HandleAsync reads the record at the notification's object URL through the ACL and writes it
to the projection verbatim — the record already carries id, status and reference, so there
is no mapping and no enrichment hop.
The dedup key is the object plus the state that write projects. It cannot be the object URL
alone (the ACL upserts one object per registration, so submit and approval notify about the
same URL and the approval would be swallowed), nor include the actie (a retried approval is
a second `update`). Keying on the projected row collapses redeliveries and lets genuine
state changes through — §8.6.
Ports, schema and failing tests for the subscriber half of S-19b-2, ahead of the
implementation.
The subscriber now listens on the `objecten` kanaal instead of `zaken`. An Objecten
notification carries no record data — only the object URL — so the record is read back
through the ACL (§8.1), and the zaak-shaped surface goes away: IsZaakCreated /
IsZaakStatusSet / ZaakUrl / ZaakId and ToEntry's `Resource == "status"` mapping are replaced
by IsRegisterRecordWritten + ObjectUrl.
The notification log now holds the projected row itself (register id, status, reference),
so a rebuild is a replay with no mapping rules and no upstream reads. The migration drops
the old columns rather than renaming them — EF scaffolded renames that would have carried
ZGW values into columns meaning something else — and empties both tables, since a
pre-slice row is neither reprojectable nor re-derivable from the new source.
Red: HandleAsync recognises a register write but does not yet read or project it, so the
seven projection assertions fail on an empty store.
## What & why
Before this change the self-service confirmation and the openbaar register showed **different** identifiers, so a citizen could not look their registration back up (#78). Now both surface the same **reference**:
- **domain → ACL (write):** the domain `registrationId` is set as the zaak's `identificatie` on `POST /zaken`.
- **event-subscriber → ACL (read):** the subscriber reads the zaak's `identificatie` back through the ACL (§8.1 — only the ACL talks to ZGW) via a new `POST /zaken/reference`, and stores it on the projection row **and** the `processed_notifications` replay log.
- **BFF + openbaar:** the public view exposes `id/status/reference` (never bsn/naam) and searches by id or reference; the register's "Referentie" column shows the reference.
Storing the reference in the replay log keeps ADR-0008's **rebuild-is-log-only** invariant intact — `/admin/rebuild` reproduces the reference without re-reading the ACL.
Decision recorded in **ADR-0012**.
## Definition of Done
- [x] Linked issue: #78
- [x] Tests written first; red → green per layer
- [x] Unit + acceptance green (`make unit`): domain 49, acl 27, bff 20, event-subscriber 19, acceptance 7
- [x] Frontend lint + test green (`nx run-many -t lint test`)
- [x] Mutation ≥ break(90): acl 100%, event-subscriber 100%, bff 100%, domain 98.41% (pre-existing FlowableWorkflowClient baseline, untouched)
- [x] e2e extended: confirmation reference == register reference
- [x] openapi.json + api-client regenerated (drift guard green)
- [x] ADR-0012 added; demo-script note appended
- [x] `Acl__BaseUrl` wired for the subscriber in compose
closes#78
Reviewed-on: #79
## What & why
S-09b (#75, split from #10) — the **approval flow** that completes the walking skeleton. A behandelaar can now approve a submitted registration; the entry flips from `INGEDIEND` to `INGESCHREVEN` in the public register. Flow: `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` (domain) → ACL sets the zaak eindstatus (ZGW `/statussen`) → OpenZaak → NRC → event-subscriber → projection → openbaar.
## Changes (bottom-up, each red→green TDD)
- **Domain** — `RegistrationStatus.Ingeschreven` + `Registration.Approve()` (guards: opened zaak, only from INGEDIEND); `ApproveRegistration` use case (idempotent) + temp `POST /registrations/{id}/approve` endpoint; `IAclClient.ApproveZaakAsync`.
- **ACL** — resolves the zaaktype's **eindstatus** from the catalogus (`isEindstatus` / highest volgnummer) and POSTs a ZGW status; exposed as `POST /statussen`. Unit + real-OpenZaak integration test.
- **Event-subscriber** — binds NRC `hoofdObject`, projects a `status`/`create` as `INGESCHREVEN` keyed on the zaak (updates the existing row), **without reading OpenZaak** (§8.1). Retains the ZGW `resource` in the log (new column + EF migration) so a rebuild reproduces the status.
- **e2e** — extended: submit → public INGEDIEND → approve → public INGESCHREVEN.
- **Docs** — ADR-0011 (the two non-obvious decisions + the walking-skeleton assumption) + demo note.
## Key decisions (see ADR-0011)
- **ACL discovers the eindstatus** (chosen over injecting a statustype URL): no new config/seed plumbing, domain stays ZGW-ignorant.
- **Any post-creation status-set ⇒ INGESCHREVEN**: in the walking skeleton the only status ever set after creation is the approval, and the subscriber may not read ZGW — documented to tighten when more transitions arrive (S-12+).
## Verification
- All .NET unit suites green locally (domain 47, acl 11, event-subscriber 14, bff 16, acceptance 7); Release build + `dotnet format` clean.
- No new compose config (the eindstatus-discovery approach avoided it).
- The real-OpenZaak integration test (ACL status-set) and the full submit→approve→visible e2e run in CI `verify-stack` (live NRC→projection + selectielijst egress, not reproducible locally).
closes#75
Reviewed-on: #77
Implement NotificationProjector: a zaken/zaak/create notification records the delivery
in the notification log (atomic record-or-skip for idempotency, §8.6) and upserts an
INGEDIEND projection row keyed by zaak id; other channels/actions are ignored. Rebuild
clears the projection and replays the log — no OpenZaak access needed (§8.1). bsn/naam
are deferred (ADR-0008).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Failing unit + acceptance tests for the Event Subscriber's NotificationProjector:
a zaken/zaak/create notification yields one INGEDIEND projection row, duplicate
deliveries collapse to one row, non-zaak/non-create notifications are ignored, and
a rebuild repopulates the projection from the durable notification log (PRD §8.4).
The projector is a no-op stub so the tests compile and fail on the assertions; the
implementation follows in the green commit. The notification log doubles as the
idempotency guard and rebuild source so a rebuild needs no OpenZaak access (§8.1).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
not
