ehoandClaude Opus 5
664a43bf2d
Runs the multi-agent refactoring-backlog pipeline in docs/project/ refactor-backlog-setup/ up to and including three of the seven Phase 1 agents. 00-baseline.md establishes the metrics every later agent must cite, using only tooling already in the repo (vitest lcov, coverlet cobertura, ESLint's core `complexity` rule at threshold 0 for a full distribution, depcruise --metrics). Duplication and C# complexity had no tooling, so tools/baseline-scan.mjs adds a deterministic ~200-line text scan rather than a new dependency; the approximations are labelled as such. Headline: FE 75.1% line coverage but only over the 98 of 220 source files a spec loads; BE 97.6% line / 79.6% branch; 0 layering violations; 7.1% duplication; 25 of 2085 TS functions over CC 10. Then 02-testability, 04-cqrs-light and 06-adr-conformance (27 findings). 01/03/05 were skipped deliberately — the baseline shows little for them to find; 07 (BIO2) and 08 (consolidation) are still open. Each agent corrected a baseline observation of mine, and in every case the error was in something derived rather than measured: - BL-007 counted ~13 adapter "mutations" from the `runSubmit` helper name; 5 of those call sites are reads. It also missed 3 real mutations that reach the raw ApiClient and never return a Result. - BL-002 diagnosed the 100%-duplicated auth folders as ADR-0002's divergence prediction failing. It never had a chance to fail: §3's `Principal` union was never built. - BL-004 named libs/shared/domain and libs/beheer/contracts as coverage gaps; both are pure type declarations where 0% is unimprovable. All three corrections are recorded inline in 00-baseline.md §10, so agent 08 does not inherit the bad numbers. .prettierignore excludes the agent prompt directories — reflowing their markdown would edit the prompt text itself. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
34 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
34 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
MODEL: Sonnet
|
|
OUTPUT: status update in /refactor-backlog/99-backlog.md +
|
|
/refactor-backlog/implementation/[ticket-id].md
|
|
DEPENDS ON: ticket status = not_started, no unresolved compliance/ADR-fix flag,
|
|
all tickets in "Depends on" column = implemented or needs_review
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
[Insert contents of _persistence-protocol.md here — scoped to one ticket, not a
|
|
module list]
|
|
|
|
AGENT: Implementation Agent
|
|
|
|
Input: one ticket from 99-backlog.md (fill in TICKET-ID below), the Phase 1
|
|
file(s) that produced it, and 00-baseline.md.
|
|
|
|
TICKET-ID: [fill in before dispatching this agent]
|
|
|
|
Scope discipline:
|
|
- Implement exactly the change described in the ticket. No scope expansion, no
|
|
incidental fixes.
|
|
- If the ticket is ambiguous or underspecified for implementation, do not guess —
|
|
write a blocker note to the ticket's status and stop.
|
|
- Do not modify architecture/pattern decisions (hexagonal boundaries, CQRS-light
|
|
structure) — those are Opus-level design calls already made in the ticket. If
|
|
implementation reveals the design call was wrong, flag back to Consolidation
|
|
rather than deciding unilaterally.
|
|
- Tickets touching a BIO2-flagged item are blocked until human compliance
|
|
sign-off is recorded in the ticket status — do not implement first and flag
|
|
after.
|
|
|
|
Update ticket status in 99-backlog.md: not_started → in_progress → implemented
|
|
→ needs_review. Append implementation notes to implementation/[ticket-id].md.
|