Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
8591b89e0c feat(bff): POST /self-service/registrations/{id}/withdraw, owner-scoped (refs #12)
The domain withdraw command carries the caller's bsn and owner-scopes the aggregate; unknown or

not-owned is 404 (indistinguishable). The BFF forwards the DigiD token's bsn and relays 204/404.

Regenerate the OpenAPI spec + Angular client for the new endpoint.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-16 13:54:45 +02:00
a34caba9ea feat(domain): withdrawal cancels the registratie process (S-11b, refs #12) (#89)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m18s
CI / build (push) Successful in 57s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m10s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m38s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m22s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m18s
## What & why

Second sub-slice of **S-11 · Withdrawal (Flow 3)** (#12). S-11a (#88) made a withdrawal advance the aggregate to INGETROKKEN; this sub-slice **cancels the running Flowable process** so the withdrawn case leaves the behandelaar's werkbak.

- **BPMN** (`registratie.bpmn`): an interrupting message boundary event (`RegistratieIngetrokken`) on the `Beoordelen` task, routing to a dedicated "Registratie ingetrokken" end event.
- **Workflow Client**: `WithdrawBeoordelingAsync(executionId)` delivers `messageEventReceived` to the task's execution (PUT); `BeoordelingTask` now carries its `executionId`.
- **`WithdrawRegistration` handler**: after the domain transition, finds the open `Beoordelen` task for the registration and delivers the withdrawal message — best-effort, mirroring how the beoordeling completes its task.
- **Werkbak**: also filters out registrations that are no longer open, so a withdrawn case never surfaces even in the brief window before cancellation lands.
- **ADR-0014** records the decision (message event in BPMN vs. deleting the instance from code).
- **verify (`run-domain-check.sh`)**: a second registration parks at `Beoordelen`, is withdrawn via the domain, and the check asserts its `Beoordelen` task disappears — so verify-stack validates the live Flowable message correlation.

Refs #12 (S-11c — the BFF + self-service "trek aanvraag in" button + e2e — closes it).

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (#12).
- [x] Failing tests committed before the implementation (red → green per commit).
- [x] Implementation makes the tests pass.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #12`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` unaffected (BPMN redeploys on a fresh CI DB via flowable-init).
- [x] ADR added (ADR-0014).
- [x] Docs — the user-visible demo note lands with S-11c.

## Notes for reviewers

- Verified locally: `Big.Tests` 94/94 pass; `Big.Api` builds; `registratie.bpmn` is well-formed.
- The Flowable message-correlation REST shape is validated **live** by verify-stack (the Workflow Client unit tests stub the exchange and assert only the request shape, per ADR-0009) — the new `run-domain-check.sh` withdrawal step is that live check.
- Known gap (ADR-0014): a withdrawal that races ahead of the process reaching `Beoordelen` finds no task to cancel; the aggregate is still INGETROKKEN and the werkbak filter hides it, but that instance parks unattended. A process-level event subprocess would close the gap — deferred.

Reviewed-on: #89
2026-07-16 11:09:28 +00:00
3abf8f7ccf feat(behandel): behandel-portal — werkbak + beoordeling (closes #13) (#87)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI / build (push) Successful in 53s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m3s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m30s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 4m59s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m5s
## What & why

Finishes **S-12 · Behandel-portal — werkbak + beoordeling**. The backend sub-slices (S-12a/b/c-1/c-2) were merged, but the slice's stated outcome — a behandel *portal* with medewerker login, a werkbak, and decide — had no frontend. This adds it.

- **`libs/auth`**: `MedewerkerAuthService` + `provideMedewerkerAuth` (Keycloak `medewerker` realm), a `roles`/`hasRole` surface on the shared `AuthService`, and a realm-roles protocol mapper so the SPA can read `behandelaar`/`teamlead` from the token. The BFF remains the security boundary (ADR-0013).
- **`apps/behandel`**: a new Nx Angular app mirroring self-service — medewerker OIDC login and a **werkbak** page listing registrations awaiting beoordeling (`GET /behandel/werkbak`) with per-row **Goedkeuren/Afwijzen** actions (`POST /behandel/registrations/{id}/decide`) that refresh the list. NL DS/Utrecht, standalone + signals.
- **e2e**: the walking-skeleton happy path now approves through the real portal (behandelaar logs in, finds the row by reference, clicks Goedkeuren) instead of the temporary admin endpoint.
- **infra/docs**: behandel service in compose (`:8142`, depends on Keycloak); added to the smoke `WAIT_SVCS` + CI log dump; `frontend-decisions.md` and `demo-script.md` updated.

Closes #13

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked Gitea issue (above).
- [x] Failing test committed before the implementation.
- [x] Implementation makes the test pass; refactor commit if structure improved.
- [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #13`).
- [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs.
- [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes. *(behandel image + container verified locally; full stack gated in CI.)*
- [x] Docs updated if behaviour, contracts, or operations changed.
- [x] ADR added — ADR-0013 (merged with the backend sub-slices) already covers the wiring; no new decision here.
- [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`.

## Notes for reviewers

- Verified locally: auth + behandel + all frontend projects pass lint & unit tests (incl. axe WCAG 2.1 AA); production build green; the behandel Docker image builds and serves with the correct baked `medewerker` config + SPA fallback.
- The full compose-up smoke, e2e, and mutation are CI-gated (known local full-stack verify limits).
- **Follow-ups (not in scope):** the `WerkbakItem` contract has no citizen name (werkbak shows the BSN) — adding one is a BFF+domain contract change; and the domain's temporary admin `approve` endpoint is now unused by the e2e and could be removed.

Reviewed-on: #87
2026-07-16 08:31:57 +00:00
d226b6402d feat(#13): S-12c-2 — behandel decide → domain + complete workflow task (#86)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m17s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m0s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m8s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m20s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 4m57s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m3s
## What & why

Second half of **S-12c** (behandel-portal backend), completing the decision path per **ADR-0013**:

- **Domain:** `BeoordeelRegistratie` now, after applying the decision (aggregate + ACL for approval), **completes the open Flowable `Beoordelen` task** for that registration (found by registrationId) with the besluit, so the workflow advances. No open task → the decision still stands (completes nothing); idempotent.
- **BFF:** `POST /behandel/registrations/{id}/decide` behind the medewerker/`behandelaar` policy, forwarding `goedkeuren`/`afwijzen` to the domain. Validates the besluit vocabulary (400 on unknown) without troubling the domain.

Behavior: decide is **401** without a token, **403** without the role, **400** for an unknown besluit, **204** (forwarded) for a behandelaar.

This completes the behandel backend. **S-12d** (the Angular behandel-portal + Playwright e2e) closes umbrella #13 and retires the temporary `/approve`.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked issue: #13 (umbrella, `refs`)
- [x] Tests first; red → green per layer
- [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 79, bff 27, acceptance 9 (acl/event-subscriber unaffected)
- [x] Beoordeling acceptance scenario asserts task completion (goedkeuren + afwijzen)
- [x] openapi.json + api-client regenerated (drift guard passes)
- [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): **domain 100%, bff 100%**
- [ ] CI green (pending)

Part of #13.

Reviewed-on: #86
2026-07-16 06:53:52 +00:00
9c3da48d8e feat(#13): S-12c-1 — behandel BFF auth + werkbak (ADR-0013) (#85)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m26s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m19s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m37s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m54s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m18s
## What & why

First half of **S-12c** (behandel-portal backend), per **ADR-0013** (decisions recorded in #84):

- **BFF multi-realm auth.** A second JWT bearer scheme (`medewerker`) alongside the default `digid` scheme. On validation it lifts Keycloak's `realm_access.roles` onto the principal, and a `behandelaar` policy (medewerker scheme + `behandelaar` role) gates `/behandel/*`. Self-service keeps the digid scheme.
- **Werkbak = Flowable tasks.** The domain `Werkbak` query reads the open `Beoordelen` tasks (§8.2, S-12b's `IUserTaskClient`) and enriches each with its aggregate's bsn + status; `GET /behandel/werkbak` (domain) is proxied by the BFF `GET /behandel/werkbak` behind the behandelaar policy. The read projection stays the anonymous openbaar model (no premature `IN_BEHANDELING`/personal-data plumbing — deferred in ADR-0008).

Behavior: `/behandel/werkbak` is **401** without a token, **403** for a medewerker lacking the role, **200 + werkbak** for a behandelaar.

**S-12c-2** (next): `POST /behandel/registrations/{id}/decide` → domain decision + complete the Flowable task.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked issue: #13 (umbrella, `refs`); closes the adr-proposal #84
- [x] Tests first; red → green per layer
- [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 78, bff 23, acceptance 9 (+ acl/event-subscriber unaffected)
- [x] api-client `test` green; openapi.json regenerated (drift guard passes)
- [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): **domain 100%, bff 100%**
- [x] ADR-0013 added; `Keycloak__MedewerkerAuthority` wired into compose
- [ ] CI green (pending)

Part of #13. closes #84

Reviewed-on: #85
2026-07-15 09:54:01 +00:00
d4ed0ffc22 feat(#13): S-12a — beoordeling decision model (domain) (#82)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m15s
CI / build (push) Successful in 58s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m9s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m23s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m3s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 8m37s
## What & why

First sub-slice of **S-12 (#13)** — the **beoordeling decision model** in the Domain Service. Foundation for the behandel-portal: it gives the domain a proper decision lifecycle before any UI/Flowable/BFF work.

- **Statuses:** add `InBehandeling` and `Afgewezen` to `RegistrationStatus`.
- **Aggregate:** `TakeIntoBehandeling()` (`Ingediend → InBehandeling`, idempotent, guards terminal states); generalise the behandelaar decision — `Approve()` (requires a zaak) and new `Reject()` both act on an `Ingediend`/`InBehandeling` registration → `Ingeschreven`/`Afgewezen`.
- **Use-case:** `BeoordeelRegistratie` (`goedkeuren` sets the zaak's final status via the ACL §8.1 → `Ingeschreven`; `afwijzen` → `Afgewezen`, domain-only for now). Idempotent.
- **Endpoint:** `POST /registrations/{id}/decide` (`{ "besluit": "goedkeuren" | "afwijzen" }`), superseding the temporary `/approve` (retired when the portal lands, S-12d).
- **BDD:** `EenRegistratieBeoordelen.feature` — goedkeuren + afwijzen scenarios (feature-scoped bindings).

**Scoped out** to later S-12 sub-slices: Flowable user-task claim/complete + BPMN `userTask` (S-12b), BFF `/behandel/*` + medewerker authz (S-12c), the Angular behandel-portal + e2e (S-12d), and propagating a *rejection* to the zaak/projection via the ACL.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked issue: #13 (umbrella; this PR `refs`, does not close)
- [x] Tests first; red → green per behaviour
- [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 65, acceptance 9
- [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): domain 98.77%, no survivors in new code (the one unkilled mutant is the pre-existing `FlowableWorkflowClient` baseline)
- [ ] CI green (pending)

Part of #13.

Reviewed-on: #82
2026-07-15 07:12:19 +00:00
9997da8beb feat(#78): one citizen reference across self-service and the openbaar register (#79)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m25s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m17s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m33s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m54s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m34s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m39s
## What & why

Before this change the self-service confirmation and the openbaar register showed **different** identifiers, so a citizen could not look their registration back up (#78). Now both surface the same **reference**:

- **domain → ACL (write):** the domain `registrationId` is set as the zaak's `identificatie` on `POST /zaken`.
- **event-subscriber → ACL (read):** the subscriber reads the zaak's `identificatie` back through the ACL (§8.1 — only the ACL talks to ZGW) via a new `POST /zaken/reference`, and stores it on the projection row **and** the `processed_notifications` replay log.
- **BFF + openbaar:** the public view exposes `id/status/reference` (never bsn/naam) and searches by id or reference; the register's "Referentie" column shows the reference.

Storing the reference in the replay log keeps ADR-0008's **rebuild-is-log-only** invariant intact — `/admin/rebuild` reproduces the reference without re-reading the ACL.

Decision recorded in **ADR-0012**.

## Definition of Done

- [x] Linked issue: #78
- [x] Tests written first; red → green per layer
- [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 49, acl 27, bff 20, event-subscriber 19, acceptance 7
- [x] Frontend lint + test green (`nx run-many -t lint test`)
- [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): acl 100%, event-subscriber 100%, bff 100%, domain 98.41% (pre-existing FlowableWorkflowClient baseline, untouched)
- [x] e2e extended: confirmation reference == register reference
- [x] openapi.json + api-client regenerated (drift guard green)
- [x] ADR-0012 added; demo-script note appended
- [x] `Acl__BaseUrl` wired for the subscriber in compose

closes #78

Reviewed-on: #79
2026-07-14 14:01:49 +00:00
1c185e6686 S-09b: Approval flow — temp admin endpoint + status transition to projection (#77)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m25s
CI / build (push) Successful in 1m13s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m26s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m35s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 6m6s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 7m34s
## What & why

S-09b (#75, split from #10) — the **approval flow** that completes the walking skeleton. A behandelaar can now approve a submitted registration; the entry flips from `INGEDIEND` to `INGESCHREVEN` in the public register. Flow: `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW `/statussen`) → OpenZaak → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar.

## Changes (bottom-up, each red→green TDD)

- **Domain** — `RegistrationStatus.Ingeschreven` + `Registration.Approve()` (guards: opened zaak, only from INGEDIEND); `ApproveRegistration` use case (idempotent) + temp `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` endpoint; `IAclClient.ApproveZaakAsync`.
- **ACL** — resolves the zaaktype's **eindstatus** from the catalogus (`isEindstatus` / highest volgnummer) and POSTs a ZGW status; exposed as `POST /statussen`. Unit + real-OpenZaak integration test.
- **Event-subscriber** — binds NRC `hoofdObject`, projects a `status`/`create` as `INGESCHREVEN` keyed on the zaak (updates the existing row), **without reading OpenZaak** (§8.1). Retains the ZGW `resource` in the log (new column + EF migration) so a rebuild reproduces the status.
- **e2e** — extended: submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN.
- **Docs** — ADR-0011 (the two non-obvious decisions + the walking-skeleton assumption) + demo note.

## Key decisions (see ADR-0011)

- **ACL discovers the eindstatus** (chosen over injecting a statustype URL): no new config/seed plumbing, domain stays ZGW-ignorant.
- **Any post-creation status-set ⇒ INGESCHREVEN**: in the walking skeleton the only status ever set after creation is the approval, and the subscriber may not read ZGW — documented to tighten when more transitions arrive (S-12+).

## Verification

- All .NET unit suites green locally (domain 47, acl 11, event-subscriber 14, bff 16, acceptance 7); Release build + `dotnet format` clean.
- No new compose config (the eindstatus-discovery approach avoided it).
- The real-OpenZaak integration test (ACL status-set) and the full submit→approve→visible e2e run in CI `verify-stack` (live NRC→projection + selectielijst egress, not reproducible locally).

closes #75

Reviewed-on: #77
2026-07-14 09:04:57 +00:00
bc9831c113 S-09: Openbaar Register portal — public lookup (#76)
All checks were successful
CI / lint (push) Successful in 1m9s
CI / build (push) Successful in 53s
CI / unit (push) Successful in 1m4s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 1m57s
CI / mutation (push) Successful in 5m19s
CI / verify-stack (push) Successful in 6m31s
Anonymous openbaar portal completing the walking skeleton (submit → projection → public visibility).

closes #10
2026-07-13 14:35:34 +00:00
39923e0e68 fix(e2e): treat the http portal origin as secure so DigiD PKCE login works (refs #68)
Some checks failed
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 53s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 1m47s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 4m2s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Failing after 7m51s
The walking-skeleton e2e timed out waiting for the Keycloak login form
(`#username`). Root cause: in the compose network the portal is served over
plain HTTP on a non-localhost origin (http://self-service), which is not a
secure context, so Web Crypto (`crypto.subtle`) is undefined. angular-auth-
oidc-client needs SubtleCrypto to build the PKCE code challenge, so
`authorize()` threw ("Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'digest')")
and the login redirect never fired.

Production serves the portal over HTTPS, where this works. Instead of
terminating TLS in the throwaway e2e stack, tell Chromium to treat the origin
as secure via --unsafely-treat-insecure-origin-as-secure. The flag is only
honoured by the full Chromium build (new headless), not Playwright's default
headless-shell, so pin channel: 'chromium'.

Verified against a minimal in-network stack (keycloak + self-service): login
redirect now reaches the Keycloak form, and the full login → token exchange →
authenticated portal renders with no console errors.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-13 13:37:31 +02:00
490e7347b0 test(e2e): walking-skeleton Playwright happy path + verify-e2e lane (refs #68)
tests/e2e Playwright spec drives DigiD login (jan-burger/test123) → submit →
confirmation against the compose-served portal. run-e2e-check.sh runs it inside the
compose network (node container, browser installed at runtime) so the token issuer
(keycloak:8080) matches the BFF authority (ADR-0010). Wired as verify-e2e (Makefile +
verify chain + a verify-stack CI step).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 14:08:10 +02:00
5d32d4f15e test(bff): acceptance scenario for BFF access (valid/invalid tokens) (refs #8)
Use-case-level BDD (Reqnroll) driving the real BFF over HTTP with fake downstreams
and locally-minted tokens: a valid DigiD token is accepted and the bsn forwarded
to the domain; a tokenless submit is 401; the openbaar register is anonymous and
never exposes the bsn (ADR-0010). Real Keycloak validation is the verify-bff check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-01 11:03:37 +02:00
79dcd8f14b test(domain): acceptance scenario for submitting a registration (refs #6)
Use-case-level BDD (Reqnroll) for S-05: a zorgprofessional submits a registration;
the Domain Service starts the registratie process and the OpenZaakAanmaken external
task opens a zaak via the ACL, recorded on the aggregate (ADR-0009). Driven against
in-memory Workflow Client and ACL stand-ins; real Flowable+ACL+OpenZaak delivery is
the live-stack verify-domain check.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 17:15:23 +02:00
c70840e5b7 test(event-subscriber): project zaak-created notifications into the read projection (refs #7)
Failing unit + acceptance tests for the Event Subscriber's NotificationProjector:
a zaken/zaak/create notification yields one INGEDIEND projection row, duplicate
deliveries collapse to one row, non-zaak/non-create notifications are ignored, and
a rebuild repopulates the projection from the durable notification log (PRD §8.4).

The projector is a no-op stub so the tests compile and fail on the assertions; the
implementation follows in the green commit. The notification log doubles as the
idempotency guard and rebuild source so a rebuild needs no OpenZaak access (§8.1).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-30 14:47:16 +02:00
28041228bd test(acl): BDD acceptance scenario for opening a zaak (closes #5) (#49)
Some checks failed
CI / lint (push) Has been cancelled
CI / build (push) Has been cancelled
CI / unit (push) Has been cancelled
CI / compose-smoke (push) Has been cancelled
2026-06-08 11:25:26 +00:00