Three how-it-works/how-to-extend reference docs (docs/reference/), each with a coupling section, indexed in docs/README.md. New document-feature skill so docs ship in the same diff as the code. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
69 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
69 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
# Audit log (authz / PII-reveal trail) — how it's built & extended
|
|
|
|
A persisted, **data-minimised** trail of authorization decisions and sensitive reveals.
|
|
By construction it **never** records a name, BSN, or the revealed value — only _that_ a
|
|
decision happened, on what kind of resource, and its outcome. Built in WP-41 (persisted
|
|
backend) and surfaced by WP-42 (privacy/security showcase); it backs
|
|
[PRD-0002 — ABAC](../project/prd/0002-attribute-based-access-control.md) §8.
|
|
|
|
## The one rule: one producer hub, not scattered logging
|
|
|
|
Every audited event flows through a **single** helper — `AuditAuthz(…)` in `Program.cs`.
|
|
It writes the log line _and_ persists the row. Endpoints don't hand-roll audit records;
|
|
they call the hub. That's what keeps the "never log PII" guarantee enforceable in one place
|
|
instead of trusting every call site.
|
|
|
|
## Layered pipeline
|
|
|
|
Backend:
|
|
|
|
- `Data/AuthzAuditStore.cs` — `AuthzAuditEntry (At, Action, Resource, Decision, Role,
|
|
CorrelationId)` + `Record(…)` / `List()` (newest-first). No PII column — a reflection
|
|
test asserts the schema stays that way.
|
|
- `Data/AppDbContext.cs` — `AuthzAudit` DbSet + migration (persists to SQLite, WP-22).
|
|
- `Program.cs`: `AuditAuthz(…)` (the hub, ~line 590) is called on every authz denial and on
|
|
the BIG-nummer reveal/step-up; `GET /admin/audit` (read) is gated by `CasesAdmin`.
|
|
|
|
Frontend (`src/app/beheer/`):
|
|
|
|
- `domain/audit-entry.ts` → `infrastructure/audit.adapter.ts` (`list()` + `parseAuditEntries`
|
|
boundary) → `application/audit.store.ts` (root singleton, `RemoteData`, **read-only**) →
|
|
`ui/audit.page.ts` (read-only table, gated on `cases:manage`, loads via a guarded `effect`
|
|
once the capability resolves).
|
|
|
|
## How to audit a new action
|
|
|
|
You do **not** touch the frontend. In the backend, at the decision point, call the hub:
|
|
|
|
```csharp
|
|
AuditAuthz(ctx, action: "flags:manage", resource: key, decision: "deny");
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Use a short stable `action` slug and a **non-PII** `resource` identifier (an id or table
|
|
name, never a name/BSN). The admin table picks it up automatically.
|
|
|
|
## Coupling
|
|
|
|
Deep-linked on the **producer** side by design, self-contained on the consumer side:
|
|
|
|
- **Consumer coupling: near zero.** The audit store is read by exactly one page; no other
|
|
component depends on it.
|
|
- **Producer coupling: centralized, not scattered.** Many endpoints call `AuditAuthz`
|
|
(stamdata/cases/flags denials, org-template edits, reveal-bignummer) — but all through
|
|
the one hub, so it's a spoke-and-hub, not logic sprinkled across the codebase. Extend by
|
|
calling the hub; never inline a new audit write.
|
|
|
|
## Wire-up gotchas (both bit WP-41)
|
|
|
|
- Add the read endpoint to the `role.interceptor` **ROLE_AWARE** list
|
|
(`/api/v1/admin/audit`) or it 403s silently with no `X-Role` header.
|
|
- The admin nav entry lives in `ADMIN_LINKS`, gated on `cases:manage`.
|
|
|
|
## See also
|
|
|
|
- [PRD-0002 — ABAC](../project/prd/0002-attribute-based-access-control.md) §8 — the audit requirement.
|
|
- [WP-41](../project/backlog/WP-41-persisted-authz-audit.md) (persistence), [WP-42](../project/backlog/WP-42-privacy-security-showcase.md) (showcase).
|
|
- `backend/src/BigRegister.Api/Data/AuthzAuditStore.cs` — the no-PII schema.
|
|
- `src/app/beheer/ui/audit.page.ts` — the read-only view.
|
|
- [Roles & access](roles-and-access.md) — `cases:manage` + admin gating.
|