Commit Graph
78 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ehoandClaude Opus 5 2627799284 fix(backend): 400 instead of 500 on an unparseable peildatum (RB-16)
BIO-019: GET /stamdata/{table}?peildatum= called DateOnly.Parse
directly, which throws FormatException on anything unparseable — an
unhandled 500 (leaking exception detail in Development) instead of
the 400-with-problem-details every other bad-input check in this file
returns. §3c named backend/Stamdata's 71.7% branch coverage (BL-005)
as the weak spot this bug lived in.

Switched to DateOnly.TryParse; an unparseable value now returns
Results.Problem(detail: ..., statusCode: 400), matching the shape the
upload/change-request endpoints already use. Endpoint doc gained
.ProducesProblem(400), so the OpenAPI doc + generated client were
regenerated and committed in this same diff (RB-09's note records a
prior incident where a response-shape change shipped without this and
the drift went unnoticed).

No FE change needed: libs/beheer's stamdata adapter already funnels
every call through runSubmit, which folds any thrown ApiException
(now including this 400) into a generic Result error — ADR-0001's
"the FE renders the decision" already covers "the server rejected
this input".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 16:53:29 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 a93218e8ac fix(backend): gate Swagger + the OpenAPI doc behind IsDevelopment (RB-15)
BIO-015: app.UseSwagger()/app.UseSwaggerUI() ran unconditionally, so
the full OpenAPI document (every route + request/response shape) and
SwaggerUI's interactive "Try it out" were reachable in every
environment, including a real deployment.

Both now run only inside `if (app.Environment.IsDevelopment())`.
AddSwaggerGen/AddEndpointsApiExplorer stay unconditional — DI
registration only, no HTTP surface by itself.

RB-09 already made a non-Development environment throw at startup,
which broke `npm run gen:api` until that script pinned
ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT=Development for its one CLI invocation. This
change sits in the same pipeline, so it was verified rather than
assumed: `dotnet swagger tofile` resolves ISwaggerProvider straight
out of DI and never sends an HTTP request through this middleware, so
gating it can't affect that tool by construction. Ran the real
`npm run gen:api` to confirm — exit 0, regenerated files byte-identical
to what's committed.

New tests exercise the gate on a third ("Staging") environment name,
not Production — Production already can't boot at all post-RB-09, so
a Production-environment test would only re-prove that unrelated
startup throw, not this gate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 16:40:23 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 ee0d449510 test(backend): assert every route is authz-gated (RB-12)
BL-006: the backend has zero automated architecture enforcement.
BIO-016 names the concrete consequence for authorization — nothing
asserted the *set* of gated endpoints, so BIO-003's X-Admin gate
(outside Authz) and BIO-004's two ungated endpoints were caught only
by a human reading Program.cs, not by CI.

Adds RouteInventoryTests: walks the real app's EndpointDataSource and
asserts every mapped route either carries a .Gate("XAdmin") metadata
marker (added at the 16 call sites that already call one of the five
admin wrappers — OrgAdmin/StamdataAdmin/CasesAdmin/Beoordelen/
FlagsAdmin) or appears in a written-down, reasoned allow-list. Proved
it's hard to fool by adding a throwaway unguarded route, watching the
test go red, and reverting.

The allow-list is not "public routes" as the ticket's shorthand put
it — 19 of its 31 entries are ownership-scoped inline (ctx.Zorgverlener()/
ctx.Caller()) endpoints, not public ones, and labelling them public
would misrepresent the exact property BIO-004 was about. Each entry
instead carries its own reason. Implementation note has the full
route-by-route breakdown and judgement calls.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 16:36:30 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 1fad740606 fix(api): regenerate client for RB-08's 403 response shape
RB-08 changed DELETE /admin/uploads/{documentId}'s 403 mapping from
.Produces to .ProducesProblem, matching CasesAdmin's actual
Results.Problem() response - but the generated OpenAPI doc and typed
client were never regenerated alongside it, so CI's api-client-drift
check (npm run gen:api && git diff --exit-code) was left red. No
frontend consumes this admin-only endpoint (confirmed by grep), so
this is a pure regeneration with no consumer impact.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 14:21:26 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 8b8b522052 fix(auth): make no-identity representable; stub dev-only (RB-09)
IIdentityProvider.Resolve returned a non-nullable CallerIdentity, so
the interface could not express "no identity" - StubIdentityProvider
was forced to invent one for any request carrying no credential at
all. Consequence: a production behandelportal build sends no
X-Medewerker header (medewerkerInterceptor is dev-only), so it used
to authenticate as the seeded citizen, role drafter - failing closed
on backoffice capabilities but open on every citizen-scoped endpoint,
including CanRevealBigNummer.

Resolve now returns CallerIdentity?. StubIdentityProvider keeps a
non-nullable return type (a valid narrower override) since it never
itself has "no identity" to report - it is registered only under
IsDevelopment() now. Production registers nothing and throws an
InvalidOperationException immediately during startup instead: there
is no real DigiD/employee-SSO provider in this POC yet, so a
misconfigured Production deploy must fail before serving a single
request, not resolve one per request. The identity-resolution
middleware turns a null resolution into a 401 rather than passing it
downstream.

Added StubIdentityProviderTests.Never_returns_null_even_with_no_headers_at_all
and ProductionIdentityProviderTests, which builds its own
WebApplicationFactory<Program> with UseEnvironment("Production") and
asserts startup throws. Verified both new tests fail red against the
pre-fix code.

RB-01's residual (GET /uploads/{id}/content reached via plain browser
navigation, no identity header) is confirmed unchanged in Development
and its Production consequence is written up in
implementation/rb-09.md for whoever lands the real identity provider -
no signed-URL/cookie scheme was designed here, per scope.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 14:06:49 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 494cee9d08 fix(uploads): route the admin delete through CasesAdmin (RB-08)
DELETE /admin/uploads/{documentId} was gated by a standalone
`X-Admin: true` header check (`IsAdmin`), outside the `Authz` module
entirely and outside the `CasesAdmin`/`StamdataAdmin`/`OrgAdmin`/
`FlagsAdmin` wrappers the four sibling admin surfaces use. It wrote no
AuthzAuditStore row, so a destructive cross-owner document delete never
appeared on /beheer/audit. A repo-wide grep confirmed the only sender of
X-Admin was the backend test itself — no frontend or e2e path depends on
it — so the gate was safe to delete outright.

Routed the endpoint through CasesAdmin (Authz.CanManageCases), the same
wrapper the other admin-cases endpoints use. RB-07 already moved
AuditAuthz onto every *Admin wrapper's allow path, so this gets the
missing audit row for free with no second AuditAuthz call. Deleted the
now-unused IsAdmin function and updated the two comments that referenced
the old X-Admin seam.

Updated EndpointTests.cs's Admin_delete_requires_admin_role to send
X-Role: admin instead of X-Admin: true, and added
AuthzAuditTests.An_admin_upload_delete_is_recorded, which asserts the
cases:manage/allow row count increases by exactly one (a plain
Contains would already be satisfied by this test class's other
cases:manage calls). Verified both tests fail red against the
pre-fix gate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 13:55:41 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 e89525eef6 feat(audit): record the allow path, not just the denial (RB-07)
All five authorization gates audited only their deny branch, so /beheer/audit
could answer "who was turned away" but never "who changed this" — for a
register whose integrity is the product, the wrong half. Nothing recorded the
flag toggle, either org-template write, the admin case or upload delete, the
three brief transitions, or the besluit; the comment claiming endpoints log
their own effect held for two of the eight.

Each gate now computes the decision once, audits it, and then acts. The row
is written by the gate rather than the endpoint, so a new admin endpoint
cannot be added that forgets to audit itself. Same reasoning for the brief:
every transition already funnelled through LogBrief for its log line, so the
audit row goes there too — submit/approve/reject/send in one place, with the
transition's own outcome as the decision, so a 403 or 409 is as visible as a
success.

FlagsAdmin gained a per-call resource, the one deviation from BIO-007's
minimal remediation: the toggle endpoint writes no log line of its own, so a
constant "feature-flags" row would say a flag changed without saying which.
It now records feature-flags/<key>=<value>. OrgAdmin and CasesAdmin keep
coarse refs because those endpoints do log the specific object.

The besluit gets a second row: the gate records that a behandelaar was
allowed to act, aanvraag:besluit records what they decided.

Row volume goes up — StamdataAdmin gates read endpoints, so admin page loads
now write rows. That is what auditing the allow path means; it is also what
would make retention on AuthzAuditStore necessary later.

Closes CQ-004's outstanding half and unblocks signing ADR-C-009.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 13:12:22 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 0298ecc506 fix(uploads): delete the dead POST /registrations (RB-06)
POST /registrations passed its Documents list straight to Submit, which calls
DocumentStore.Link on every digital documentId in it — and linking a document
blocks its owner from ever deleting it (DeleteOwned returns 409 Linked). That
path had no ForeignIds ownership check, so any authenticated citizen could
post another citizen's document id and permanently block them from deleting
their own diploma scan. POST /applications/{id}/submit, the endpoint actually
in use, has had that guard since it was written.

Deleted rather than guarded: the endpoint is dead. No frontend caller, and
the whole registratie flow goes through /applications/{id}/submit.
RegistratieRequest went with it, and so did SubmissionRules.RejectRegistratie
— reachable only from here, and contradicted by the live path, which treats a
handmatig diploma as "does not auto-approve" rather than a 422 rejection. Its
own message said as much while being returned as a rejection. That last part
is a judgement call beyond the ticket's wording; reverting the two
SubmissionRules hunks restores it in isolation.

Coverage moved rather than vanished: the problem+json shape assertion is now
on /change-requests (the other endpoint on the same Submit helper), and the
linked-delete 409 test goes through the real submit path.

swagger.json, the generated client and the behaviour spec regenerated.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 11:04:03 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 5187bfa19a fix(zgw): keep the BSN out of the recorded ZGW failure message (RB-05)
ZgwHttpClient interpolated the full request uri and up to 500 characters of
the response body into its failure message. That message is persisted as
Aanvraag.ZgwError in SQLite and written to the log, and both halves can carry
a BSN: ZGW filters travel as query parameters (the citizen-scoped zaken list
filters on rol__betrokkeneIdentificatie__natuurlijkPersoon__inpBsn), and
OpenZaak echoes the offending request in its error bodies, so a rejected POST
/rollen comes back holding the owner BSN it was sent.

All three interpolation sites now use Redact(url) — the path without its
query — and the body snippet is replaced by the reason phrase. Status plus
path still routes a failure to the right endpoint; the lost detail already
has a deliberate home in ZGW_DEBUG_HTTP=1 (ZgwDiagnosticHandler), which is
opt-in, dev-only and not persisted.

The new test fails the one call in the fixture whose url carries a query
string and asserts the persisted ZgwError has neither the body snippet nor a
"?", while keeping the path and the 503. Verified red without the fix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 10:57:09 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 fbd27ed641 fix(privacy): mask the BSN recorded as the document audit Actor (RB-04)
DocumentStore wrote one audit row per upload and per user delete carrying the
acting citizen's raw BSN as AuditEntry.Actor, persisted to SQLite — on a
store whose own doc comment says it holds metadata only, never file content
"or other PII". Same shape as RB-02, in a second store.

Masked at the two citizen call sites rather than inside Audit, because the
third actor is the literal "admin" and MaskTail("admin", 3) is "**min";
masking centrally would mean guessing which actors are BSNs and which are
role names. Audit's doc comment now states that actors arrive redacted.

StoredDocument.Owner is untouched: it is the authorization key that
DeleteOwned, ForeignIds and RB-01's content check all compare against, so the
BSN stays where it is load-bearing and leaves the trail where it was only
decoration. No endpoint exposes AuditLog, so no response shape changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 10:54:07 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 487818e67a fix(privacy): mask the owner BSN on the cross-owner case lists (RB-03)
Mappers.ToAdminSummaryDto set Owner to the raw BSN. Both consumers are
cross-owner lists read by someone who is not the subject — GET /admin/cases
and GET /werkvoorraad — while GET /beoordeling/{id}, the detail view of the
same data, already masked it. The detail screen showed ******782 and the list
one click earlier showed the whole thing.

Masked in the mapper rather than at each endpoint, so a third cross-owner
list cannot be added that forgets to.

MaskTail moves out of Program.cs into Domain/People/Pii.cs: it now has
callers in Contracts, Program.cs and (once RB-04 lands) Data, and a second
hand-rolled copy is how one of them drifts into leaking. Documented as
idempotent, which is what lets /beoordeling/{id} keep its own call —
IZaakSource has a second implementation whose Owner is mapped from the
OpenZaak zaak identificatie, so that endpoint should not depend on which
source answered.

No frontend change: all three consumers display the value, and the parse
boundaries only require a non-empty string.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 10:52:29 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 6ffd3643b1 fix(audit): stop writing a BSN into the authz audit Resource (RB-02)
Program.cs built the BIG-nummer reveal's audit resource ref as
"brief/" + ctx.Zorgverlener().Bsn. AuditAuthz persists that to the
AuthzAudit.Resource column in SQLite and /admin/audit renders it, so a BSN
reached durable storage and a UI on the one trail four documents describe as
data-minimised and PII-free — on the endpoint whose own comment promises the
audit carries no PII.

The ref is now "brief". Nothing is lost: BriefStore keys one brief per owner,
so the id named what the row's acting principal already implies.

The existing guard, The_audit_schema_carries_no_pii, asserts on column names,
so a BSN inside a column called Resource could never fail it. Added
No_audit_row_carries_a_subjects_bsn, which drives a denied reveal as a
non-default subject and scans every string field of every row for that BSN
and for DemoOwner — asserting on the two BSNs actually in play rather than a
\d{9} shape, since a hex correlation id can hold nine digits by chance.
Verified it goes red when only the Program.cs line is reverted.

AuditEntry.Actor on document audit rows holds a raw BSN too; that is a
different store and stays with RB-04.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 10:49:57 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 a2e935d1d8 fix(uploads): authorize the document-content and status endpoints (RB-01)
GET /uploads/{documentId}/content took only (string documentId) — no
HttpContext, so no authorization was possible. It streams diploma and
identity scans, protected by GUID unguessability alone, while DELETE on the
same resource has always been owner-scoped. GET /uploads/status had the same
shape and confirmed whether any client-chosen localId exists, plus its
documentId.

Both now take HttpContext. Content is readable by the owning
ZorgverlenerCaller or a caller passing Authz.CanBeoordelen — matched on the
caller kind rather than branched on a boolean, because ctx.Zorgverlener()
throws for a MedewerkerCaller and the behandelportal's beoordeling screen is
a legitimate reader. Status is scoped to ctx.Zorgverlener().Bsn via a new
owner parameter on DocumentStore.ByLocalIds (one call site).

404, not 403, on both: a foreign document id must not be distinguishable
from one that never existed, and a foreign localId reads back as "unknown".

Residual, recorded in the implementation note: both callers reach the URL as
a plain browser navigation (<a href> / previewUrl), which carries no identity
header and no interceptor, so StubIdentityProvider resolves it to the seeded
citizen. That is BIO-002 and belongs to RB-09; the links keep working today
only because one citizen owns every document in the POC.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-27 10:48:04 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 9440ce1345 fix(stamdata): evaluate the profession validity window per call, not at type-load
Professions.ByProgram was a `static readonly` field filtered on
DateTime.Today, so it evaluated once when the type first loaded. Two
consequences, both real:

- A long-running process kept serving the answer it computed at startup. A
  mapping whose geldigVan fell after boot never appeared; one whose geldigTot
  passed never disappeared.
- Both branches of StamdataFile.ActiveOn were unreachable from this caller,
  which is why this table's validity window had no test at all. It is the
  cleanest single explanation for Stamdata's 71.7% branch coverage (BL-005).

Adds ByProgramOn(DateOnly) — the peildatum as an argument, matching
StamdataTable.RowsOn which already parameterizes it — and makes ByProgram a
property delegating to it with today's date. Call sites (DiplomaRules) are
unchanged and keep the same behaviour, now with a current date.

ProfessionsTests covers both ActiveOn branches plus the regression itself:
the same date must give the same answer, a different date a different one.

Found by the testability pass (TE-009).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-26 18:13:38 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 6fa27d1c53 test: close the remaining FE/BE seams (WP-75)
Three seams WP-71 documented but left unguarded.

Deletes the FE's isHerregistratieEligible and isStatusConsistent — both
uncalled, the first dead by its own doc-comment. Their tests used fixtures
completely disjoint from the backend's (the backend even had an exact-window
boundary case the FE lacked), so the two sides could diverge indefinitely
without failing anything. CLAUDE.md's policy of keeping server-owned rules
as FE "reference impls" is what kept them alive, so it is amended: the FE may
mirror a server-supplied value for instant feedback, never reimplement the
algorithm. registration.policy.ts keeps its three live exports.

check-seam.sh now also guards the Besluit tag list — the C# enum and the TS
BESLUIT_TAGS array are identical ordered name lists with nothing linking
them, and Enum.TryParse fails at request time rather than build time. Anchored
on the full declaration so it avoids the "greps all matches" trap WP-69 hit.

The phone-format divergence turned out to be real, not latent as recorded:
the backend returned 422 for +31612345678 and (06) 12345678, both of which
the FE's own parseTelefoonnummer accepts. A grep check would have compared
the shared ^0\d{9}$ regex and reported all clear — the difference was in
stripping. RejectPhoneChange now strips what the FE strips, pinned by a
contract test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 16:32:22 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 6bc00a917c refactor(backend): delete dead legacy endpoints, make domain types unions (WP-72 + WP-73)
Two work packages in one commit because both edit Program.cs and splitting
them would leave a commit that does not build.

WP-72 — deletes POST /api/v1/intakes and /herregistraties. Both were dead
from the UI (the wizard submits via /applications/{id}/submit) and strictly
less capable: they minted a bare reference and wrote no Aanvraag, made no
ZGW call, and did no document-ownership check. The shared Submit(...) helper
survives — /registrations and /change-requests still use it. WP-69 hardened
/intakes with a 400 last session; removing the surface is the stronger fix,
and WP-69's /applications/{id}/submit enforcement is untouched.

WP-73 — RegistrationStatus becomes an abstract record with three sealed
variants behind a private base ctor, so only Geregistreerd carries a
herregistratie deadline and reden is required on Geschorst/Doorgehaald
(matching the FE union, which was already right). HerregistratieRule
.IsStatusConsistent and its test are deleted: the type now guarantees what
the runtime check was for, and the test could no longer construct the
illegal state it existed to catch.

Aanvraag splits into a Concept | Submitted | Decided union with the EF row
demoted to AanvraagEntity behind a two-way mapper. Submitted carries a
non-null Referentie and SubmittedAt, and Decided.Afgewezen/MeerInfoGevraagd
require a Toelichting — so the five Referentie! null-forgiving derefs in
StatusAt are gone, not merely suppressed. IZaakSource.CreateZaak narrows to
Aanvraag.Submitted, removing the same class of deref in both zaak sources.

Draft is now cleared on submit rather than lingering: ApplicationStore's
doc-comment claimed "Concept only" but Submit never cleared it. Verified
nothing reads a submitted aanvraag's draft (draft-sync's applyResume only
resumes unsubmitted wizards), so the comment is now true instead of
aspirational.

No migration, no schema change, no wire change — RegistrationStatusDto and
the application DTOs are byte-identical, confirmed against a live swagger.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 16:31:38 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 5d73ca21f6 feat(backend): enforce the scholing threshold server-side (WP-69)
ADR-0001's own canonical "config value" example was unenforced: GET
/intake/policy echoed ScholingThreshold, but no request DTO carried a
scholing answer, so the server had nothing to re-validate. A crafted
POST could skip a requirement the wizard presents as mandatory.

IntakePolicy.RejectIncompleteScholing is the authority — three-valued
completeness (below threshold an answer is required; "nee" is legal and
still submits; punten only belong to a followed scholing), living in the
class that owns the constant so scripts/check-seam.sh keeps guarding the
FE/BE literal pair. Both submit paths call it; a violation 400s with
ProblemDetails and leaves the aanvraag a Concept. Gated on
Type == "intake" (the endpoint's switch lumps herregistratie with
intake, which has no scholing question), and guarded by `reject is null`
so a zero-uren submission is still decided on its merits.

Also fixes a live FE bug in the same rule: validateStep required punten
whenever scholingGevolgd was 'ja' regardless of lageUren, while the
template renders those fields only when lageUren — so answering 'ja'
then raising uren either blocked the user on an invisible field or
emitted aanvullendeScholing: undefined alongside punten. punten now
derives from aanvullendeScholing, so that combination is unrepresentable
in ValidIntake.

Note: EndpointTests' Worked_hours_submission_succeeds was itself
asserting the vulnerable payload ({ uren: 40 }, no answer) and needed a
complete answer added; the zero-hours rows are the ordering regression
net and are unmodified.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 22:42:14 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 3652ff8d3f docs(test): make Given/When/Then the default BDD structure (WP-71)
bdd.mdx previously banned "Given/When/Then ceremony" outright, which
directly contradicted WP-70's own acceptance tests (Acceptance/
BesluitLifecycleTests.cs already used // Given/When/Then comments) and
the backend's organically-evolved PascalCase_snake_sentence convention,
which the doc gave zero guidance for. Reverses that rule: every test is
now structured Given -> When -> Then, with a genuinely empty phase
omitted rather than faked; present-tense declarative naming and the
one-behaviour-per-test rule are unchanged. ADR-0006 gets a cross-reference
so both documents agree everywhere, not just in acceptance tests.

Also closes out the doc's other named-but-unenforced rules found by the
audit: fixes the 5 files asserting rendered $localize copy instead of
the underlying tag/message-id (the compliant pattern already existed in
werkvoorraad-item-view.spec.ts), splits the multi-behaviour titles the
doc itself calls a smell (";", "and", "/"), and fixes bdd.mdx's own false
citation of registratie-wizard.machine.spec.ts as "one transition per
test" by actually splitting that test into one-transition-per-test.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 20:25:30 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 28c0a250e7 test(backend): split RuleTests.cs by aggregate, refresh DDD doc (WP-71)
RuleTests.cs held five aggregates' rules as nested classes in one file,
misaligned with Domain/<Aggregate>/ and with the Acceptance/Builders/
folder convention WP-70 started. Split into Domain/<Aggregate>RuleTests.cs
(pure move — same names, same bodies, same count) plus a new
ApplicationRuleTests.cs (the enum invariant moved out of the
WebApplicationFactory-booting ApplicationTests.cs, since it's a pure
Enum.GetNames check with no business needing a web host) and
OrgTemplateRuleTests.cs (RejectDraft had no direct unit test before,
only endpoint coverage).

libs/shared/docs/layers.mdx still taught the pre-WP-67 shape (six
contexts, no apps/libs split, enforcement via ESLint) — updated to the
real monorepo structure and to dependency-cruiser as the actual
enforcement mechanism. Adds specs for registration.policy.ts's
isStatusConsistent (untested; its backend mirror is) and both apps'
auth/domain/session.ts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 20:25:05 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 b937e55ad3 test: close illegal-state escape hatches in spec type-safety (WP-71)
ESLint blanket-exempted every *.spec.ts from the any ban, and no gate
type-checked spec files at all (ng test is transpile-only), so a wrong
cast in a test could never fail the build. 76 `as any` + 12 `as
Extract<>` state-narrowing casts in the three biggest wizard specs read
one variant's fields off a whole-union value: if the reducer returned
the wrong variant, the assertion silently read undefined instead of
failing.

expectTag(state, tag) (libs/shared/src/testing/expect-tag.ts) asserts
and narrows in one call, replacing every one of those casts. Removes
the spec-file any exemption, adds `npm run typecheck` (tsc --noEmit
over each project's tsconfig.spec.json) to CI, and forbids production
code from importing libs/shared/src/testing via dependency-cruiser.
Backend: AanvraagBuilder now models ZaakUrl (closing the last
post-Build() mutation) and guards AtStep; null-forgiving `!` on
endpoint assertions replaced with Assert.NotNull so a null DTO fails by
name, not NullReferenceException.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 20:24:53 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 2eea860efe test(backend): type-state Aanvraag builder, illegal fixtures unrepresentable (WP-70)
RuleTests/OpenZaakZaakSourceTests hand-built Aanvraag fixtures by initializer,
keeping Submitted/Referentie/SubmittedAt/BesluitStatus consistent by hand. A
type-state builder (Given.Concept().Submitted().Decided()) makes an illegal
sequence a compile error instead, and delegates the toelichting-required rule
to the real BeoordelingRules so it can't drift from production. Adds
BesluitLifecycleTests covering the WP-68 besluit invariants end to end.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 15:30:57 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 472a49f19f docs(backend): correct IntakePolicy's false re-validation claim (WP-68 F5)
The doc-comment claimed "the backend re-validates on submit as the authority" —
it doesn't. Neither SubmitApplicationRequest nor IntakeRequest carries a scholing
answer at all, so there's nothing to re-validate; both submit paths only apply
SubmissionRules.RejectZeroUren. A crafted POST can bypass the scholing requirement
entirely. States the gap and points to WP-69 (opened, not yet planned) for the
enforcement, which needs a wire change.

Also strengthens the F2 concurrency test to assert the persisted status matches
whichever request actually won the race, and updates WP-68's own Decisions/
acceptance-criteria text to reflect two implementation choices that improved on
the original write-up once real constraints surfaced: ProcessingWindow stays on
ApplicationStore (StatusAt is already in the same file), and AanvraagStatusTag is
not given a Concept member (would have broken
AanvraagStatusTag_covers_the_published_lifecycle) — AanvraagStatus.Tag is nullable
instead, null exactly for Concept.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 15:42:21 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 31d4aa1848 test(backend): cover WP-68 F2/F6/T3 (besluit concurrency, toelichting rule, transitions)
- Concurrent_besluiten_on_the_same_aanvraag_yield_exactly_one_success: races two
  besluiten on the same open aanvraag, asserts exactly one 200 and one 409 — the
  behavior F2's in-lock guard exists to guarantee.
- Only_a_non_approval_requires_a_toelichting: unit test for
  BeoordelingRules.RequiresToelichting (F6).
- A_terminal_decision_refuses_any_further_besluit /
  MeerInfoOpvragen_is_not_terminal_a_further_besluit_is_still_legal: the transition
  table at the aggregate level (T3) — an Aanvraag whose BesluitStatus already records
  a decision computes a terminal StatusAt, and CanDecide refuses a further besluit,
  independent of the endpoint-level equivalent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 15:38:30 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 fc6e73806a refactor(backend): move aanvraag status lifecycle into the domain (WP-68 F3)
The status was derived in Contracts/Mappers.ToStatusDto, not the domain; Concept was
a magic "Concept" string with no AanvraagStatusTag member; and the besluit endpoint
re-derived its own guard by reading the status back out of the DTO and Enum.Parse-ing
it. New Domain/Applications/AanvraagStatus.cs models the full status (Concept
included, via a null Tag rather than a sixth enum member) as a closed type,
constructible only through its factories. Aanvraag.StatusAt(now) carries the logic
verbatim; Mappers.ToStatusDto and ZgwZaakMapper's two status producers become
one-line projections onto the same wire DTO, so the wire shape is unchanged (gen:api
shows zero diff beyond F1's). The one remaining Enum.Parse (the beoordeling GET,
which crosses the IZaakSource wire boundary) is now non-throwing on an unrecognised
tag.

Also, WP-68 F2: the besluit transition-legality check now runs inside
ApplicationStore.RecordBesluit's write lock instead of in the endpoint beforehand —
two concurrent besluiten used to both pass the check before either wrote, letting
the second silently overwrite a terminal decision. RecordBesluit returns an
Ok/NotFound/Conflict outcome, mirroring DocumentStore.DeleteResult.

Also, WP-68 F6: the "toelichting required" rule moves from an inline endpoint check
into BeoordelingRules.RequiresToelichting, alongside CanDecide.

The three tests naming this refactor's regression net
(AanvraagStatusTag_covers_the_published_lifecycle,
AutoApprovable_flips_to_goedgekeurd_after_the_window, ZgwZaakMapperTests) pass
unmodified.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 15:34:10 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 fd04221d2f chore(api): regenerate client for F1's new 400 responses
npm run gen:api after WP-68 F1 — draft-sync and submit now document their
document-ownership 400 ProblemDetails response.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 15:33:50 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 a394950a1d fix(backend): reject foreign documentIds on submit and draft-sync (WP-68 F1)
submit and draft-sync took document ids straight from the request body with no
ownership check: a caller who knew a foreign document's id could attach another
citizen's upload to their own aanvraag (surfacing on the behandelaar's beoordeling
screen, POSTed to OpenZaak as their zaakinformatieobject) and permanently block the
victim's own delete by flipping Linked=true. ADR-0001 holds the FE has no authority;
this trusted it anyway.

Adds DocumentStore.ForeignIds(ids, owner) and calls it from both write paths before
any write, 400 ProblemDetails on a mismatch.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 15:24:32 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 5 6cfd70eeeb fix(backend): resolve besluit endpoint's id via Referentie, not local PK
POST /beoordeling/{id}/besluit always 404'd against a real OpenZaak: {id} is the
FE-facing case id from IZaakSource.ListCases, which under OpenZaakZaakSource is the
ZGW zaak's own uuid, not ApplicationStore's primary key. Resolve the case through
ListCases first (same seam the GET sibling already uses), then to the local Aanvraag
via its Referentie — the one identifier stable across both sources.

Adds ApplicationStore.GetByReferentie and a regression test that reproduces the
divergence with a decorating IZaakSource test double instead of a live OpenZaak.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-05 15:20:36 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 d996ca2463 feat(behandelportal): WP-66 wire the decision into OpenZaak
Extends IZaakSource with RecordBesluit, mirroring WP-50's CreateZaak write
pattern: OpenZaakZaakSource POSTs a new Statussen entry (highest-volgnummer
statustype, since the harness catalogus has no per-outcome besluittype),
carrying the besluit + toelichting in statustoelichting; LocalZaakSource
no-ops. The beoordeling endpoint calls it after the local decision commits,
flagging a failure via RecordZgwDivergence the same way submit's
create-zaak/document writes do — closing WP-60's "second write pair" gap.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-04 09:41:28 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 af8a011819 feat(behandelportal): WP-65b beoordeling besluit (decision write)
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 56s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 2m36s
CI / storybook-a11y (pull_request) Failing after 3m19s
CI / backend (pull_request) Failing after 1m55s
CI / api-client-drift (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Canceled after 40s
CI / semgrep (pull_request) Canceled after 24s
Adds POST /beoordeling/{id}/besluit: a Besluit enum (Goedkeuren/Afwijzen/
MeerInfoOpvragen) backed by new Aanvraag.BesluitStatus/BesluitToelichting
columns, gated by the same BeoordelingRules.CanDecide the read side's
canBesluiten flag already uses (409 on an illegal transition, 400 on a
missing required toelichting). Mappers.ToStatusDto gains the "a recorded
decision wins" branch. FE: besluit.machine.ts + besluit-form organism
(same form idiom as change-request-form), wired into the beoordeling page
behind the server's canBesluiten flag.

Completes WP-65 (65a + 65b) — verified end-to-end against a running
backend (werkvoorraad -> beoordeling -> besluit -> status reflected back).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 09:46:20 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 4133b30e5d feat(behandelportal): WP-65a beoordeling detail (read) + fix unreachable medewerker login
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / lint (pull_request) Failing after 54s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 2m38s
CI / storybook-a11y (pull_request) Failing after 3m28s
CI / backend (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
CI / semgrep (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 2m55s
CI / api-client-drift (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
New GET /beoordeling/{id} shows one aanvraag's status, linked documents, and a
canBesluiten decision flag, gated by the same CanBeoordelen capability as the
werkvoorraad list. Reads through IZaakSource.ListCases rather than a new seam
method (WP-66 needs one anyway for the real write); owner BSN is masked.

Fixes a real gap found while wiring this up: the behandelportal's login was still
WP-61's copied citizen/BSN DigiD flow, so nothing ever sent X-Medewerker and the
werkvoorraad screen (WP-64) always denied in a real browser. A dev-only
medewerkerInterceptor (mirrors the existing ?role= stand-in as ?rollen=) fixes that.

WP-65's own Risks note authorized splitting read from write across sessions given
its size; this is the read half. The decision-recording mutation is next (65b).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 09:01:09 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 fe69caee63 feat(behandelportal): WP-64 werkvoorraad (queue) screen
CI / changes (pull_request) Successful in 15s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 57s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 2m36s
CI / storybook-a11y (pull_request) Failing after 3m14s
CI / backend (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
CI / semgrep (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
CI / e2e (pull_request) Successful in 3m3s
CI / api-client-drift (pull_request) Successful in 2m1s
New GET /werkvoorraad endpoint lists aanvragen still open (Ingediend/InBehandeling),
gated by the medewerker capability (CanBeoordelen) rather than the admin role — reuses
the existing ApplicationSummaryDto, no new DTO. GET /me now surfaces aanvraag:beoordelen
for a behandelaar so the FE can gate with the same AccessStore/capabilityGuard idiom
every other page uses.

FE: a behandeling domain type deliberately narrower than ssp's full AanvraagStatus
union (only the two open tags — illegal states unrepresentable), composed into a
werkvoorraad-list organism from existing shared/ui molecules. Replaces WP-61's
scaffold placeholder as the app's real landing page.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 22:02:35 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 d3f3b13345 feat(behandelportal): WP-63 aanvraag status lifecycle enum
CI / changes (push) Successful in 8s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 50s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 1m32s
CI / backend (push) Successful in 1m50s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 3m7s
CI / storybook-a11y (push) Successful in 6m53s
CI / semgrep (push) Successful in 1m12s
CI / api-client-drift (push) Successful in 1m43s
Model the full ADR-0002 lifecycle (Ingediend/InBehandeling/
MeerInfoGevraagd/Goedgekeurd/Afgewezen) as a backend enum backing the
existing AanvraagStatusDto.Tag string, and widen the FE union/parse
boundary/switches to match. Ingediend/MeerInfoGevraagd aren't reachable
yet (no behandelaar transition exists) — that's WP-65. Zero DTO shape
change, so gen:api has no drift.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 08:56:47 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 a09c4ed87b feat(behandelportal): WP-62 medewerker caller identity + authz seam
Splits backend CallerIdentity into the two ADR-0002 §3 actor kinds
(ZorgverlenerCaller/MedewerkerCaller), a stub X-Medewerker/X-Rollen header
path mirroring WP-53's citizen stub, and Authz.CanBeoordelen as the first
medewerker capability — backend-only, no consumer until WP-64. Also fixes
the backlog README's stale WP-61 status (done, but table said todo).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 23:47:43 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 ba24784586 feat(openzaak): one-command UI-OpenZaak bridge, real BSN fix, flake mitigation
CI / changes (push) Successful in 8s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 55s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 1m33s
CI / backend (push) Successful in 1m46s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 3m14s
CI / storybook-a11y (push) Successful in 6m50s
CI / semgrep (push) Successful in 1m13s
CI / api-client-drift (push) Successful in 1m47s
scripts/openzaak-ui-up.sh brings up the root app and the OpenZaak harness
together, wires them onto one docker network, seeds the catalogus, grants
the container-alias zaaktype scope, and verifies a real aanvraag submitted
through the UI lands in OpenZaak.

Along the way: DocumentStore.DemoOwner was reusing the seeded doctor's
11-digit BIG-nummer as a stand-in BSN, which isn't a valid 9-digit BSN shape
— OpenZaak rejects it, breaking both submit's rol-creation step and the
citizen's own applications list under Zgw:Enabled=true. Fixed to a real
elfproef-valid BSN.

Also adds mitigation for a still-unexplained per-container flake (every
outbound ZGW POST fails as if the body were empty, for that container's
whole lifetime) that correlates with host memory pressure: the script now
warns when host swap is heavily used, and an opt-in ZgwDiagnosticHandler
(ZGW_DEBUG_HTTP=1) logs Content-Length vs. actual bytes sent so the next
reproduction can confirm or rule out client-side body corruption.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 08:23:01 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 3ff80c124f feat(openzaak): bounded retry + flagged write divergence (WP-60)
Local aanvraag/document writes and their paired ZGW writes aren't
transactional; a ZGW failure after the local write succeeds used to
diverge silently. ZgwHttpClient now retries transport-shaped failures
(not 500, which can follow a partial commit on the non-idempotent
statussen/rollen POSTs), and a ZGW failure that survives retry sets
Aanvraag.ZgwError plus a zgw:divergence audit row instead of failing
or diverging quietly. No outbox/reconcile job: three request-triggered
write paths don't justify a persisted queue that would also need to
carry citizen PII for the JWT audit claims.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 18:11:55 +02:00
eho 67abc58052 feat(openzaak): per-document-type confidentialiteit config (WP-59)
Drives the DRC upload's vertrouwelijkheidaanduiding from a new stamdata
table instead of the hardcoded "openbaar", following the existing
config-as-code pattern (ADR-0004). Adds the referential-integrity check
StamdataValidationTests was missing for the new table.
2026-07-30 17:30:25 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 3e983bd2cc feat(openzaak): real notification delivery to the BFF webhook (WP-58)
OpenZaak doesn't serve the Notificaties API itself (it's a separate app,
open-notificaties) — standing one up for a real abonnement would triple
this harness for a benefit it doesn't need (exactly one subscriber, this
repo's own BFF). Instead, an opt-in compose overlay adds a celery worker
and points OpenZaak's NotificationsConfig straight at the BFF's webhook
via a zgw_consumers Service; bootstrap-notificaties.sh configures it
idempotently and verify-notificatie.sh proves a real write delivers to
the BFF's audit trail end-to-end.

Verified live: preflight proves the webhook's shared-secret gate both
ways (204/401), a zaak PATCH triggers real celery delivery, and rerunning
both scripts against an already-configured harness stays idempotent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 15:33:16 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 1e87997ea0 feat(openzaak): least-privilege client scopes (WP-57)
setup_configuration has no YAML field for granular autorisaties, so
bigregister-test now starts at heeft_alle_autorisaties: false (dev + prod
template) and bootstrap-catalogus.sh grants exactly the ztc/zrc scopes the
harness needs via the Django ORM, sidestepping the zero-scope
chicken-and-egg with the JWT-authenticated Autorisaties REST API.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 14:05:54 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 89ad3490b0 feat(openzaak): idempotent catalogus/zaaktype/zaak provisioning (WP-56)
CI / changes (push) Successful in 8s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 53s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 1m42s
CI / backend (push) Successful in 2m11s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 3m58s
CI / storybook-a11y (push) Successful in 8m8s
CI / semgrep (push) Successful in 1m17s
CI / api-client-drift (push) Successful in 1m50s
bootstrap-catalogus.sh now looks up every resource by its natural key before
creating it (catalogus by domein+rsin, zaaktype by catalogus+identificatie,
statustype by zaaktype+volgnummer, roltype by zaaktype+omschrijvingGeneriek,
zaaktype-publish by checking `concept` first, zaak by identificatie,
status/rol by existence-under-the-zaak), so rerunning against an
already-seeded instance reuses what's there instead of erroring.

The WP's original plan (move this into OpenZaak's `setup_configuration`
mechanism) turned out not to be achievable: reading the actual
django_setup_configuration steps installed inside the open-zaak image shows
no step exists for Catalogi/Zaken content anywhere in this OpenZaak version
— only sites/credentials/applicaties/selectielijst. Documented as a
deviation; the WP's own Risks section already anticipated this and sanctioned
falling back to an idempotent script.

Verified live: fresh instance -> full run (all created) -> integration test
green -> reran the script twice more against the same instance (all reused,
identical URLs, no duplicates) -> integration test still green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 12:57:37 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 3588057a75 feat(openzaak): real secrets + TLS for the production OpenZaak harness (WP-55)
CI / changes (push) Successful in 8s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 12s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 14s
CI / storybook-a11y (push) Successful in 17s
CI / backend (push) Successful in 1m51s
CI / semgrep (push) Successful in 1m13s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 2m56s
CI / api-client-drift (push) Successful in 1m41s
docker-compose.openzaak.prod.yml layers real SECRET_KEY/DB password/site
domain/allowed-hosts (all required, fail-fast via ${VAR:?...}) on top of the
WP-54 dev harness, switches Postgres off trust auth, and sets IS_HTTPS for a
front-facing reverse-proxy TLS setup. The ZGW client secret lives inside a
file setup_configuration reads rather than a compose env var, so it's
templated (data.prod.yaml.template, no secret) and rendered host-side via
render-prod-secrets.sh into a gitignored data.prod.yaml, mounted over the
container's dev data.yaml. ZgwOptions.cs already binds from IConfiguration,
so the BFF side needed no code change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 12:27:21 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 ebf1f8f8b4 fix(backend): run the prod image as non-root (semgrep, live Gitea finding)
CI / changes (push) Successful in 8s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 10s
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 13s
CI / storybook-a11y (push) Successful in 17s
CI / backend (push) Successful in 1m45s
CI / semgrep (push) Successful in 1m9s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 2m53s
CI / api-client-drift (push) Successful in 1m46s
The pushed WP-30 item-5 Dockerfile predated the semgrep triage's local run —
CI's now-blocking semgrep gate caught what local verification couldn't:
dockerfile.security.missing-user-entrypoint (no USER, container runs as root).

mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:10.0 ships a pre-created non-root user for
exactly this ($APP_UID, uid/gid 1654) — switched to it, with --chown on both
COPY layers so the app can still create/write bigregister.db (WP-22, a
relative-path SQLite connection string resolved against the container's /app
cwd) as that user.

Verified for real: rebuilt, confirmed `whoami` is `app` inside the container,
ran it and curled a live GET /api/v1/brief/preview (200), confirmed
bigregister.db was created and is actually owned by app:app. Full semgrep
re-run (this file didn't exist during the original triage) is now 0 findings.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 10:11:54 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 a0d8804a53 feat(backend): optional lean deployable image (WP-30 #5)
Multi-stage backend/Dockerfile (sdk build -> aspnet:10.0 runtime, ~312MB) +
docker-compose.prod.yml, additive only — not wired into CI or the existing
dev docker-compose.yml (which keeps the SDK image for dotnet run hot-reload).
New .dockerignore keeps the build context lean (node_modules alone is
~750MB) since the Dockerfile COPYs from the repo root to pick up
public/letter.css (WP-25's FE<->BE letter contract) as a sibling of backend/.

Verified for real: built the image, ran it, and curled a live
GET /api/v1/brief/preview against the running container — got back the
actual rendered letter HTML with letter.css inlined, confirming the
walk-up-from-BaseDirectory lookup resolves inside this image layout too.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 09:35:21 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 5cb3e1a9f0 feat(zgw): docker OpenZaak integration-test harness (WP-54)
Opt-in docker-compose (postgres+redis+OpenZaak, no celery/nginx) +
bootstrap-catalogus.sh seed a real OpenZaak instance; OpenZaakIntegrationTests
(Category=Integration, excluded from default dotnet test/CI) proves the ZGW
seam against it for the first time. That live run caught a real bug:
ZgwHttpClient never sent Content-Crs/Accept-Crs headers, so every write would
412 against a spec-compliant OpenZaak — fixed alongside the harness.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 09:08:35 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 73172510ea feat(zgw): real per-request identity seam + citizen-scoping (WP-53)
CI / frontend (push) Failing after 1m19s
CI / backend (push) Successful in 2m0s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 3m57s
CI / storybook-a11y (push) Successful in 7m45s
CI / semgrep (push) Successful in 1m6s
CI / api-client-drift (push) Successful in 1m55s
Replaces the hardcoded DocumentStore.DemoOwner and the static ZgwOptions
UserId/UserRepresentation with one per-request CallerIdentity, resolved by a
pluggable IIdentityProvider (StubIdentityProvider reads X-Role/X-Subject
today; a real OIDC/DigiD provider swaps in without touching any consumer).

- Domain/Authorization/{CallerIdentity,IIdentityProvider,StubIdentityProvider}.cs
  + a resolution middleware in Program.cs, right after correlation-id.
- Authz.ResolvePrincipal(ctx) keeps its signature (now reads ctx.Caller().Role),
  so its ~15 call sites needed no changes.
- Every endpoint that passed DocumentStore.DemoOwner to a store now passes
  ctx.Caller().Bsn.
- ZgwTokenProvider gains Mint(CallerIdentity) alongside the original Mint()
  (kept for calls not tied to one citizen); ZgwHttpClient threads an optional
  caller through to pick the right overload.
- IZaakSource gains ListMyCases(caller, now) — the citizen-scoped read
  OpenZaakZaakSource backs with ZGW's rol__...__inpBsn filter. GET /applications
  now routes through it instead of ApplicationStore directly, closing the last
  "reads a static store" gap for a citizen-facing endpoint.

Backend 159/159 tests (+8, incl. an HTTP-level two-identity scoping proof),
npm run ci green, no api-client drift.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 08:27:53 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 bea04549dd feat(zgw): finish WP-52 OpenZaak Notificaties (NRC) webhook slice
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m33s
CI / backend (push) Successful in 1m45s
CI / storybook-a11y (push) Successful in 7m47s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 4m3s
CI / semgrep (push) Successful in 1m7s
CI / api-client-drift (push) Successful in 2m3s
Endpoint/DTO/options landed already in c4dd846; this closes the loop with
NotificatieTests.cs (accept/reject/missing-header, asserting the AuthzAuditStore
row), missing appsettings.json keys (also backfills DrcBaseUrl/
InformatieobjecttypeUrls, stale since WP-51), and the webhook + abonnement
provisioning docs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 08:07:50 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 c4dd846fbb fix(ci): unbreak backend format, storybook-a11y, and e2e jobs
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m12s
CI / backend (push) Successful in 1m37s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 3m33s
CI / storybook-a11y (push) Successful in 8m23s
CI / semgrep (push) Successful in 1m4s
CI / api-client-drift (push) Successful in 1m52s
- backend: dotnet format the WP-51 migration (2-space indent, no BOM)
  to match .editorconfig — dotnet format --verify-no-changes was failing.
- storybook: stub FeatureFlagStore (WP-47) in shell/site-header stories
  alongside AccessStore, fixing NG0201 no-provider errors; bump the
  storybook-a11y container's memory cap 4g→6g (build-storybook +
  compodoc measured ~5.8GB peak RSS, leaving too little headroom).
- backend: fix a startup-breaking bug in the new (WP-52) POST
  /zgw/notificaties handler — it took ZgwOptions as a minimal-API
  parameter, which isn't registered in DI, so ASP.NET's endpoint-table
  build threw on every request once the route was registered (incl.
  /swagger, which is why Playwright's webServer health check timed
  out). Close over the existing `zgw` local instead.
- e2e: brief-v2.spec.ts's "Voorbeeld" button locator was ambiguous
  once a second "Voorbeeld met testwaarden" button existed (Playwright
  name matching is substring-based) — added `exact: true`. Also fixed
  the sent-letter preview flow to match app-letter-composer's actual
  behavior (single click → fetch, no in-page dialog, unlike
  app-behandel-scherm's), and fixed a watermark assertion that checked
  for the always-present `.preview-watermark` CSS class name instead
  of the conditionally-rendered "VOORBEELD" marker text.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 07:18:07 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 5807937229 feat(zgw): OpenZaak Documenten (DRC) upload + zaak link (WP-51)
Extends the OpenZaak seam with IDocumentSource, sibling of IZaakSource
(WP-49/50): an upload always lands locally first (DocumentStore stays
the record of truth for preview/download/audit) and, when
Zgw:Enabled=true, is also registered as a DRC enkelvoudiginformatie-
object; once a zaak exists (IZaakSource.CreateZaak now also returns
its ZaakUrl), submit links each document to it via zaakinformatie-
object. FE upload/list DTOs are unchanged.

- ZgwOptions gains DrcBaseUrl + a category->informatieobjecttype URL
  map (the document analogue of ZaaktypeUrls).
- LocalDocumentSource is the same DocumentStore.Add/Link calls the
  endpoints used to make inline — zero behaviour change offline.
- OpenZaakDocumentSource POSTs the eio then the zaak link, persisting
  the DRC url (DocumentStore.SetDrcUrl) so linking doesn't re-upload.
- Factored the GET/POST-with-bearer-JWT plumbing shared with
  OpenZaakZaakSource into ZgwHttpClient; shared the stub handler
  between the two source test classes as ZgwStubHandler.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 20:54:31 +02:00
ehoandClaude Sonnet 5 de3bff0d7f feat(zgw): OpenZaak create-zaak, first write slice (WP-50)
Extends the IZaakSource seam (WP-49, read-only) with CreateZaak: submitting
an aanvraag now also registers a Zaak + Status + Rol in OpenZaak when
Zgw:Enabled=true, routed through the existing /applications/{id}/submit
endpoint with the FE response DTO unchanged (ADR-0001/ADR-0005 — the
endpoint never branches on the config flag itself, DI already picked the
implementation).

- ZgwOptions gains a Type→zaaktype-URL map + the two RSINs a Zaak needs.
- LocalZaakSource.CreateZaak is a pure passthrough of what the endpoint
  already computes locally (zero behaviour change for the offline default).
- OpenZaakZaakSource.CreateZaak POSTs the zaak (identificatie = the same
  local reference, so both stay in sync), resolves + POSTs the initial
  status and the initiator rol (BSN) via Catalogi lookups, and maps the
  result back into the submit response.
- Marked ponytail shortcuts: first-statustype/roltype-Catalogi-returns
  (no per-type config) and no compensating transaction on partial failure
  — both fine for a first slice against a demo backend.

Verified: full `npm run ci` green, zero api-client drift, 144/144 backend
tests (142 existing + 2 new stub-handler tests asserting the POST bodies
+ type→zaaktype mapping per the acceptance criteria).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 09:03:13 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 4.8 1c3c195d32 feat(backend): expand stamdata + OpenZaak-ready cases seam (WP-49)
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m59s
CI / backend (push) Successful in 1m27s
CI / semgrep (push) Successful in 58s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 2m30s
CI / api-client-drift (push) Canceled after 1m14s
CI / storybook-a11y (push) Canceled after 29m8s
Stamdata: add beroepen, opleidingen (temporal), and specialismen tables to the
schema-driven catalog (zero UI code). opleidingen.beroep and specialismen.beroep
both reference beroepen.code — the first stamdata->stamdata references, enforced by
two new StamdataRef entries in the CI gate.

OpenZaak/ZGW (WP-49, slice 1 — read-only zaken): introduce IZaakSource as the cases
read seam. Default LocalZaakSource reads the local SQLite store (offline); an
OpenZaakZaakSource (Zgw/ client: HS256 per-call JWT, ZGW->existing-DTO mapper,
paginating HTTP source) is selected behind Zgw:Enabled (default false). The FE never
changes — same ApplicationSummaryDto, no api-client drift. Unit-tested with fixtures
+ a stub HttpMessageHandler; no live OpenZaak needed.

Docs: ADR-0005, reference/openzaak-integration.md, WP-49..52 roadmap, stamdata.md
update, README index rows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-24 15:01:06 +02:00
ehoandClaude Opus 4.8 fbc4bf51d0 feat(beheer): stamdata deletion protection — CI referential gate + editor expire/warn
CI / frontend (push) Successful in 2m27s
CI / backend (push) Successful in 2m3s
CI / storybook-a11y (push) Failing after 6m30s
CI / semgrep (push) Successful in 1m5s
CI / e2e (push) Successful in 3m22s
CI / api-client-drift (push) Successful in 2m10s
CI gate (authoritative): generalize the dangling-reference test in StamdataValidationTests
into a declared, extensible reference list ("every declared reference into a stamdata key
resolves against the currently-valid stamdata"), starting with Diploma.Opleiding →
professions.program. Removing/renaming a referenced program, or expiring it while current
data still references it, fails the PR build (ADR-0004). Editor (fast feedback): confirm
before delete (warns a referenced row fails CI) and, for temporal tables, a "Sluiten per
vandaag" action that closes validity (geldigTot) — steering to expire over hard delete.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-23 22:35:17 +02:00