11 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
not	94742a261f	feat: read projection sourced from the register in Objecten (closes #153) (#155) ... ## What & why S-19b-2, closing out ADR-0028's stated direction: **the read projection is now derived from the `RegisterRecord` in Objecten, not from ZGW zaak events.** Until now the subscriber listened on `zaken` and *inferred* register state from case events — a `zaak/create` meant INGEDIEND, and any `status/create` was assumed to be the approval (it may not read OpenZaak, so it could not tell statustypen apart). The reference wasn't in the notification at all, so every projection made a second hop to the ACL. The register — a fact about a person — was being reconstructed by guessing at the lifecycle of the case that produced it. - The subscriber's abonnement moves to the `objecten` kanaal (S-19b-1 made it publish). - An Objecten notification carries **no record data**, only the object URL, so the record is read back through the ACL (`POST /register-records/read`) — §8.1 applies to Objecten exactly as ADR-0028 established. - The record carries `id`, `status` and `reference`, so the row *is* the record: `IsZaakCreated`, `IsZaakStatusSet`, `ZaakUrl`, `ZaakId` and `ToEntry`'s `Resource == "status"` inference are all gone, and so is the ACL enrichment hop. - **The ACL now writes an INGEDIEND record on submit.** Without it, re-sourcing would silently drop every submitted registration from the public register, since only approval wrote a record. - `processed_notifications` holds the projected row (`register_id`, `status`, `reference`) instead of the ZGW event, so a rebuild is a replay with no mapping rules and no upstream reads at all. **ADR-0030** records it. ADR-0028's open caveat — record written but not yet read, "the two must agree" — is closed: there is one source now. Closes #153 ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (above). - [x] Failing tests committed before the implementation — two red/green pairs, ACL side (06c0444 → 566ef7d) and subscriber side (142ed45 → 8af09b2). - [x] Refactor commit follows (b496ac9). - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #153`). - [x] CI green — all six jobs on b30fa66, `verify-stack` end to end including the e2e. - [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (`verify-stack`'s bring-up step — see the wait-healthy fix below). - [x] Docs updated — ADR-0030 added, ADR-0028's consequence + caveat annotated, BACKLOG.md, e2e header comment. - [x] ADR added in `docs/architecture/`. - [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md` — n/a: no user-visible change. The openbaar register shows the same two statuses for the same registrations; only where they come from changed. ## Notes for reviewers **The decision I'd most like a second opinion on** is the one the issue didn't settle: what happens to INGEDIEND. Objecten held only INGESCHREVEN records, so re-sourcing forced a choice between (a) the ACL also writing on submit, (b) a public register that lists only actual registrations, or (c) a hybrid keeping both kanalen. I took (a): visible behaviour is unchanged and the register holds the whole lifecycle. (b) is arguably the better *semantics* for a public register but narrows what the portal shows and reads against PRD §68 ("~50 register entries with diverse statuses"); (c) leaves the projection half-derived from ZGW, which is the coupling ADR-0028 set out to remove. All three are laid out in ADR-0030. **The dedup key is the projected row**, `objecten:object:{url}:{status}:{reference}` — not the object URL (the ACL upserts *one object per registration*, so submit and approval notify about the same URL and the approval would be swallowed as a duplicate) and not URL+actie (a retried approval is a second `update`). Redeliveries collapse, genuine state changes don't. §8.6. **The migration drops columns rather than renaming them.** EF scaffolded renames — `resource` → `register_id`, `zaak_id` → `status` — which would have carried ZGW values into columns meaning something else, and a rebuild would then have projected that garbage. It also empties both tables: a pre-slice row describes a zaak event the new projector can't reproject, and those registrations have no RegisterRecord in Objecten either, so they're not re-derivable from the new source. Stated as a ceiling in the ADR — fine while stacks are ephemeral, backfill from Objecten if a long-lived environment ever needs it. **`run-projection-check.sh` now opens its zaak through the ACL** instead of straight against OpenZaak, because the ACL is what writes the record. A zaak created behind the ACL's back produces no projection row — that's the re-source working, not a gap. ## Three fixes CI found, none of them in the projection logic 1. **`wait-healthy.sh` matched the wrong container** (744f91a). Bring-up timed out with `TIMEOUT: 'objecten' not healthy (status=none)` while the `docker ps` it dumps showed objecten `Up 9 minutes (healthy)`. `--filter name=` is a substring match, so `objecten` also matches `objecten-db`/`objecten-redis`/`objecten-celery`, and `head -1` took whichever docker listed first — the celery worker has no healthcheck, hence `status=none`. Latent since those services landed and decided purely by listing order; `objecttypen` matches `objecttypen-db` the same way. Anchored on the compose replica suffix, which the verify scripts already do. 2. **The ACL had to be repointed at OpenZaak's IP** (7e0897a). Opening the zaak through the ACL put this check in the same bind run-domain-check.sh already handles: `400 {"name":"zaaktype","code":"bad-url","reason":"Voer een geldige URL in."}`. OpenZaak reflects the request Host into the zaaktype URL and then rejects it on zaak-create when single-label — the mechanism compose already documents on `ACL_OPENZAAK_BASEURL`. 3. **Approval arrives as `partial_update`, not `update`** (0dd26a7 → b30fa66) — the one real bug in the slice. The ACL upserts with PATCH; DRF routes it through the notifying `update()` but names the action `partial_update`, so the projector dropped every approval. Only the e2e could catch it: `verify-projection` drives a submit, and per ADR-0028 the e2e is the only check that drives a *real* approval. `verify-tracing` also failed once (run 722) on a path this PR doesn't touch, and passed on a plain re-run of the same commit. Tempo logged `pusher failed to consume trace data` / `distributor_pool failing healthcheck` — it dropped spans under runner load rather than the trace chain being broken. Filed as **#156** rather than absorbed here. **Correction to the #152 PR notes:** I wrote there that celery concurrency was "the next knob" if verify-stack got tight. It isn't — `CELERY_WORKER_CONCURRENCY` already defaults to 1 in the Maykin image, so `objecten-celery` is already a single-process worker. Noted in #156. **Possible follow-up, deliberately not done here:** an `openzaak.local` network alias mirroring `objecten.local` would remove the ACL-repoint dance from both run-domain-check.sh and run-projection-check.sh. It changes the host in every zaak URL the system produces, which is too broad a ripple to land inside an unrelated slice — worth its own issue. **Known costs, all in the ADR:** submission is now two writes across two modules and eventually consistent (same posture ADR-0028 accepted for approval); projecting now depends on the ACL being reachable on the main path, not just for enrichment (NRC retries, so it converges); and OpenZaak still publishes to `zaken` with nothing in the product listening — kept because `verify-nrc` asserts that path.Reviewed-on: #155	2026-09-01 07:26:33 +00:00
not	0cd70ae8c3	S-19a · ACL writes the RegisterRecord to Objecten on approval (closes #149) (#151) ... Closes #149. **Outcome:** approving a registration now writes the canonical register record to the **Objecten** API as a `RegisterRecord` object, alongside the ZGW eindstatus. OpenZaak holds the process, Objecten holds the register (ADR-0028). The write goes through the ACL (§8.1) and is idempotent on the zaak id, so a replayed approval updates the existing object rather than creating a second one. S-19 (#20) was split first (CLAUDE.md §13) — it bundled this with re-sourcing the read projection, which is now #150. ### What landed - `IRegisterRecordGateway` + `RegisterRecord` in `Acl.Application`; `ObjectenGateway` in `Acl.Infrastructure` (static Token auth, CRS headers, objecttype resolved by name to its highest **published** version). - `AclService.ApproveZaakAsync` writes the record after the eindstatus, keyed on the zaak UUID with the zaak's identificatie as reference. - Compose wiring for both stacks; `ADR-0028`; demo note; PRD §15 out-of-scope line retired. ### Three things only a live stack found Running the gateway against a real Objecten + Objecttypen pair while writing this turned up blockers CI would have hit after the fact: 1. **Objecten rejects an objecttype it has not been configured with**, by UUID — assigned at seed time by a one-shot that runs *after* Objecten's static setup_configuration. The UUID is now pinned on both sides. 2. **Objecten 500s on every write when its Notificaties config is absent** (`notifications_api_common` raises rather than skipping). Objecten → NRC has no broker, worker, kanaal or abonnement, so notifications are **disabled** rather than wired to drop every message; #150 turns them on for real. 3. **Objecttypen echoes the request Host into the objecttype `url`**, and Objecten only accepts the one matching its configured `api_root` — so the ACL must read Objecttypen at `http://objecttypen:8000`. This is why the new integration test only passes inside the compose network. All three are recorded in ADR-0028. ### Verification - `ObjectenGatewayIntegrationTests` (verify-acl, in-network): two writes for one id leave exactly one object with the second write's status. **Passing locally against live Objecten.** - The **Playwright happy path** asserts, after the behandelaar approves, that Objecten holds exactly one `RegisterRecord` for *that* reference — missing, duplicated, or non-public-safe all fail. - ACL mutation score **92.23%** (baseline 91.37%, break 90). - `make lint` / `make unit` green locally; full-stack `make verify` runs in CI. ## Definition of Done - [x] A linked Gitea issue exists (#149). - [x] Failing test written and committed first. - [x] Implementation makes the test pass. - [x] Refactor commit follows if structure improved. - [x] Conventional Commit messages referencing the issue (`refs #149`). - [x] All Gitea Actions CI jobs green (run 684). - [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (verify-stack step 1). - [x] Docs touched — ADR-0028, demo note, PRD §15, BACKLOG. - [x] ADR added: `docs/architecture/adr-0028-objecten-holds-the-register.md`. - [x] Demo note appended to `docs/demo-script.md`. - [x] Closed by the merging PR (`closes #149`). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)Reviewed-on: #151	2026-08-14 09:34:04 +00:00
not	0494730223	feat(portal-beheer): ACL default-fill configuration editor (closes #131) (#138) ... ## What & why S-15b, second of the S-15 (#16) split, on top of S-15a (#133). A beheerder edits the ACL's ZGW **default-fill** values from the beheer portal, and the next zaak is stamped with the new values — no restart. Closes #131 ### The vertical portal → BFF `GET/PUT /beheer/default-fill` (medewerker realm + `beheerder` role) → ACL `GET/PUT /default-fill` → a runtime-mutable in-memory store the ACL reads **per zaak**. - **ACL**: `IDefaultFillStore` / `InMemoryDefaultFillStore` (thread-safe, seeded from `Acl:Defaults`); `AclService` reads `fill.Current` per zaak (not cached at construction); `GET`/`PUT /default-fill` with required-field validation. - **BFF**: `IAclClient` gains `GetDefaultFillAsync`/`UpdateDefaultFillAsync`; `GET`/`PUT /beheer/default-fill` behind the `beheerder` policy. OpenAPI + generated client regenerated. - **Frontend**: a *Default-fill* editor page in the beheer app (load → edit → save, with saved/failure states) + nav between Catalogus and Default-fill. ### Scope decision → ADR-0026 Only the **three ZGW fill fields** (bronorganisatie, verantwoordelijke organisatie, vertrouwelijkheidaanduiding) are editable. The S-27 catalog-resolution keys stay **static config** — editing them would desync the zaaktype-URL cache (ADR-0021), and they're catalogus wiring, not "default fill". The store is **in-memory** (seeded from config): an edit reverts on restart. That's the reference-app-appropriate ceiling (no DB added to the stateless ACL); upgrade path documented. Recorded in **ADR-0026**. ## Verified locally lint (`dotnet format`) ✓ · .NET unit — acl 60 / bff 45 / domain 152 / event-subscriber 19 / acceptance 17 ✓ · frontend lint+test (8 projects) ✓ · beheer build ✓. Clean full-solution build (caught + fixed the acceptance `AclService` ctor drift). TDD red→green per layer (ACL store, ACL endpoints, BFF, frontend). ## Definition of Done - [x] Failing test committed before each implementation (red→green per layer). - [x] Conventional Commits referencing #131. - [ ] CI green — see note below. - [x] Docs: ADR-0026 + S-15b demo note. - [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`. ## Note on CI The bulk validates in the fast jobs (lint/build/unit/frontend/mutation). The **verify-stack e2e** (incl. the new `default-fill.spec.ts`) can't go green until the pre-existing **verify-stack bring-up failure on the 1.27/2.0.0 runner** is resolved (that fails on plain `main` too — unrelated to this PR). Additive change; no existing e2e touched. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)Reviewed-on: #138	2026-07-24 14:22:22 +00:00
not	4698c869f3	feat(portal-beheer): beheer portal + read-only catalogus viewer (closes #130) (#133) ... ## What & why S-15a, the first of the S-15 (#16) split. A new **beheer** portal (medewerker realm, like behandel) shows the ZTC catalogus — the published zaaktypen — **read-only**. A beheerder logs in and sees the seeded BIG-REGISTRATIE zaaktype. Closes #130 ### The vertical portal → BFF `GET /beheer/catalogi/zaaktypen` (medewerker realm + `beheerder` role) → ACL `GET /catalogi/zaaktypen` → ZGW Catalogi API. - **ACL**: new read-only `GET /catalogi/zaaktypen` listing published zaaktypen (reuses the ADR-0021 Catalogi client; public-safe `identificatie`/`omschrijving`). - **BFF**: new typed `IAclClient` + `Downstream:Acl:BaseUrl`, and `GET /beheer/catalogi/zaaktypen` behind a new `beheerder` policy (reuses the medewerker bearer scheme + realm-role lifting). OpenAPI spec + generated Angular client regenerated. - **Keycloak**: `beheerder` realm role + `bram-beheerder` test user in the medewerker realm. - **Frontend**: new `apps/beheer` Angular app (copied from behandel) with a read-only catalogus page; `SECURE_API_ROUTES=['/beheer/']`. - **Infra**: `beheer` compose service (port 8143), added to `WAIT_SVCS` + CI log-dump; a Playwright e2e (beheerder login → catalogus shows BIG-REGISTRATIE). ### New boundary → ADR-0025 The BFF now reaches the **ACL directly** for the catalogus read — a new service-to-service edge (§14). The catalogus is neither a domain nor a projection concern, and §8.1 means only the ACL may read ZGW; routing through the domain would pollute it with a non-domain passthrough. §8.1/§8.3 stay intact. Recorded in **ADR-0025**. ## Definition of Done - [x] Failing test committed before each implementation (red→green per layer: ACL, BFF, frontend). - [x] Conventional Commits referencing #130. - [ ] CI green — pending Gitea Actions run. - [x] `docker compose up` brings up `beheer` (health-gated in `WAIT_SVCS`). - [x] Docs — ADR-0025 + demo-script S-15a note. - [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`. ## Verified locally lint (`dotnet format`) ✓ · .NET unit (Acl 57 / Big 152 / EventSubscriber 19 / Bff 40) ✓ · frontend lint+test (8 projects) ✓ · frontend build (4 apps) ✓. Mutation ratchet: added a gateway unit test for the new `ListZaaktypenAsync` mapping so the ACL score holds. verify-stack (compose smoke + e2e) runs in CI. ## Notes for reviewers - The BFF drops the ZGW URL from `BeheerZaaktype` (public-safe: identificatie + omschrijving only). - The catalogus e2e asserts on the stable seeded `BIG-REGISTRATIE` (not a per-test reference), safe on the shared verify stack. - Follow-ups: **S-15b** (#131) default-fill CRUD, **S-15c** (#132) medewerker-realm MFA. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)Reviewed-on: #133	2026-07-24 11:08:17 +00:00
not	5de8c1e292	feat(acl): resolve the zaaktype by identificatie, not a pinned URL (S-27, closes #113) (#118) ... ## What & why The ACL was handed a **pinned zaaktype URL** (`Acl__Defaults__ZaaktypeUrl`) + informatieobjecttype URL. OpenZaak assigns those UUIDs at creation, so every stack had to seed the catalogus and then capture + inject the resulting URLs out of band (CI's `run-domain-check.sh`; the local `local-seed`→`acl.env` bootstrap from ADR-0020). Brittle, and a stale/placeholder URL failed opaquely (OpenZaak 400). Now **the ACL resolves them itself** from OpenZaak's Catalogi API by stable business key: - config `ZaaktypeIdentificatie` (`BIG-REGISTRATIE`) / `InformatieobjecttypeOmschrijving` (`Diploma`); - a `CachedZaaktypeCatalog` resolves **lazily on first use** and caches (success only, so a pre-publish miss is retried — no startup ordering coupling); - a clear "No published … found" error replaces the opaque placeholder 400. Design in **ADR-0021** (proposed in #117). Closes #113 Closes #117 ## Consequences (the payoff) No stack captures/injects a server-assigned URL any more — `docker-compose.yml`/`.local.yml`, `run-domain-check.sh` and `local-seed` all drop it; the local `acl.env` shrinks to a single line. **One thing S-27 can't remove** (confirmed empirically during this work): OpenZaak validates the `zaaktype` field on zaak-create with Django's URLValidator and **rejects a single-label host** (`http://openzaak:8000/…` → `zaaktype: bad-url`). So the ACL's **base URL** must still point at a URL-valid host (a container IP); that base-URL injection from ADR-0020 stays (local `acl.env` now carries only it; CI keeps `ACL_OPENZAAK_BASEURL`). ADR-0021 records this. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked issues (#113 slice, #117 adr-proposal). - [x] TDD — resolver + gateway-lookup unit tests, updated `AclService` tests (50 unit tests green). - [x] Implementation makes them pass; refactor of both compose stacks + verify scripts follows. - [x] Conventional Commits referencing #113. - [ ] CI green — see below. - [x] `docker compose up` reaches green health — verified: fresh `make local` + `make verify-local` green with **no zaaktype-URL injection**; `acl.env` is base-URL-only. - [x] Docs — ADR-0021 + demo-script S-27 note. - [x] ADR added (ADR-0021). - [x] Demo note appended. ## Verification done locally - **50 unit tests** pass (resolver resolve/cache/retry-on-failure; gateway match/miss/blank-key; all `AclService` paths). - **6 ACL integration tests** pass against a live seeded OpenZaak — incl. resolving the zaaktype + Diploma iot by business key, and a clear error for an unknown identificatie. - **Fresh `make local` + `make verify-local`**: full flow (submit → werkbak → openbaar) green; `acl.env` = `Acl__OpenZaak__BaseUrl` only. - `make lint` clean; ACL mutation ratchet run locally (see checks). ## Notes for reviewers - `IZaakGateway` gains two resolve methods; `AclService` depends on the new `IZaaktypeCatalog` (singleton, so the cache persists). - Supersedes the pinned-URL mechanism; ADR-0021 documents that ADR-0020's `seed-env`/entrypoint shim are **simplified** (base-URL only), not deleted, because of the URLValidator constraint above. Reviewed-on: #118	2026-07-22 14:49:25 +00:00
not	c8fdfbb699	feat(acl,domain): cancel the ZGW zaak on document-timeout expiry (S-10c, closes #106) (#109) ... ## S-10c · Close the ZGW zaak on document-timeout expiry (closes #106) Completes the S-10a/S-10b boundary flagged in ADR-0017: when a registration's 30-day document term lapses, the domain now cancels the **ZGW zaak** as well as marking the aggregate `Verlopen`, so OpenZaak and the register no longer diverge. ### What it does On expiry the `ExpireRegistrationWorker` calls the ACL to set the zaak to a distinct, non-terminal **`Geannuleerd`** status with a **`Vervallen`** resultaat (vs the approval `Afgehandeld` + `Geregistreerd`), resolved **by omschrijving** in the ACL — the ACL-first ordering mirrors approval so a failed ZGW call leaves the job for redelivery rather than diverging the two. **Path:** Flowable P30D timer → `RegistratieVerlopen` job → domain `ExpireRegistrationWorker` → ACL `POST /annuleringen` → ZGW `resultaten` + `statussen` (Geannuleerd) → aggregate `Verlopen`. ### Layers touched (each red→green) - **ACL gateway** — `SetZaakToCancellationStatusAsync` (Geannuleerd + Vervallen by name); approval now resolves its `Geregistreerd` resultaat by name too (a second resultaattype now exists). - **ACL service/API** — `AclService.CancelZaakAsync` + `POST /annuleringen`. - **Domain** — `IAclClient.CancelZaakAsync` + client; expiry worker cancels the zaak before advancing to `Verlopen`, guarded against redelivery double-cancel. - **Seed** — non-terminal `Geannuleerd` statustype (volgnummer 2; `Afgehandeld` → 3) + `Vervallen` resultaattype, both idempotent by omschrijving and sharing the zaaktype's procestype. - **Verify/integration** — ACL↔OpenZaak integration test (live `Geannuleerd` + resultaat); `run-domain-check.sh` fires the real P30D timer and asserts the zaak reaches `Geannuleerd` end-to-end; BDD scenario asserts cancel-on-timeout vs untouched-when-in-time. - **Docs** — ADR-0019 (cancellation modelling decision), demo-script, BACKLOG. ### Design note (ADR-0019) ZGW allows only one eindstatus per zaaktype, so `Geannuleerd` is modelled as a **non-terminal** status (it records a cancellation status + resultaat but does not set `einddatum`). This follows the issue's explicit "distinct statustype + resultaat" outcome; the shared-eindstatus alternative is recorded in the ADR. ### Tests Unit + acceptance all green locally (Acl 38, Big 134, Acceptance 17, Bff 33, EventSubscriber 19). Integration + verify-stack run in CI (need live OpenZaak + selectielijst egress). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Reviewed-on: #109	2026-07-21 13:58:15 +00:00
not	0904df8db0	feat(acl): diploma upload stored in the ZGW Documenten API (S-10b, closes #103) (#108) ... ## What & why S-10b: the self-service **diploma upload** is now real. After submitting, the citizen picks a PDF and uploads it; the portal base64-encodes it client-side → BFF → domain → **ACL**, which stores it in the ZGW **Documenten (DRC) API** as an `enkelvoudiginformatieobject` and relates it to the zaak, then the `WachtOpDocumenten` wait completes and the case advances to beoordeling. Per §8.1 only the ACL talks to ZGW. Closes #103 Mechanism in **ADR-0018** (proposal #107). Builds on S-10a (#102). The zaak-close-on-expiry item is carved to **#106 (S-10c)**. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (above). - [x] Failing test committed before the implementation (red→green per layer). - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #103`). - [ ] CI green — all Gitea Actions jobs (pending on this PR). - [x] `docker compose up` health unaffected (ACL boots on a placeholder informatieobjecttype URL; the real one is injected by verify-domain). - [x] Docs updated (ADR-0018, demo-script, BACKLOG + S-10c). - [x] ADR added (`docs/architecture/adr-0018-diploma-upload-via-acl-documenten.md`). - [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`. ## Notes for reviewers - **ACL** (`OpenZaakGateway.StoreDocumentAsync` + `AclService.StoreDiplomaAsync` + `POST /documenten`) reuses the existing gateway patterns (ZGW Bearer, buffered non-chunked body, **no CRS** — Documenten isn't geo). Unit-tested via the stub handler; an **integration test** stores a real document against live OpenZaak (verify-acl). - **Transport:** base64 JSON on every hop (portal encodes client-side) — I deviated from proposal #107's multipart to keep one contract shape and avoid `IFormFile`/antiforgery/multipart-client plumbing; fine at diploma size (ADR-0018 §Alternatives). - **Infra:** `seed_catalogus.py` seeds + publishes a "Diploma" `informatieobjecttype` and relates it to the zaaktype (while both concept); `verify-domain` injects its URL into the ACL. No new ZGW scopes (seed applicatie has `heeft_alle_autorisaties`). - **e2e:** uploads a real PDF (`setInputFiles`) after the openbaar INGEDIEND row confirms the zaak is open (so storage doesn't race the OpenZaak worker). - **Scope boundary:** the ZGW zaak is not set to a cancellation status on 30-day expiry — that's #106 (S-10c). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Reviewed-on: #108	2026-07-21 12:15:33 +00:00
not	9997da8beb	feat(#78): one citizen reference across self-service and the openbaar register (#79) ... ## What & why Before this change the self-service confirmation and the openbaar register showed **different** identifiers, so a citizen could not look their registration back up (#78). Now both surface the same **reference**: - **domain → ACL (write):** the domain `registrationId` is set as the zaak's `identificatie` on `POST /zaken`. - **event-subscriber → ACL (read):** the subscriber reads the zaak's `identificatie` back through the ACL (§8.1 — only the ACL talks to ZGW) via a new `POST /zaken/reference`, and stores it on the projection row **and** the `processed_notifications` replay log. - **BFF + openbaar:** the public view exposes `id/status/reference` (never bsn/naam) and searches by id or reference; the register's "Referentie" column shows the reference. Storing the reference in the replay log keeps ADR-0008's **rebuild-is-log-only** invariant intact — `/admin/rebuild` reproduces the reference without re-reading the ACL. Decision recorded in **ADR-0012**. ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked issue: #78 - [x] Tests written first; red → green per layer - [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 49, acl 27, bff 20, event-subscriber 19, acceptance 7 - [x] Frontend lint + test green (`nx run-many -t lint test`) - [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): acl 100%, event-subscriber 100%, bff 100%, domain 98.41% (pre-existing FlowableWorkflowClient baseline, untouched) - [x] e2e extended: confirmation reference == register reference - [x] openapi.json + api-client regenerated (drift guard green) - [x] ADR-0012 added; demo-script note appended - [x] `Acl__BaseUrl` wired for the subscriber in compose closes #78 Reviewed-on: #79	2026-07-14 14:01:49 +00:00
not	1c185e6686	S-09b: Approval flow — temp admin endpoint + status transition to projection (#77) ... ## What & why S-09b (#75, split from #10) — the **approval flow** that completes the walking skeleton. A behandelaar can now approve a submitted registration; the entry flips from `INGEDIEND` to `INGESCHREVEN` in the public register. Flow: `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW `/statussen`) → OpenZaak → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar. ## Changes (bottom-up, each red→green TDD) - **Domain** — `RegistrationStatus.Ingeschreven` + `Registration.Approve()` (guards: opened zaak, only from INGEDIEND); `ApproveRegistration` use case (idempotent) + temp `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` endpoint; `IAclClient.ApproveZaakAsync`. - **ACL** — resolves the zaaktype's **eindstatus** from the catalogus (`isEindstatus` / highest volgnummer) and POSTs a ZGW status; exposed as `POST /statussen`. Unit + real-OpenZaak integration test. - **Event-subscriber** — binds NRC `hoofdObject`, projects a `status`/`create` as `INGESCHREVEN` keyed on the zaak (updates the existing row), **without reading OpenZaak** (§8.1). Retains the ZGW `resource` in the log (new column + EF migration) so a rebuild reproduces the status. - **e2e** — extended: submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN. - **Docs** — ADR-0011 (the two non-obvious decisions + the walking-skeleton assumption) + demo note. ## Key decisions (see ADR-0011) - **ACL discovers the eindstatus** (chosen over injecting a statustype URL): no new config/seed plumbing, domain stays ZGW-ignorant. - **Any post-creation status-set ⇒ INGESCHREVEN**: in the walking skeleton the only status ever set after creation is the approval, and the subscriber may not read ZGW — documented to tighten when more transitions arrive (S-12+). ## Verification - All .NET unit suites green locally (domain 47, acl 11, event-subscriber 14, bff 16, acceptance 7); Release build + `dotnet format` clean. - No new compose config (the eindstatus-discovery approach avoided it). - The real-OpenZaak integration test (ACL status-set) and the full submit→approve→visible e2e run in CI `verify-stack` (live NRC→projection + selectielijst egress, not reproducible locally). closes #75 Reviewed-on: #77	2026-07-14 09:04:57 +00:00
notandClaude Opus 4.8	10816f5303	test(acl): kill surviving mutants — assert CRS headers, guards, error paths, JWT claims (refs #47) ... Stryker exposed thin ACL tests (35% mutation score): the suite never asserted the geo CRS headers, the ArgumentNullException guards, the non-success and empty-body error paths, or the structure of the minted ZGW JWT — so mutating any of those survived. Strengthen the unit tests to kill those mutants: - assert Accept-Crs / Content-Crs are EPSG:4326, - assert OpenZaakAsync rejects a null request/registration without calling out, - assert a non-2xx response throws and an empty body throws InvalidOperationException, - decode the Bearer token and assert the HS256 header + acl identity claims. Raises the ACL mutation score to 95%. The one remaining survivor mutates only the exception *message* text (an equivalent mutant — message strings are not worth a brittle assertion). Refs #47. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-25 14:57:51 +02:00
eho	4b2af5c635	feat(acl): ACL skeleton — OpenZaak default-fill (refs #5) (#45)	2026-06-04 07:50:45 +00:00