Two backlog trees are complete: `docs/project/backlog/` (75 files, every WP done) and `docs/project/refactor-backlog-setup/` (the arc before it). Move both under `docs/project/archive/` with `git mv`, so history stays intact through `git log --follow`. `SHOWCASE-ROADMAP.md` moves with them, because it points at the now-archived backlog README. Add `docs/project/archive/README.md`. It states that these trees are historical and names the two directories that are still live. Repoint every inbound reference named in RD-30's Files table: CLAUDE.md, the root README, both backend READMEs, `LetterHtml.cs`, `a11y.mdx`, the `document-feature` and `new-ssp` skills, and the readable-codebase PLAN, README, and RD-19 ticket. Fix two upward-relative links inside the moved WP files (WP-68, WP-69) that gained a directory level and would otherwise break. Repoint `.prettierignore`'s two agent-prompt exclusions to their new path, so prettier keeps leaving those files' exact wording alone. Mark RD-30 done and check off its acceptance criteria; flip its README row to done. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.7 KiB
RB-33 — unwrapOk: adopt or delete
Status: implemented · 2026-08-28 · Source finding: 06-adr-conformance.md ADR-C-011 ·
99-backlog.md RB-33
Decision: delete
The ticket names this "adopt or delete", not "adopt", and asks for the judgment call, not
the default. I deleted unwrapOk.
Why delete, not adopt
unwrapOk (libs/shared/src/testing/value-object.ts) has had zero consumers across the
whole codebase since ADR-0006 shipped it, except its own definition and one sentence in
libs/shared/docs/testing.mdx. I verified this before changing anything:
grep -rn "unwrapOk" apps libs --include=*.ts --include=*.mdx
libs/shared/docs/testing.mdx:92: ...unwrapOk(parseX(raw))...
libs/shared/src/testing/value-object.ts:9:export function unwrapOk<E, T>(...)
libs/shared/src/testing/value-object.ts:11: throw new Error(`unwrapOk: ...`);
The one call site the finding names,
apps/ssp/src/app/registratie/application/submit-change-request.spec.ts, still has the
exact hand-rolled guard the finding quotes:
const telefoon = parseTelefoonnummer('0612345678');
if (!telefoon.ok) throw new Error('fixture phone should parse');
I also checked whether any other spec has the same shape, in case the finding's "one call site" undercounted the real duplication:
grep -rln "if (!.*\.ok)\s*throw" apps libs --include=*.spec.ts
apps/ssp/src/app/registratie/application/submit-change-request.spec.ts
Only this one file, anywhere. There is no cast ('x' as Telefoonnummer) to close off
either — the spec already calls the real parseTelefoonnummer and checks .ok before
touching .value. ADR-0006 §3's actual requirement ("never a cast") is already met by the
inline code, with or without the helper.
Weighing it honestly:
- For adopt: it is a one-line change, and the ADR's own worked example literally shows this exact call. Doing it would make the finding's "zero adopters" claim technically false.
- For delete: a helper that gains its only real-codebase consumer by an agent adding
that one call site as an act of ticket compliance is not organic adoption — it is
manufacturing a usage to justify keeping the file.
unwrapOkhas sat available, exported, and documented since ADR-0006 (well before this session) without a single spec reaching for it on its own. One caller, forever, is not "removing duplication" (the stated point of a shared test helper) — there is no duplication with only one occurrence. The inline guard is also arguably clearer here: its error message ('fixture phone should parse') names the actual fixture, whereunwrapOk's generic message (unwrapOk: expected ok, got error: ...) does not.
Delete wins: it removes dead, unadopted code and its stale doc reference, changes no runtime behaviour anywhere, and costs nothing to reverse if a second real need for this idiom shows up later (three lines, trivial to re-add against actual duplication instead of a single hypothetical site).
What changed
| File | Change |
|---|---|
libs/shared/src/testing/value-object.ts |
Deleted. Its only export, unwrapOk, is what this ticket removes; the file had nothing else in it. |
libs/shared/docs/testing.mdx |
Rewrote the sentence that named unwrapOk and the deleted file's path. It now states the same rule in plain terms — call the real parse* and check .ok, never a cast — and keeps the RemoteData half of the sentence pointing at remote-data.ts (unchanged, still in use). |
apps/ssp/src/app/registratie/application/submit-change-request.spec.ts |
Not touched. Its inline guard already satisfies ADR-0006 §3; this is the "delete" branch, so the fixture-construction behaviour stays exactly as it was. |
99-backlog.md |
RB-33's status cell: open → implemented. |
What this ticket did not touch
docs/reference/architecture/0006-test-data-builders.md (the ADR itself) still shows
unwrapOk in its worked example and decision table. That is deliberate: RB-33 is a code
ticket, not one of the five ADR-fix tickets that need architect sign-off
(06-adr-conformance.md's "ADR-fix tickets" section). The ADR's illustrated pattern
("call the real parser, unwrap through a checked path, never a cast") is still the correct
principle — this ticket only removes one now-unused concrete implementation of it, which
the inline guard in submit-change-request.spec.ts already satisfies without the named
helper. Amending the ADR's own text is out of this ticket's scope and is left for a future
ADR-fix ticket if one is ever raised. The finding document (06-adr-conformance.md) and the
historical WP-70/WP-71 backlog notes that mention unwrapOk are left as-is — they are
records of what was true when written, not living code.
No other file in libs/shared/src/testing/ was touched (expect-tag.ts, machine.ts,
remote-data.ts are all unrelated and still have real consumers).
Verification
grep -rn "unwrapOk" apps libs --include=*.ts --include=*.mdx— zero occurrences.apps/ssp/src/app/registratie/application/submit-change-request.spec.ts— unchanged file, still passes (seenpm run ciresult below).- No new test added. The ticket is a deletion of unused code plus a doc-sentence rewrite;
the surviving inline guard in the spec is exercised the same way it always was, by the
spec's three existing
itblocks. npm run ci(foreground): see the session report for the exit code and step count.