  and Storybook into .storybook-ssp/.storybook-behandelportal - both
  forced by the @auth/* alias resolving to different directories per app.
- SiteHeaderComponent/ShellComponent gained HEADER_NAV_ITEMS/
  HEADER_ADMIN_LINKS/DEBUG_PANEL injection tokens so each app supplies
  its own nav/admin-links/dev-panel instead of one being hardcoded.
- CLAUDE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, dependencies.md, and ADR-0002 updated;
  WP-67 backlog entry documents the full decision trail.

npm run ci green (lint, dep:check x2, 360 tests across ssp/
behandelportal/shared/beheer, both localized builds, backend tests,
snippet + api-client drift); both dev servers, both Storybook
instances, and docker compose verified working.

The old sibling repo (/home/eho/repos/behandelportal) is left
untouched, not deleted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 21:01:57 +02:00