ehoandClaude Opus 5
664a43bf2d
Runs the multi-agent refactoring-backlog pipeline in docs/project/ refactor-backlog-setup/ up to and including three of the seven Phase 1 agents. 00-baseline.md establishes the metrics every later agent must cite, using only tooling already in the repo (vitest lcov, coverlet cobertura, ESLint's core `complexity` rule at threshold 0 for a full distribution, depcruise --metrics). Duplication and C# complexity had no tooling, so tools/baseline-scan.mjs adds a deterministic ~200-line text scan rather than a new dependency; the approximations are labelled as such. Headline: FE 75.1% line coverage but only over the 98 of 220 source files a spec loads; BE 97.6% line / 79.6% branch; 0 layering violations; 7.1% duplication; 25 of 2085 TS functions over CC 10. Then 02-testability, 04-cqrs-light and 06-adr-conformance (27 findings). 01/03/05 were skipped deliberately — the baseline shows little for them to find; 07 (BIO2) and 08 (consolidation) are still open. Each agent corrected a baseline observation of mine, and in every case the error was in something derived rather than measured: - BL-007 counted ~13 adapter "mutations" from the `runSubmit` helper name; 5 of those call sites are reads. It also missed 3 real mutations that reach the raw ApiClient and never return a Result. - BL-002 diagnosed the 100%-duplicated auth folders as ADR-0002's divergence prediction failing. It never had a chance to fail: §3's `Principal` union was never built. - BL-004 named libs/shared/domain and libs/beheer/contracts as coverage gaps; both are pure type declarations where 0% is unimprovable. All three corrections are recorded inline in 00-baseline.md §10, so agent 08 does not inherit the bad numbers. .prettierignore excludes the agent prompt directories — reflowing their markdown would edit the prompt text itself. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
545 B
545 B
MODEL: Opus OUTPUT FILE: /refactor-backlog/04-cqrs-light.md DEPENDS ON: 00-baseline.md (complete)
[Insert contents of _persistence-protocol.md here]
AGENT: CQRS-light Agent
Target: command/query separation at the application-service level (not event sourcing or separate read models unless already present per baseline.md). Only extend existing CQRS-light patterns — do not introduce the pattern into modules where it's absent. Identify handlers/services mixing reads and writes within modules that already show the pattern elsewhere.