2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
1c185e6686 S-09b: Approval flow — temp admin endpoint + status transition to projection (#77)
Some checks are pending
CI / verify-stack (push) Waiting to run
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m25s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m13s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m26s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m35s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m6s
## What & why

S-09b (#75, split from #10) — the **approval flow** that completes the walking skeleton. A behandelaar can now approve a submitted registration; the entry flips from `INGEDIEND` to `INGESCHREVEN` in the public register. Flow: `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW `/statussen`) → OpenZaak → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar.

## Changes (bottom-up, each red→green TDD)

- **Domain** — `RegistrationStatus.Ingeschreven` + `Registration.Approve()` (guards: opened zaak, only from INGEDIEND); `ApproveRegistration` use case (idempotent) + temp `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` endpoint; `IAclClient.ApproveZaakAsync`.
- **ACL** — resolves the zaaktype's **eindstatus** from the catalogus (`isEindstatus` / highest volgnummer) and POSTs a ZGW status; exposed as `POST /statussen`. Unit + real-OpenZaak integration test.
- **Event-subscriber** — binds NRC `hoofdObject`, projects a `status`/`create` as `INGESCHREVEN` keyed on the zaak (updates the existing row), **without reading OpenZaak** (§8.1). Retains the ZGW `resource` in the log (new column + EF migration) so a rebuild reproduces the status.
- **e2e** — extended: submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN.
- **Docs** — ADR-0011 (the two non-obvious decisions + the walking-skeleton assumption) + demo note.

## Key decisions (see ADR-0011)

- **ACL discovers the eindstatus** (chosen over injecting a statustype URL): no new config/seed plumbing, domain stays ZGW-ignorant.
- **Any post-creation status-set ⇒ INGESCHREVEN**: in the walking skeleton the only status ever set after creation is the approval, and the subscriber may not read ZGW — documented to tighten when more transitions arrive (S-12+).

## Verification

- All .NET unit suites green locally (domain 47, acl 11, event-subscriber 14, bff 16, acceptance 7); Release build + `dotnet format` clean.
- No new compose config (the eindstatus-discovery approach avoided it).
- The real-OpenZaak integration test (ACL status-set) and the full submit→approve→visible e2e run in CI `verify-stack` (live NRC→projection + selectielijst egress, not reproducible locally).

closes #75

Reviewed-on: #77
2026-07-14 09:04:57 +00:00
7ef63c7ae9 feat(projection): persist the read projection and expose webhook + read APIs (refs #7)
Add the projection persistence and the two services around it:

- Projection.ReadModel: a shared EF Core (Npgsql) read model owning the projection
  schema — register_projection + the subscriber's processed_notifications log — plus
  EfProjectionStore / EfNotificationLog (atomic record-or-skip on the PK for idempotency)
  and the initial migration. One rebuildable store, written by the subscriber and read
  by projection-api (ADR-0008).
- EventSubscriber.Api: POST /notifications NRC callback (enforces the abonnement bearer,
  401 without it per ADR-0007), POST /admin/rebuild, /health. Migrates on start.
- ProjectionApi.Api: GET /register, GET /register/{id}, /health — the read side.

dotnet-ef pinned as a local tool for migrations; NuGetAuditMode=direct so EF's
design-time-only tooling transitive doesn't flag the shipped build.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 14:55:04 +02:00