ehoandClaude Opus 5
664a43bf2d
Runs the multi-agent refactoring-backlog pipeline in docs/project/ refactor-backlog-setup/ up to and including three of the seven Phase 1 agents. 00-baseline.md establishes the metrics every later agent must cite, using only tooling already in the repo (vitest lcov, coverlet cobertura, ESLint's core `complexity` rule at threshold 0 for a full distribution, depcruise --metrics). Duplication and C# complexity had no tooling, so tools/baseline-scan.mjs adds a deterministic ~200-line text scan rather than a new dependency; the approximations are labelled as such. Headline: FE 75.1% line coverage but only over the 98 of 220 source files a spec loads; BE 97.6% line / 79.6% branch; 0 layering violations; 7.1% duplication; 25 of 2085 TS functions over CC 10. Then 02-testability, 04-cqrs-light and 06-adr-conformance (27 findings). 01/03/05 were skipped deliberately — the baseline shows little for them to find; 07 (BIO2) and 08 (consolidation) are still open. Each agent corrected a baseline observation of mine, and in every case the error was in something derived rather than measured: - BL-007 counted ~13 adapter "mutations" from the `runSubmit` helper name; 5 of those call sites are reads. It also missed 3 real mutations that reach the raw ApiClient and never return a Result. - BL-002 diagnosed the 100%-duplicated auth folders as ADR-0002's divergence prediction failing. It never had a chance to fail: §3's `Principal` union was never built. - BL-004 named libs/shared/domain and libs/beheer/contracts as coverage gaps; both are pure type declarations where 0% is unimprovable. All three corrections are recorded inline in 00-baseline.md §10, so agent 08 does not inherit the bad numbers. .prettierignore excludes the agent prompt directories — reflowing their markdown would edit the prompt text itself. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
MODEL: Opus
|
||
OUTPUT FILE: /refactor-backlog/99-backlog.md
|
||
DEPENDS ON: 01-readability.md through 07-bio2-compliance.md (all complete)
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
[Insert contents of _persistence-protocol.md here — file-level: re-run only if a
|
||
Phase 1 file changed since last run]
|
||
|
||
ROLE: Consolidation & CD-Sequencing Agent
|
||
|
||
Input: all Phase 1 files (01–07) + 00-baseline.md.
|
||
|
||
1. Deduplicate overlapping findings across agents — merge into one ticket, list all
|
||
contributing reasons/agents.
|
||
2. Score priority:
|
||
P1 = violates a correct ADR, blocks testability, or is a BIO2 compliance risk.
|
||
P2 = significant maintainability cost, moderate effort.
|
||
P3 = low urgency.
|
||
3. Sequence for continuous delivery: every ticket must be independently deployable
|
||
without a big-bang release. Reject/split any ticket that can't ship alone —
|
||
decompose into a dependency chain of smaller tickets.
|
||
4. Any ticket touched by the BIO2 agent requires compliance sign-off before merge,
|
||
regardless of priority score — mark explicitly.
|
||
5. Output final table:
|
||
|
||
| ID | Module | Category | Description | Baseline metric improved | Effort (S/M/L) |
|
||
Risk | Priority | CD batch # | Depends on | Status |
|
||
|
||
6. Separately list "ADR-fix" tickets — require human/architect approval before any
|
||
dependent code ticket proceeds.
|
||
|
||
HALT CONDITION: after writing 99-backlog.md, stop and report to the human for
|
||
approval before any Implementation Agent (Phase 3) starts — even if no tickets
|
||
carry a compliance or ADR-fix flag.
|