The BIG Domain Service Api wires the use cases and the hosted job worker:
POST /registrations creates the aggregate and starts the registratie process,
returning 202 with a location; GET /registrations/{id} reads the aggregate so
the eventually-opened zaak URL can be observed (ADR-0009). The Workflow Client
is registered once behind both Flowable ports; the ACL client and in-memory
store complete the wiring. Verified against a live flowable-rest: submit starts
a parked process and the worker polls it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Failing infrastructure unit tests (stub HttpMessageHandler, fakes):
- FlowableWorkflowClient starts a process with the registrationId variable and
returns the instance id; acquires OpenZaakAanmaken jobs (topic/workerId/lock)
and parses their registrationId; completes a job with the zaakUrl variable —
request URIs match flowable-rest's service/ and external-job-api/ paths.
- AclHttpClient POSTs the bsn to the ACL and returns the zaak URL.
- InMemoryRegistrationStore saves/reads/upserts by id.
- OpenZaakJobProcessor acquires, opens a zaak, completes the job; leaves a failing
job uncompleted for redelivery; polls harmlessly when idle.
Adapters are stubs so the tests compile and fail on their assertions; the green
commit implements them against the REST contract verified on a live Flowable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Failing application-layer tests over fake ports (IWorkflowClient, IAclClient,
IRegistrationStore):
- Submit persists an INGEDIEND registration and starts the registratie process,
recording the instance id — and persists *before* starting, so the worker can
correlate the OpenZaakAanmaken job back to its aggregate (ADR-0009).
- The worker opens a zaak via the ACL and attaches it; an unknown registration
throws (job left for redelivery); a redelivered job is idempotent and opens no
second zaak (§8.6).
Handlers are stubs (no persistence / no ACL call) so the tests compile and fail
on their assertions; the green commit implements them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Failing unit tests for the Registration aggregate root: a submission starts
in INGEDIEND carrying its bsn, an empty/whitespace/null bsn is rejected, the
started process-instance id is remembered, and attaching the zaak the ACL
opened records its URL idempotently (a conflicting URL is rejected) while the
status stays INGEDIEND.
The aggregate is a stub (no-op mutators, empty bsn) so the tests compile and
fail on their assertions; the green commit implements the invariants.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add the projection persistence and the two services around it:
- Projection.ReadModel: a shared EF Core (Npgsql) read model owning the projection
schema — register_projection + the subscriber's processed_notifications log — plus
EfProjectionStore / EfNotificationLog (atomic record-or-skip on the PK for idempotency)
and the initial migration. One rebuildable store, written by the subscriber and read
by projection-api (ADR-0008).
- EventSubscriber.Api: POST /notifications NRC callback (enforces the abonnement bearer,
401 without it per ADR-0007), POST /admin/rebuild, /health. Migrates on start.
- ProjectionApi.Api: GET /register, GET /register/{id}, /health — the read side.
dotnet-ef pinned as a local tool for migrations; NuGetAuditMode=direct so EF's
design-time-only tooling transitive doesn't flag the shipped build.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Failing unit + acceptance tests for the Event Subscriber's NotificationProjector:
a zaken/zaak/create notification yields one INGEDIEND projection row, duplicate
deliveries collapse to one row, non-zaak/non-create notifications are ignored, and
a rebuild repopulates the projection from the durable notification log (PRD §8.4).
The projector is a no-op stub so the tests compile and fail on the assertions; the
implementation follows in the green commit. The notification log doubles as the
idempotency guard and rebuild source so a rebuild needs no OpenZaak access (§8.1).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
S-04a: the deferred S-04 acceptance criterion. A gated Acl.IntegrationTests
project (Category=Integration) drives the real OpenZaakGateway against the
running compose stack — real ZGW JWT auth and the real POST /zaken contract a
stubbed HttpMessageHandler cannot exercise. The lane is kept out of the fast
checks: make unit filters Category!=Integration, Stryker is pinned to Acl.Tests,
and a new make integration target brings the stack up, seeds a published zaaktype
and tears down.
Red: against real OpenZaak the gateway POST fails 400 — JsonContent streams the
body chunked and OpenZaak's uwsgi rejects it. Fixed in the next commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
