RD-05 through RD-08 replaced the hand-called submit method with createStore's effect map. Two teaching documents still showed the old method in a code block, as the answer to "how does a submit happen?". Both blocks also called a function that no longer exists. Rewrite the code block in ARCHITECTURE.md section 2d and its fp-tea-atomic-design.md counterpart. Both now show the effect map, keyed on the Submitting tag, using the same herregistratie worked example with its optimistic begin/confirm/rollback calls. Both use draftSync.submit, the call the two herregistratie wizards make today. State the two properties the old idiom lacked, since they are the reason for the change: entering a state runs its effect, so a dispatch cannot skip it; and double-submit protection is structural, because the effect fires only on a tag transition. Add one sentence on the Seed exemption: a mount or restore message must not trigger a submit. Fix the one runIfSubmitting() hop in the write walkthrough at ARCHITECTURE.md's line 574. The rest of section 6a stays stale on purpose — RD-31 owns it, including its line citations and dead paths. fp-tea-atomic-design.md's broken pre-monorepo paths stay stale too — RD-32 owns those. Set RD-09's Status to done and its README row to done in the same commit. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
133 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
133 lines
5.8 KiB
Markdown
# RD-09 — Update the two documents that teach the deleted submit idiom
|
|
|
|
Status: done
|
|
Source: PLAN.md 1c (A5, as corrected)
|
|
|
|
## Why
|
|
|
|
RD-05 through RD-08 replaced the hand-called `runIfSubmitting` with `createStore`'s effect
|
|
map, and `grep` now finds the method nowhere in `apps/` or `libs/`. Two teaching documents
|
|
still present it as the house idiom, in a code block, as the answer to "how does a submit
|
|
happen?".
|
|
|
|
Both blocks are doubly stale: they teach a deleted idiom **and** call
|
|
`submitHerregistratie(s.data)`, a function that no longer exists either.
|
|
|
|
A document that teaches a deleted idiom is worse than no document — a reader who follows it
|
|
reintroduces the silent-failure bug RD-06 fixed.
|
|
|
|
## Read first
|
|
|
|
- `libs/shared/src/application/store.ts` — the effect map, the trigger rule, the `Seed`
|
|
exemption, and the "must never throw" contract. This is the new idiom to document.
|
|
- Any migrated call site, as a worked example — `besluit-form.component.ts` is the smallest.
|
|
- `docs/reference/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md` §2d (the block at 306-322) and the write
|
|
walkthrough mention at :574.
|
|
- `docs/reference/fp-tea-atomic-design.md` (the block at 336-350).
|
|
|
|
## Decisions (pre-made, don't relitigate)
|
|
|
|
1. **Scope is exactly two documents.** An earlier version of this plan claimed
|
|
`plop-templates/form-machine.hbs` generates `runIfSubmitting` and that
|
|
`.claude/skills/form-machine/SKILL.md` teaches it. **Both are false**, verified by grep:
|
|
the plop template is machine-only (74 lines, no `@Component`), and the skill never mentions
|
|
it. Do not "fix" either file. If you find yourself editing a `.hbs` or a `SKILL.md`, stop.
|
|
|
|
2. **Rewrite the code block, do not delete the section.** §2d ("Side effects (HTTP) without
|
|
polluting the reducer") and its fp-tea counterpart answer a real question and answer it
|
|
well. The answer changed; the question did not.
|
|
|
|
3. **The new block shows the effect map.** Same worked example (a herregistratie submit with
|
|
its optimistic `begin`/`confirm`/`rollback`), expressed as a registration:
|
|
|
|
```ts
|
|
private store = createStore<WizardState, WizardMsg>(initial, reduce, {
|
|
Submitting: async (s, store) => { … },
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Keep the numbered inline comments — they are what makes the block teachable.
|
|
|
|
4. **State the two properties the old idiom lacked**, because they are the reason for the
|
|
change and a reader should see them:
|
|
- Entering the state runs the effect. A `dispatch` cannot silently skip it.
|
|
- Double-submit protection is structural: the effect fires only on a tag **transition**, so
|
|
a second `Submit` while already submitting is a reducer no-op and fires nothing.
|
|
|
|
5. **Document the `Seed` exemption where the idiom is taught**, in one sentence: a mount or
|
|
restore message must not trigger a submit. That is the non-obvious part of the rule, and
|
|
`store.ts` explains it in full for anyone who needs more.
|
|
|
|
6. **Fix `ARCHITECTURE.md:574`'s write walkthrough** too — it opens with `runIfSubmitting()
|
|
(§2d) → createSubmitChangeRequest`. Replace the first hop with the effect map. Leave the
|
|
rest of §6a alone: **RD-31 rewrites that section**, including its stale `L<n>` citations and
|
|
two dead file paths. Touch only the `runIfSubmitting` hop here.
|
|
|
|
7. **Drop the `submitHerregistratie(...)` call from both blocks.** That module no longer
|
|
exists (`submit-herregistratie.ts` was deleted). Use `draftSync.submit(...)`, which is what
|
|
the two herregistratie wizards actually call today.
|
|
|
|
## Files
|
|
|
|
- `docs/reference/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md` (§2d block, and the one hop at :574)
|
|
- `docs/reference/fp-tea-atomic-design.md` (the block at 336-350)
|
|
|
|
No code files. No `.hbs`. No `SKILL.md`.
|
|
|
|
## Steps
|
|
|
|
1. Rewrite `ARCHITECTURE.md` §2d's code block per decisions 3-5.
|
|
2. Fix the first hop of the write walkthrough at :574 per decision 6.
|
|
3. Rewrite the equivalent block in `fp-tea-atomic-design.md` per decisions 3-5 and 7.
|
|
4. Update this ticket's `Status:` to `done` and the README's RD-09 row to `done`.
|
|
5. Commit all of it together.
|
|
|
|
## Acceptance criteria
|
|
|
|
The deleted idiom is no longer taught anywhere:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
grep -rn "runIfSubmitting\|runIfIndienen" docs/ apps/ libs/ .claude/ # MUST return nothing
|
|
grep -rn "submitHerregistratie" docs/ # MUST return nothing
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Every code identifier the new blocks name must exist:
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
grep -n "StoreEffects\|effects?" libs/shared/src/application/store.ts # the API is real
|
|
grep -rn "draftSync.submit" apps/ssp | head -3 # the call is real
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
npm run ci # exits 0
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Verification
|
|
|
|
`npm run ci`. This ticket touches only two Markdown files under `docs/reference/`, so
|
|
`--full` is not required — neither is globbed by Storybook.
|
|
|
|
Read both rewritten blocks end to end and check a reader could follow them without opening
|
|
`store.ts`. That is the actual acceptance test for a teaching document, and no command
|
|
checks it.
|
|
|
|
## Out of scope
|
|
|
|
- The rest of `ARCHITECTURE.md` §6a — its stale `L<n>` line citations, its two non-existent
|
|
file paths, and its post-RD-16 `parseDashboardView` claim. **RD-31.**
|
|
- `fp-tea-atomic-design.md`'s 11 broken pre-monorepo `src/app/…` paths and its broken anchor.
|
|
**RD-32.**
|
|
- `plop-templates/form-machine.hbs` and `.claude/skills/form-machine/SKILL.md` (decision 1).
|
|
- CLAUDE.md. **RD-33.**
|
|
|
|
## Risks
|
|
|
|
- **Do not chase the other staleness in these two files.** Both are also targets of RD-31 and
|
|
RD-32. Editing their line citations or paths here creates a conflict with those tickets for
|
|
no gain. Change only what teaches the submit idiom.
|
|
- **`fp-tea-atomic-design.md`'s surrounding paths are already broken** (they use the
|
|
pre-monorepo `src/app/…` prefix). Leaving them broken in this commit is correct — RD-32 owns
|
|
them. Do not half-fix the file.
|
|
- **Prettier formats Markdown.** Run `npx prettier --write` on both files, or `format:check`
|
|
fails.
|