3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
not d6b3f9764f fix(e2e): bound the Playwright run and make a failed login say why (closes #161) (#165)
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m9s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m27s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m32s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 3m19s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m24s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 9m33s
## What & why

#161 is really two defects, and the second one is why the first was undiagnosable.

**A wedged suite consumed the job, and took the post-mortem with it.** Nothing bounded the
Playwright run, so CI stopped the job mid-suite — and `if: always()` does not survive that. Run
739's job metadata shows every step after the e2e as a **0-second failure** stamped at the kill:

```
14 failure  09:48:17 -> 10:14:54  Self-service e2e (Playwright …)
15 failure  10:14:54 -> 10:14:54  verify-stack check summary       ← if: always()
16 failure  10:14:54 -> 10:14:54  e2e spec summary                 ← if: always()
17 failure  10:14:54 -> 10:14:54  Dump container logs on failure   ← if: failure()
18 failure  10:14:54 -> 10:14:54  Tear down                        ← if: always()
```

So the per-spec summary, the container-log dump and the teardown never ran, and the log lost
whatever the killed process had buffered — leaving the single `✘` line the issue was filed from.
`globalTimeout` now makes Playwright stop and *report*: the JSON report is written and those steps
still get their turn. (A `timeout-minutes` on the job would have reproduced the same failure, so
there isn't one.) The "~24-minute gap" is that kill, not necessarily a hang — note run 739 shows
`run_attempt: 2`, and `concurrency.cancel-in-progress` kills an in-flight run on any re-run or push.

**A login that never got its form ate the 90-second test timeout.** Playwright actions auto-wait
until the *test* timeout, not `expect.timeout` — so a portal that serves its page but never
bootstraps (its `config.json` fetch or the OIDC discovery behind `authorize()` failed; `main.ts`
only `console.error`s) spent 90s to report `locator.fill: Test timeout of 90000ms exceeded`: the
symptom, not the cause. That is catalogus.spec's 1.8 minutes. Both Keycloak forms are now asserted
visible first, with a 20s budget and a message naming the step that never happened.

Verified against a real blank-bootstrap portal — the beheer image served with a `config.json` that
is not JSON — which fails in **20.2s** with *"the Keycloak login form never appeared — the portal
did not reach Keycloak (check its config.json fetch and the OIDC discovery …)"*.

**And the summary now says why.** The per-spec table (#136) rendered a verdict icon and nothing
else, so even a surviving summary cost a log dive. Failing specs now carry their first error,
flattened for a table cell (ANSI stripped, newlines collapsed, `|` escaped, clipped) — shape
verified against a real @playwright/test 1.61 failing report, with a stdlib assert self-check on
`make unit`.

Closes #161

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation.
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass; refactor commit follows (login helper dedup).
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #161`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (untouched).
- [x] Docs updated — `docs/runbooks/gitea-actions-gotchas.md` §9.
- [x] ADR — not needed: no boundary, dependency or coupling rule touched (test/CI infra only).
- [x] Demo note — not applicable: nothing user-visible.

## Notes for reviewers

**What this does not do: identify why the beheerder login failed that once.** The evidence to do
that was destroyed by defect 2, which is what this PR fixes. The suite ran green here five times
today (catalogus.spec 1.1–5.3s each) — but a local box is not the loaded CI runner, so that is weak
evidence and I am not claiming the flake is gone. What changes is that the next occurrence is
bounded and self-describing: it fails in 20s naming the failing step, the JSON report survives, and
the summary prints the error. Please keep #161 in mind rather than treating this as proof.

**Two follow-ups I did not pull into this PR:**
- *All four portals show a permanently blank page if their startup fetch fails* — `main.ts` does
  `fetch('config.json').then(bootstrap).catch(console.error)`, one shot, no UI and no recovery. That
  is a real product gap (the deliberately-broken portal above is exactly what a user would see) and
  wants its own slice, not a test-infra PR.
- `retries: 1` is untouched. CLAUDE.md §15 says flaky tests are fixed rather than retried, but
  removing retries while a real flake is unexplained would trade a rare red for a frequent one.
  Worth revisiting once #161 recurs (or doesn't) with the new diagnostics.

The login-helper rename (`medewerker-login.ts` → `keycloak-login.ts`, citizen logins routed through
`loginBurger`) is its own no-behaviour-change commit: the three citizen specs each duplicated the
same three-line login, so guarding the login path once meant routing them through it first.Reviewed-on: #165
2026-09-04 10:53:35 +00:00
not d0fb2b3e8c S-15c · Enforce MFA on the medewerker (Keycloak) realm (#158)
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m7s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m22s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m24s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 3m5s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m13s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 8m39s
Closes #132.

Staff logins (behandel + beheer portals) now need a second factor; the citizen realms are unchanged.

**How:** every seeded medewerker carries a TOTP credential, which activates Keycloak's stock *conditional OTP* step in both the browser flow and the direct grant — no custom browser-flow JSON in the export. `CONFIGURE_TOTP` is a default required action so a medewerker added later must enrol first. ADR-0031 records the choice and, explicitly, that the shared fixture secret is a demo posture only.

**Tests (red first, 30c5279):**
- `check_realms.py` asserts the medewerker password-only grant is **refused**, then that password + TOTP succeeds and still carries the `behandelaar` role. It failed with `[MFA NOT ENFORCED]` against the old export.
- The three medewerker e2e logins move to `loginMedewerker()` (`tests/e2e/medewerker-login.ts`), which submits Keycloak's OTP prompt. Both TOTP implementations (Python `hmac`, Node `crypto`) are ~6 lines of RFC 6238 — no new dependency.

Verified locally against Keycloak 26.1: password-only → `invalid_grant`, password + code → 200, and the browser flow's `#otp` prompt accepts a computed code and issues an auth code.

## Definition of Done
- [x] Failing test/verify committed first; implementation makes it pass.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #132`).
- [ ] CI green (verify-stack compose smoke + relevant checks).
- [x] `docker compose up` reaches green health within 3 minutes (Keycloak change is import-time only).
- [x] Docs touched (runbook, synthetic-data, demo-script) + ADR-0031 + demo note.
- [x] Closed by the merging PR (`closes #132`).

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)Reviewed-on: #158
2026-09-04 08:27:52 +00:00
not 4698c869f3 feat(portal-beheer): beheer portal + read-only catalogus viewer (closes #130) (#133)
CI / build (push) Successful in 4m31s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4m48s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m50s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 4m44s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 7m12s
CI / verify-stack (push) Canceled after 0s
## What & why

S-15a, the first of the S-15 (#16) split. A new **beheer** portal (medewerker realm, like behandel) shows the ZTC catalogus — the published zaaktypen — **read-only**. A beheerder logs in and sees the seeded BIG-REGISTRATIE zaaktype.

Closes #130

### The vertical

portal → BFF `GET /beheer/catalogi/zaaktypen` (medewerker realm + `beheerder` role) → ACL `GET /catalogi/zaaktypen` → ZGW Catalogi API.

- **ACL**: new read-only `GET /catalogi/zaaktypen` listing published zaaktypen (reuses the ADR-0021 Catalogi client; public-safe `identificatie`/`omschrijving`).
- **BFF**: new typed `IAclClient` + `Downstream:Acl:BaseUrl`, and `GET /beheer/catalogi/zaaktypen` behind a new `beheerder` policy (reuses the medewerker bearer scheme + realm-role lifting). OpenAPI spec + generated Angular client regenerated.
- **Keycloak**: `beheerder` realm role + `bram-beheerder` test user in the medewerker realm.
- **Frontend**: new `apps/beheer` Angular app (copied from behandel) with a read-only catalogus page; `SECURE_API_ROUTES=['/beheer/']`.
- **Infra**: `beheer` compose service (port 8143), added to `WAIT_SVCS` + CI log-dump; a Playwright e2e (beheerder login → catalogus shows BIG-REGISTRATIE).

### New boundary → ADR-0025

The BFF now reaches the **ACL directly** for the catalogus read — a new service-to-service edge (§14). The catalogus is neither a domain nor a projection concern, and §8.1 means only the ACL may read ZGW; routing through the domain would pollute it with a non-domain passthrough. §8.1/§8.3 stay intact. Recorded in **ADR-0025**.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Failing test committed before each implementation (red→green per layer: ACL, BFF, frontend).
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing #130.
- [ ] CI green — pending Gitea Actions run.
- [x] `docker compose up` brings up `beheer` (health-gated in `WAIT_SVCS`).
- [x] Docs — ADR-0025 + demo-script S-15a note.
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Verified locally

lint (`dotnet format`) ✓ · .NET unit (Acl 57 / Big 152 / EventSubscriber 19 / Bff 40) ✓ · frontend lint+test (8 projects) ✓ · frontend build (4 apps) ✓. Mutation ratchet: added a gateway unit test for the new `ListZaaktypenAsync` mapping so the ACL score holds. verify-stack (compose smoke + e2e) runs in CI.

## Notes for reviewers

- The BFF drops the ZGW URL from `BeheerZaaktype` (public-safe: identificatie + omschrijving only).
- The catalogus e2e asserts on the stable seeded `BIG-REGISTRATIE` (not a per-test reference), safe on the shared verify stack.
- Follow-ups: **S-15b** (#131) default-fill CRUD, **S-15c** (#132) medewerker-realm MFA.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)Reviewed-on: #133
2026-07-24 11:08:17 +00:00