The new SetZaakToCancellationStatusAsync added surviving mutants (uncovered
null-guards and the failure-action messages) that dropped the ACL mutation
score below the 90% break threshold. Add null-argument and rejected-POST tests
for the cancellation path; score back to 93.46%.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds an ACL↔OpenZaak integration test asserting SetZaakToCancellationStatusAsync
records the Geannuleerd status + a resultaat against real OpenZaak, and extends
the domain verify script to confirm a timed-out registration's zaak is cancelled
to Geannuleerd end-to-end.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The ACL exposes zaak cancellation as a service operation the domain calls on
document-timeout expiry; it default-fills the zaaktype and dates the status
today, translating the domain intent to the ZGW cancellation status/resultaat.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
SetZaakToCancellationStatusAsync resolves the cancellation statustype and
resultaat by omschrijving and posts resultaat-then-status, mirroring the
approval path. Approval now resolves its Geregistreerd resultaat by name too,
since a second resultaattype now exists.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
S-10c: the document-timeout branch must set the zaak to a distinct
cancellation statustype (Geannuleerd) + resultaat (Vervallen), resolved by
omschrijving. With a second resultaattype present, approval must also
resolve its resultaat (Geregistreerd) by name rather than taking the first.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## What & why
S-10b: the self-service **diploma upload** is now real. After submitting, the citizen picks a PDF and
uploads it; the portal base64-encodes it client-side → BFF → domain → **ACL**, which stores it in the
ZGW **Documenten (DRC) API** as an `enkelvoudiginformatieobject` and relates it to the zaak, then the
`WachtOpDocumenten` wait completes and the case advances to beoordeling. Per §8.1 only the ACL talks to
ZGW.
Closes#103
Mechanism in **ADR-0018** (proposal #107). Builds on S-10a (#102). The zaak-close-on-expiry item is
carved to **#106 (S-10c)**.
## Definition of Done
- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation (red→green per layer).
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #103`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs (pending on this PR).
- [x] `docker compose up` health unaffected (ACL boots on a placeholder informatieobjecttype URL; the real one is injected by verify-domain).
- [x] Docs updated (ADR-0018, demo-script, BACKLOG + S-10c).
- [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0018-diploma-upload-via-acl-documenten.md`).
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.
## Notes for reviewers
- **ACL** (`OpenZaakGateway.StoreDocumentAsync` + `AclService.StoreDiplomaAsync` + `POST /documenten`) reuses the existing gateway patterns (ZGW Bearer, buffered non-chunked body, **no CRS** — Documenten isn't geo). Unit-tested via the stub handler; an **integration test** stores a real document against live OpenZaak (verify-acl).
- **Transport:** base64 JSON on every hop (portal encodes client-side) — I deviated from proposal #107's multipart to keep one contract shape and avoid `IFormFile`/antiforgery/multipart-client plumbing; fine at diploma size (ADR-0018 §Alternatives).
- **Infra:** `seed_catalogus.py` seeds + publishes a "Diploma" `informatieobjecttype` and relates it to the zaaktype (while both concept); `verify-domain` injects its URL into the ACL. No new ZGW scopes (seed applicatie has `heeft_alle_autorisaties`).
- **e2e:** uploads a real PDF (`setInputFiles`) after the openbaar INGEDIEND row confirms the zaak is open (so storage doesn't race the OpenZaak worker).
- **Scope boundary:** the ZGW zaak is not set to a cancellation status on 30-day expiry — that's #106 (S-10c).
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Reviewed-on: #108
## What & why
Before this change the self-service confirmation and the openbaar register showed **different** identifiers, so a citizen could not look their registration back up (#78). Now both surface the same **reference**:
- **domain → ACL (write):** the domain `registrationId` is set as the zaak's `identificatie` on `POST /zaken`.
- **event-subscriber → ACL (read):** the subscriber reads the zaak's `identificatie` back through the ACL (§8.1 — only the ACL talks to ZGW) via a new `POST /zaken/reference`, and stores it on the projection row **and** the `processed_notifications` replay log.
- **BFF + openbaar:** the public view exposes `id/status/reference` (never bsn/naam) and searches by id or reference; the register's "Referentie" column shows the reference.
Storing the reference in the replay log keeps ADR-0008's **rebuild-is-log-only** invariant intact — `/admin/rebuild` reproduces the reference without re-reading the ACL.
Decision recorded in **ADR-0012**.
## Definition of Done
- [x] Linked issue: #78
- [x] Tests written first; red → green per layer
- [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 49, acl 27, bff 20, event-subscriber 19, acceptance 7
- [x] Frontend lint + test green (`nx run-many -t lint test`)
- [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): acl 100%, event-subscriber 100%, bff 100%, domain 98.41% (pre-existing FlowableWorkflowClient baseline, untouched)
- [x] e2e extended: confirmation reference == register reference
- [x] openapi.json + api-client regenerated (drift guard green)
- [x] ADR-0012 added; demo-script note appended
- [x] `Acl__BaseUrl` wired for the subscriber in compose
closes#78
Reviewed-on: #79
## What & why
S-09b (#75, split from #10) — the **approval flow** that completes the walking skeleton. A behandelaar can now approve a submitted registration; the entry flips from `INGEDIEND` to `INGESCHREVEN` in the public register. Flow: `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW `/statussen`) → OpenZaak → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar.
## Changes (bottom-up, each red→green TDD)
- **Domain** — `RegistrationStatus.Ingeschreven` + `Registration.Approve()` (guards: opened zaak, only from INGEDIEND); `ApproveRegistration` use case (idempotent) + temp `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` endpoint; `IAclClient.ApproveZaakAsync`.
- **ACL** — resolves the zaaktype's **eindstatus** from the catalogus (`isEindstatus` / highest volgnummer) and POSTs a ZGW status; exposed as `POST /statussen`. Unit + real-OpenZaak integration test.
- **Event-subscriber** — binds NRC `hoofdObject`, projects a `status`/`create` as `INGESCHREVEN` keyed on the zaak (updates the existing row), **without reading OpenZaak** (§8.1). Retains the ZGW `resource` in the log (new column + EF migration) so a rebuild reproduces the status.
- **e2e** — extended: submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN.
- **Docs** — ADR-0011 (the two non-obvious decisions + the walking-skeleton assumption) + demo note.
## Key decisions (see ADR-0011)
- **ACL discovers the eindstatus** (chosen over injecting a statustype URL): no new config/seed plumbing, domain stays ZGW-ignorant.
- **Any post-creation status-set ⇒ INGESCHREVEN**: in the walking skeleton the only status ever set after creation is the approval, and the subscriber may not read ZGW — documented to tighten when more transitions arrive (S-12+).
## Verification
- All .NET unit suites green locally (domain 47, acl 11, event-subscriber 14, bff 16, acceptance 7); Release build + `dotnet format` clean.
- No new compose config (the eindstatus-discovery approach avoided it).
- The real-OpenZaak integration test (ACL status-set) and the full submit→approve→visible e2e run in CI `verify-stack` (live NRC→projection + selectielijst egress, not reproducible locally).
closes#75
Reviewed-on: #77
The hosted runner can't reach the stack's published ports (sibling containers),
so run the seed and the test as containers joined to the OpenZaak network,
reaching it by container IP — a single-label host like 'openzaak' isn't URL-valid
for OpenZaak's own URLValidator, but an IPv4 literal is. Code is delivered via
image build / docker cp (bind mounts don't reach the daemon either).
- infra/run-integration.sh: up -> wait healthy (docker inspect) -> seed published
zaaktype (python container on the net) -> build + run the test image on the net
-> always tear down. Plain docker primitives only (portable docker/podman).
- services/acl/Dockerfile.integration: builds + runs Acl.IntegrationTests; dotnet
lives in the image, so the CI job needs only Docker (no setup-dotnet).
- make integration now delegates to the script; re-added the Gitea Actions job.
Supersedes the local-only gap documented earlier; #55 is no longer needed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
OpenZaak runs behind uwsgi, which rejects a chunked request body with 400.
JsonContent streams without a Content-Length (Transfer-Encoding: chunked), so
buffer it first. Only a real OpenZaak surfaces this — the integration test from
the previous commit now passes. A unit test asserts a Content-Length is sent
(captured before the stub reads/buffers the body), guarding the fix in the fast
lane and killing the Stryker mutant that would otherwise survive.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
S-04a: the deferred S-04 acceptance criterion. A gated Acl.IntegrationTests
project (Category=Integration) drives the real OpenZaakGateway against the
running compose stack — real ZGW JWT auth and the real POST /zaken contract a
stubbed HttpMessageHandler cannot exercise. The lane is kept out of the fast
checks: make unit filters Category!=Integration, Stryker is pinned to Acl.Tests,
and a new make integration target brings the stack up, seeds a published zaaktype
and tears down.
Red: against real OpenZaak the gateway POST fails 400 — JsonContent streams the
body chunked and OpenZaak's uwsgi rejects it. Fixed in the next commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Configure Stryker.NET for the ACL in solution mode (Acl.slnx), so both
Acl.Application and Acl.Infrastructure — the two projects under test — are
mutated while Acl.Api (untested) is skipped. Record the repo-wide mutation
baseline as the ratchet (CLAUDE.md §5): observed score 95%, enforced break
threshold 90% (one-mutant headroom over the ~20-mutant surface). The ACL is the
first service with branching logic, so it sets the baseline; later slices
ratchet it up deliberately, never down.
Add a `mutation` make target (`dotnet tool restore` + `dotnet stryker`) and wire
it into the `make ci` aggregate, keeping `make ci` an exact mirror of the
pipeline.
Refs #47.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Stryker exposed thin ACL tests (35% mutation score): the suite never asserted
the geo CRS headers, the ArgumentNullException guards, the non-success and
empty-body error paths, or the structure of the minted ZGW JWT — so mutating
any of those survived.
Strengthen the unit tests to kill those mutants:
- assert Accept-Crs / Content-Crs are EPSG:4326,
- assert OpenZaakAsync rejects a null request/registration without calling out,
- assert a non-2xx response throws and an empty body throws InvalidOperationException,
- decode the Bearer token and assert the HS256 header + acl identity claims.
Raises the ACL mutation score to 95%. The one remaining survivor mutates only
the exception *message* text (an equivalent mutant — message strings are not
worth a brittle assertion).
Refs #47.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the ACL multi-stage Dockerfile and .dockerignore, and expands
infra/docker-compose.yml from the BFF-only stub to the full development
stack (OpenZaak, NRC, Keycloak, Flowable, ACL, BFF). Without these
files a fresh checkout cannot satisfy `make smoke`'s `docker compose
up --build --wait` step, so `make ci` could never go green.
`make lint && make build && make unit` verified green locally.
`make smoke` requires Docker Compose v2 (`--wait` flag); on this dev box
only podman-compose is available — smoke will be verified on the
respellion-linux CI runner once it is registered (see docs/runbooks/ci.md).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
notandClaude Opus 4.8
eho