0a97fa4bf79331d86106f458785ea46a4083c483
11
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 not
|
c8fdfbb699 |
feat(acl,domain): cancel the ZGW zaak on document-timeout expiry (S-10c, closes #106) (#109)
## S-10c · Close the ZGW zaak on document-timeout expiry (closes #106) Completes the S-10a/S-10b boundary flagged in ADR-0017: when a registration's 30-day document term lapses, the domain now cancels the **ZGW zaak** as well as marking the aggregate `Verlopen`, so OpenZaak and the register no longer diverge. ### What it does On expiry the `ExpireRegistrationWorker` calls the ACL to set the zaak to a distinct, non-terminal **`Geannuleerd`** status with a **`Vervallen`** resultaat (vs the approval `Afgehandeld` + `Geregistreerd`), resolved **by omschrijving** in the ACL — the ACL-first ordering mirrors approval so a failed ZGW call leaves the job for redelivery rather than diverging the two. **Path:** Flowable P30D timer → `RegistratieVerlopen` job → domain `ExpireRegistrationWorker` → ACL `POST /annuleringen` → ZGW `resultaten` + `statussen` (Geannuleerd) → aggregate `Verlopen`. ### Layers touched (each red→green) - **ACL gateway** — `SetZaakToCancellationStatusAsync` (Geannuleerd + Vervallen by name); approval now resolves its `Geregistreerd` resultaat by name too (a second resultaattype now exists). - **ACL service/API** — `AclService.CancelZaakAsync` + `POST /annuleringen`. - **Domain** — `IAclClient.CancelZaakAsync` + client; expiry worker cancels the zaak before advancing to `Verlopen`, guarded against redelivery double-cancel. - **Seed** — non-terminal `Geannuleerd` statustype (volgnummer 2; `Afgehandeld` → 3) + `Vervallen` resultaattype, both idempotent by omschrijving and sharing the zaaktype's procestype. - **Verify/integration** — ACL↔OpenZaak integration test (live `Geannuleerd` + resultaat); `run-domain-check.sh` fires the real P30D timer and asserts the zaak reaches `Geannuleerd` end-to-end; BDD scenario asserts cancel-on-timeout vs untouched-when-in-time. - **Docs** — ADR-0019 (cancellation modelling decision), demo-script, BACKLOG. ### Design note (ADR-0019) ZGW allows only one eindstatus per zaaktype, so `Geannuleerd` is modelled as a **non-terminal** status (it records a cancellation status + resultaat but does not set `einddatum`). This follows the issue's explicit "distinct statustype + resultaat" outcome; the shared-eindstatus alternative is recorded in the ADR. ### Tests Unit + acceptance all green locally (Acl 38, Big 134, Acceptance 17, Bff 33, EventSubscriber 19). Integration + verify-stack run in CI (need live OpenZaak + selectielijst egress). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Reviewed-on: #109 |
||
|
not
|
4777ff2b1d |
feat(workflow): document-wait task + 30-day timeout cancellation (S-10a, closes #102) (#105)
## What & why S-10a, the **workflow/timeout spine** of the (split) document-upload slice: the registratie process now parks at a **`WachtOpDocumenten`** user task with an **interrupting `P30D` boundary timer**. When the documents arrive the task completes and the process continues into the diploma routing (S-13) → Beoordelen; if the 30 days lapse, the timer cancels the wait, runs a `RegistratieVerlopen` external-worker task, and the domain expires the aggregate to a new terminal status **`Verlopen`**. Backend only — the real upload trigger (portal → BFF → ACL → Documenten API) is S-10b (#103). Closes #102 Mechanism recorded in **ADR-0017**; opened as proposal #104. Mirrors the S-14 escalation (boundary-timer + external-worker) and S-11 withdrawal (interrupting cancel) patterns. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (above). - [x] Failing test committed before the implementation (red→green pairs per layer). - [x] Implementation makes the test pass. - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #102`). - [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs (pending on this PR). - [x] `docker compose up` health unaffected (no new services; deploy path unchanged). - [x] Docs updated (ADR-0017, demo-script, BACKLOG split). - [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0017-document-wait-timeout-cancellation.md`). - [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`. ## Notes for reviewers - **Domain** (`Registration.Expire()` + `Verlopen`), **application** (`ExpireRegistrationWorker`), **infra** (`RegistratieVerlopenProcessor`/`Pump`, `IRegistratieVerlopenClient`, Flowable acquire/complete + `CompleteDocumentWaitAsync`) — the timeout counterpart to the OpenZaak/escalation worker trios; idempotent per §8.6. - **BPMN** verified live against a `flowable-rest` probe: complete `WachtOpDocumenten` → routes to Beoordelen; fire the P30D timer → `RegistratieVerlopen` job (carrying `registrationId`) + the wait task cancelled. `verify-domain` exercises both branches in-stack (completes the wait in every existing block; fires the timer and asserts `Verlopen` in a new block). - **Scope boundary:** on expiry the aggregate goes `Verlopen` and the process ends, but the ZGW *zaak* is not yet set to a cancellation status — that needs a new ACL method + statustype seeding and is folded into S-10b (noted in ADR-0017). - `CompleteDocumentWaitAsync` is built and HTTP-tested here but not yet called from a domain endpoint; S-10b wires the upload trigger to it. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Reviewed-on: #105 |
||
|
not
|
ccae27b3da |
feat(workflow): diploma-eligibility DMN routes foreign diplomas via CBGV-advies (S-13, closes #14) (#101)
## What & why S-13: a diploma's origin decides its route. A **DMN** (`diploma-eligibility`) is evaluated inline by the registratie process as a **`businessRuleTask`**; an exclusive gateway routes a **foreign** (Buitenlands) diploma through a new **CBGVAdvies** user task before `Beoordelen`, a **domestic** one straight there (PRD flow 4). The domain's only new job is carrying the diploma origin and passing it as a process start variable. Chose **Option B (DMN in the BPMN)** over the issue's literal "evaluated by the Domain Service via Workflow Client" wording — keeps the decision a first-class workflow artefact and §8.2 clean. Rationale in **ADR-0016** (proposal #100); noted on this issue. Closes #14 ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (above). - [x] Failing test committed before the implementation. - [x] Implementation makes the test pass. - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #14`). - [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs. - [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (additive; DMN deployed by flowable-init). - [x] Docs updated (ADR-0016, demo note). - [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0016-diploma-eligibility-dmn.md`). - [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`. ## How it was built (TDD) - **Domain**: `DiplomaOrigin` on the aggregate + submit command; threaded through the process-start port so the Workflow Client emits a `diplomaOrigin` start variable. Red → green. - **DMN + BPMN**: `workflows/diploma-eligibility.dmn` (origin → route); `businessRuleTask` + exclusive gateway + `CBGVAdvies` user task in `registratie.bpmn`; DMN deployed to Flowable's DMN engine by `flowable-init`. - **Both paths**: `Een diploma op herkomst routeren` acceptance scenarios (origin carried into the process) + unit tests; verify-domain drives a foreign registration through CBGVAdvies→Beoordelen and the domestic one straight to Beoordelen — exercising both DMN branches live. ## Notes for reviewers - Deviation from the issue's Option-A wording is deliberate and recorded (ADR-0016); the outcome is unchanged. - The self-service eIDAS→foreign wiring is out of scope here (this slice is area:domain + area:workflow); the domain submit accepts an optional `diplomaOrigin` so the foreign path is drivable. - Local green: domain unit 109, acceptance 15, `dotnet format`, Release build (0 errors), **domain mutation 95.39%** (break 90). The DMN/`businessRuleTask` REST wiring is CI-verified on verify-stack (no local full-stack run here). Reviewed-on: #101 |
||
|
not
|
7bcbc726ce |
feat(workflow): beoordeling escalation to teamlead after 14 days (S-14, closes #15) (#99)
## What & why S-14: a beoordeling a behandelaar does not pick up within **14 days** escalates to the **teamlead**. A non-interrupting `P14D` boundary timer on the `Beoordelen` user task fires an external-worker task (`BeoordelingEscaleren`); the domain's escalation worker reassigns the still-open task's candidate group from `behandelaar` to `teamlead`. The task keeps its identity — only who may claim it changes. The escalation-via-external-worker decision is recorded in **ADR-0015** (proposal #98); it upholds §8.2 (the Workflow Client stays the only code that talks to Flowable) and keeps Flowable a stock image. Closes #15 ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (above). - [x] Failing test committed before the implementation. - [x] Implementation makes the test pass; refactor commit if structure improved. - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #NN`). - [x] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs. - [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (no new services; escalation is additive to the domain worker). - [x] Docs updated (ADR-0015, demo note). - [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0015-beoordeling-escalation.md`). - [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`. ## How it was built (TDD) - **Workflow Client** (`IBeoordelingEscalatieClient`): acquire `BeoordelingEscaleren` jobs → find the open `Beoordelen` task in the instance → add `teamlead`/remove `behandelaar` candidate group → complete the job. Red → green. - **Escalation drain loop** (`BeoordelingEscalatieProcessor`) + hosted `BeoordelingEscalatiePump`, mirroring the OpenZaak worker. Red → green. - **BPMN**: non-interrupting `P14D` boundary timer on `Beoordelen` → external task → escalation end. - **Both branches** (escalate after timeout; no-op when completed in time) covered by the `Een beoordeling escaleren` acceptance scenarios + Workflow Client unit tests. - **Live integration**: `verify-domain` fires the timer early via Flowable's management API and asserts the reassignment to teamlead. ## Notes for reviewers - Interface segregation: escalation is on `IBeoordelingEscalatieClient`, separate from the OpenZaak worker's `IExternalWorkerClient`. - Reassignment is two REST hops (add teamlead, remove behandelaar); idempotent on redelivery — see ADR-0015 consequences. - Local checks green: domain unit tests (104), acceptance (13), `dotnet format --verify-no-changes`, Release build (0 errors), **domain mutation 96.69%** (break 90). The `run-domain-check.sh` escalation path is CI-verified on verify-stack (local full-stack run is constrained here). - `BeoordelingEscalatiePump` excluded from mutation, mirroring the existing `OpenZaakJobPump` exclusion. Reviewed-on: #99 |
||
|
not
|
94699f3603 |
feat(self-service): trek aanvraag in — withdrawal action (S-11c-2, closes #12) (#93)
## What & why Final sub-slice of **S-11 · Withdrawal (Flow 3)** — the user-facing "trek aanvraag in" action, which **closes #12**. - **self-service portal**: the submit confirmation gains a **"Trek aanvraag in"** button. It withdraws the just-submitted registration via `postSelfServiceRegistrationsIdWithdraw(reference)`; success shows an *ingetrokken* confirmation, a failure is surfaced (`role="alert"`) and the action stays available — same confirm-and-surface pattern as submit. - **acceptance**: `Een registratie intrekken` — owner withdraws → INGETROKKEN + workflow cancelled; a different bsn is reported not-found. - **e2e**: `withdrawal.spec.ts` — DigiD submit → trek aanvraag in → the portal confirms ingetrokken. - **docs**: demo-script + frontend-decisions. Together with S-11a (#88), S-11b (#89), S-11c-1 (#90), this completes the flow: citizen withdraws → domain INGETROKKEN → BPMN message event cancels the process → the case leaves the behandelaar's werkbak. Closes #12 ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (#12). - [x] Failing tests committed before the implementation. - [x] Implementation makes the tests pass. - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #12`). - [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs. - [x] `docker compose up` unaffected. - [x] Docs updated (demo-script + frontend-decisions). - [x] ADR — ADR-0014 (from S-11b) covers the cancellation decision; nothing new here. ## Notes for reviewers - Full local gate run before pushing: `dotnet format --verify-no-changes` clean; `make unit` green (Acceptance **11** incl. the 2 new withdrawal scenarios, Big 95, BFF 30, Acl 27, EventSubscriber 19); self-service lint/test/build green (9 tests, incl. the 2 new withdraw tests). - `withdrawal.spec.ts` waits on the *ingetrokken* confirmation (which only renders after the withdraw POST returns), so it can't cancel the request early (the 499 lesson from #87). Live-validated by verify-stack. Reviewed-on: #93 |
||
|
not
|
d226b6402d |
feat(#13): S-12c-2 — behandel decide → domain + complete workflow task (#86)
## What & why
Second half of **S-12c** (behandel-portal backend), completing the decision path per **ADR-0013**:
- **Domain:** `BeoordeelRegistratie` now, after applying the decision (aggregate + ACL for approval), **completes the open Flowable `Beoordelen` task** for that registration (found by registrationId) with the besluit, so the workflow advances. No open task → the decision still stands (completes nothing); idempotent.
- **BFF:** `POST /behandel/registrations/{id}/decide` behind the medewerker/`behandelaar` policy, forwarding `goedkeuren`/`afwijzen` to the domain. Validates the besluit vocabulary (400 on unknown) without troubling the domain.
Behavior: decide is **401** without a token, **403** without the role, **400** for an unknown besluit, **204** (forwarded) for a behandelaar.
This completes the behandel backend. **S-12d** (the Angular behandel-portal + Playwright e2e) closes umbrella #13 and retires the temporary `/approve`.
## Definition of Done
- [x] Linked issue: #13 (umbrella, `refs`)
- [x] Tests first; red → green per layer
- [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 79, bff 27, acceptance 9 (acl/event-subscriber unaffected)
- [x] Beoordeling acceptance scenario asserts task completion (goedkeuren + afwijzen)
- [x] openapi.json + api-client regenerated (drift guard passes)
- [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): **domain 100%, bff 100%**
- [ ] CI green (pending)
Part of #13.
Reviewed-on: #86
|
||
|
not
|
d4ed0ffc22 |
feat(#13): S-12a — beoordeling decision model (domain) (#82)
## What & why First sub-slice of **S-12 (#13)** — the **beoordeling decision model** in the Domain Service. Foundation for the behandel-portal: it gives the domain a proper decision lifecycle before any UI/Flowable/BFF work. - **Statuses:** add `InBehandeling` and `Afgewezen` to `RegistrationStatus`. - **Aggregate:** `TakeIntoBehandeling()` (`Ingediend → InBehandeling`, idempotent, guards terminal states); generalise the behandelaar decision — `Approve()` (requires a zaak) and new `Reject()` both act on an `Ingediend`/`InBehandeling` registration → `Ingeschreven`/`Afgewezen`. - **Use-case:** `BeoordeelRegistratie` (`goedkeuren` sets the zaak's final status via the ACL §8.1 → `Ingeschreven`; `afwijzen` → `Afgewezen`, domain-only for now). Idempotent. - **Endpoint:** `POST /registrations/{id}/decide` (`{ "besluit": "goedkeuren" | "afwijzen" }`), superseding the temporary `/approve` (retired when the portal lands, S-12d). - **BDD:** `EenRegistratieBeoordelen.feature` — goedkeuren + afwijzen scenarios (feature-scoped bindings). **Scoped out** to later S-12 sub-slices: Flowable user-task claim/complete + BPMN `userTask` (S-12b), BFF `/behandel/*` + medewerker authz (S-12c), the Angular behandel-portal + e2e (S-12d), and propagating a *rejection* to the zaak/projection via the ACL. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked issue: #13 (umbrella; this PR `refs`, does not close) - [x] Tests first; red → green per behaviour - [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 65, acceptance 9 - [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): domain 98.77%, no survivors in new code (the one unkilled mutant is the pre-existing `FlowableWorkflowClient` baseline) - [ ] CI green (pending) Part of #13. Reviewed-on: #82 |
||
 notandClaude Opus 4.8
|
5d32d4f15e |
test(bff): acceptance scenario for BFF access (valid/invalid tokens) (refs #8)
Use-case-level BDD (Reqnroll) driving the real BFF over HTTP with fake downstreams and locally-minted tokens: a valid DigiD token is accepted and the bsn forwarded to the domain; a tokenless submit is 401; the openbaar register is anonymous and never exposes the bsn (ADR-0010). Real Keycloak validation is the verify-bff check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
notandClaude Opus 4.8
|
79dcd8f14b |
test(domain): acceptance scenario for submitting a registration (refs #6)
Use-case-level BDD (Reqnroll) for S-05: a zorgprofessional submits a registration; the Domain Service starts the registratie process and the OpenZaakAanmaken external task opens a zaak via the ACL, recorded on the aggregate (ADR-0009). Driven against in-memory Workflow Client and ACL stand-ins; real Flowable+ACL+OpenZaak delivery is the live-stack verify-domain check. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
notandClaude Opus 4.8
|
c70840e5b7 |
test(event-subscriber): project zaak-created notifications into the read projection (refs #7)
Failing unit + acceptance tests for the Event Subscriber's NotificationProjector: a zaken/zaak/create notification yields one INGEDIEND projection row, duplicate deliveries collapse to one row, non-zaak/non-create notifications are ignored, and a rebuild repopulates the projection from the durable notification log (PRD §8.4). The projector is a no-op stub so the tests compile and fail on the assertions; the implementation follows in the green commit. The notification log doubles as the idempotency guard and rebuild source so a rebuild needs no OpenZaak access (§8.1). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
 eho
|
28041228bd | test(acl): BDD acceptance scenario for opening a zaak (closes #5) (#49) |