d07aa2f64f9cbffe0da9e84ad15143fdf8315c6c
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 not
|
0494730223 |
feat(portal-beheer): ACL default-fill configuration editor (closes #131) (#138)
## What & why S-15b, second of the S-15 (#16) split, on top of S-15a (#133). A beheerder edits the ACL's ZGW **default-fill** values from the beheer portal, and the next zaak is stamped with the new values — no restart. Closes #131 ### The vertical portal → BFF `GET/PUT /beheer/default-fill` (medewerker realm + `beheerder` role) → ACL `GET/PUT /default-fill` → a runtime-mutable in-memory store the ACL reads **per zaak**. - **ACL**: `IDefaultFillStore` / `InMemoryDefaultFillStore` (thread-safe, seeded from `Acl:Defaults`); `AclService` reads `fill.Current` per zaak (not cached at construction); `GET`/`PUT /default-fill` with required-field validation. - **BFF**: `IAclClient` gains `GetDefaultFillAsync`/`UpdateDefaultFillAsync`; `GET`/`PUT /beheer/default-fill` behind the `beheerder` policy. OpenAPI + generated client regenerated. - **Frontend**: a *Default-fill* editor page in the beheer app (load → edit → save, with saved/failure states) + nav between Catalogus and Default-fill. ### Scope decision → ADR-0026 Only the **three ZGW fill fields** (bronorganisatie, verantwoordelijke organisatie, vertrouwelijkheidaanduiding) are editable. The S-27 catalog-resolution keys stay **static config** — editing them would desync the zaaktype-URL cache (ADR-0021), and they're catalogus wiring, not "default fill". The store is **in-memory** (seeded from config): an edit reverts on restart. That's the reference-app-appropriate ceiling (no DB added to the stateless ACL); upgrade path documented. Recorded in **ADR-0026**. ## Verified locally lint (`dotnet format`) ✓ · .NET unit — acl 60 / bff 45 / domain 152 / event-subscriber 19 / acceptance 17 ✓ · frontend lint+test (8 projects) ✓ · beheer build ✓. Clean full-solution build (caught + fixed the acceptance `AclService` ctor drift). TDD red→green per layer (ACL store, ACL endpoints, BFF, frontend). ## Definition of Done - [x] Failing test committed before each implementation (red→green per layer). - [x] Conventional Commits referencing #131. - [ ] CI green — see note below. - [x] Docs: ADR-0026 + S-15b demo note. - [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`. ## Note on CI The bulk validates in the fast jobs (lint/build/unit/frontend/mutation). The **verify-stack e2e** (incl. the new `default-fill.spec.ts`) can't go green until the pre-existing **verify-stack bring-up failure on the 1.27/2.0.0 runner** is resolved (that fails on plain `main` too — unrelated to this PR). Additive change; no existing e2e touched. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)Reviewed-on: #138 |
||
|
not
|
fff88ca23d |
ci: richer step reports via Gitea 1.27 job summaries (closes #136) (#137)
## What & why Use the standard `$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY` (Gitea 1.27 + act_runner 2.0.0) to surface on the run page what was previously buried in logs or download-only artifacts. All five quick wins from #136, **reporting-only** — no job's pass/fail gating changes. Closes #136 ### Items 1. **Mutation scores** — added the `markdown` reporter to each `stryker-config.json`; the `mutation` job concatenates each service's `mutation-report.md` into the summary (`if: always()`). Also reveals where `make mutation` stopped on a ratchet break. 2. **Per-frontend tests** — the 4 apps' `test` targets emit vitest JSON to `test-output/{projectName}.json` (Nx token interpolation); `infra/vitest-summary.py` renders a per-frontend table. 3. **Per-service unit tests** — `make unit` now writes TRX; `infra/trx-summary.py` renders a per-service table (service name derived from the `services/<name>/` path, so `domain` shows, not `big.tests`). 4. **e2e per-spec results** — Playwright writes `playwright-report.json`; `run-e2e-check.sh` copies it out of the container (capturing the exit code first); `infra/playwright-summary.py` renders a per-spec table. Turns a red e2e into a one-glance "which spec". 5. **verify-stack check table** — each live-stack check has an `id`; a final `if: always()` step tabulates each check's ✅/❌/⏭️. Docs: `gitea-actions-gotchas.md` §8 (version requirement + `$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY` guard + step-level `always()` note). ### Notes - Every summary write is guarded with `[ -n "${GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY:-}" ]`, so it no-ops on an unsupported runner / locally. - New helper scripts are stdlib-only Python, matching the existing `infra/*.py` check scripts (no new dependency — a few lines of parsing rather than a test-logger package). - `TestResults/` and `test-output/` gitignored. - This is also the first PR-run exercising the #135 verify-stack fix end to end. ## Verified locally `make unit` (TRX) ✓ · 4 apps' vitest JSON ✓ · ACL Stryker markdown report ✓ · all four parsers + the two summary shell blocks ✓ · `ci.yaml` + `run-e2e-check.sh` syntax ✓. The rendered summaries themselves only appear on the run page — this PR's CI run is the end-to-end check. ## Definition of Done - [x] Each item writes to `$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY` (guarded), renders on the run page. - [x] No change to any job's pass/fail gating. - [x] Conventional Commits referencing #136 (one per item + docs). - [ ] CI green; summaries visible on the run. - [x] Runbook note (gotchas §8). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)Reviewed-on: #137 |
||
|
not
|
4698c869f3 |
feat(portal-beheer): beheer portal + read-only catalogus viewer (closes #130) (#133)
## What & why S-15a, the first of the S-15 (#16) split. A new **beheer** portal (medewerker realm, like behandel) shows the ZTC catalogus — the published zaaktypen — **read-only**. A beheerder logs in and sees the seeded BIG-REGISTRATIE zaaktype. Closes #130 ### The vertical portal → BFF `GET /beheer/catalogi/zaaktypen` (medewerker realm + `beheerder` role) → ACL `GET /catalogi/zaaktypen` → ZGW Catalogi API. - **ACL**: new read-only `GET /catalogi/zaaktypen` listing published zaaktypen (reuses the ADR-0021 Catalogi client; public-safe `identificatie`/`omschrijving`). - **BFF**: new typed `IAclClient` + `Downstream:Acl:BaseUrl`, and `GET /beheer/catalogi/zaaktypen` behind a new `beheerder` policy (reuses the medewerker bearer scheme + realm-role lifting). OpenAPI spec + generated Angular client regenerated. - **Keycloak**: `beheerder` realm role + `bram-beheerder` test user in the medewerker realm. - **Frontend**: new `apps/beheer` Angular app (copied from behandel) with a read-only catalogus page; `SECURE_API_ROUTES=['/beheer/']`. - **Infra**: `beheer` compose service (port 8143), added to `WAIT_SVCS` + CI log-dump; a Playwright e2e (beheerder login → catalogus shows BIG-REGISTRATIE). ### New boundary → ADR-0025 The BFF now reaches the **ACL directly** for the catalogus read — a new service-to-service edge (§14). The catalogus is neither a domain nor a projection concern, and §8.1 means only the ACL may read ZGW; routing through the domain would pollute it with a non-domain passthrough. §8.1/§8.3 stay intact. Recorded in **ADR-0025**. ## Definition of Done - [x] Failing test committed before each implementation (red→green per layer: ACL, BFF, frontend). - [x] Conventional Commits referencing #130. - [ ] CI green — pending Gitea Actions run. - [x] `docker compose up` brings up `beheer` (health-gated in `WAIT_SVCS`). - [x] Docs — ADR-0025 + demo-script S-15a note. - [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md`. ## Verified locally lint (`dotnet format`) ✓ · .NET unit (Acl 57 / Big 152 / EventSubscriber 19 / Bff 40) ✓ · frontend lint+test (8 projects) ✓ · frontend build (4 apps) ✓. Mutation ratchet: added a gateway unit test for the new `ListZaaktypenAsync` mapping so the ACL score holds. verify-stack (compose smoke + e2e) runs in CI. ## Notes for reviewers - The BFF drops the ZGW URL from `BeheerZaaktype` (public-safe: identificatie + omschrijving only). - The catalogus e2e asserts on the stable seeded `BIG-REGISTRATIE` (not a per-test reference), safe on the shared verify stack. - Follow-ups: **S-15b** (#131) default-fill CRUD, **S-15c** (#132) medewerker-realm MFA. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)Reviewed-on: #133 |