fix(e2e): assert the register record where a real approval happens (refs #149)
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m19s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m24s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 2m57s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 6m7s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Successful in 7m49s

verify-domain was the wrong home for the assertion, and CI was right to fail it.
That check completes the Beoordelen task straight through Flowable REST — on
purpose, it exists to exercise the Workflow Client's REST contract — which
bypasses the domain `decide` path that calls the ACL. No approval reached the
ACL there, so no record was ever written.

The Playwright happy path is the only check that drives a real approval
(behandel portal → BFF → domain → ACL), and it already knows its own reference.
Assert there instead: exactly one RegisterRecord for that reference,
INGESCHREVEN, carrying nothing outside the public-safe schema. Drops
register-record-check.py and the verify-domain block.

The helper was run under real Playwright against a live Objecten before
committing — one record found, none for an unknown reference.
This commit is contained in:
not
2026-08-14 10:43:34 +02:00
parent 10b784cc05
commit 2d783448b7
5 changed files with 67 additions and 135 deletions
@@ -153,10 +153,16 @@ and no service reaches Objecten's database.
## Verification
`verify-domain` (`infra/run-domain-check.sh`) drives a real approval end-to-end and then
asserts, via `infra/register-record-check.py`, that Objecten holds exactly one
`RegisterRecord` for that registration, with status `INGESCHREVEN` and no field outside
the public-safe schema.
The end-to-end assertion lives in the Playwright happy path
(`tests/e2e/registration.spec.ts`, run by `verify-e2e`): after the behandelaar approves and
the openbaar register shows `INGESCHREVEN`, it asserts Objecten holds exactly one
`RegisterRecord` for *that* reference, with status `INGESCHREVEN` and no field outside the
public-safe schema.
It belongs there and not in `verify-domain`, which looks like the obvious home: that check
completes the Beoordelen task straight through Flowable REST (deliberately — it exists to
exercise the Workflow Client's REST contract), which bypasses the domain `decide` path that
calls the ACL. The e2e is the only check that drives a real approval.
`ObjectenGatewayIntegrationTests` (`Category=Integration`, so it runs under `verify-acl`
inside the compose network) drives the real gateway against a live Objecten + Objecttypen
+7 -4
View File
@@ -16,11 +16,14 @@ approval updates the existing object instead of creating a second one.
# 1. Bring the stack up (Objecten, Objecttypen and the RegisterRecord objecttype come with it).
make up
#
# 2. End-to-end: the domain check submits a registration, walks it to Beoordelen, approves it, and
# then asserts Objecten holds exactly one RegisterRecord for *that* registration:
make verify-domain # → "OK — approval wrote the register record to Objecten: id=… status=INGESCHREVEN reference=…"
# 2. End-to-end: the walking-skeleton e2e submits, approves via the behandel portal, and then
# asserts Objecten holds exactly one RegisterRecord for *that* registration:
make verify-e2e # → "DigiD submit → … → behandelaar goedkeurt → public INGESCHREVEN"
#
# 3. See it for yourself — every register record currently in Objecten:
# 3. The ACL integration test proves the same writes against a live Objecten (upsert stays one object):
make verify-acl # → "Writes a register record and updates it in place on a second write"
#
# 4. See it for yourself — every register record currently in Objecten:
curl -s -H 'Authorization: Token 1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef12345678' \
-H 'Accept-Crs: EPSG:4326' \
'http://localhost:8021/api/v2/objects' | python3 -m json.tool
-96
View File
@@ -1,96 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""S-19a (#149): prove the approval path wrote the register record to Objecten.
Given the registration whose Beoordelen task the caller just completed with `goedkeuren`, assert
that Objecten holds exactly one RegisterRecord object for it, with status INGESCHREVEN and the
registration's reference — i.e. the ACL's Objecten hop ran, the record validates against the
objecttype schema (Objecten rejects a mismatch), and it carries no personal data (ADR-0027/0028).
Stdlib only so it runs in a bare python:3-slim container on the compose network.
"""
import json
import os
import sys
import time
import urllib.error
import urllib.parse
import urllib.request
OBJECTTYPEN = os.environ["OBJECTTYPEN"] # http://<ip>:8000
OBJECTTYPEN_TOKEN = os.environ["OBJECTTYPEN_TOKEN"]
OBJECTEN = os.environ["OBJECTEN"] # http://<ip>:8000
OBJECTEN_TOKEN = os.environ["OBJECTEN_TOKEN"]
REFERENCE = os.environ["REGISTRATION_REFERENCE"]
TIMEOUT = int(os.environ.get("REGISTER_RECORD_TIMEOUT", "60"))
NAME = "RegisterRecord"
# The register is world-readable: a record must never carry anything identifying (ADR-0027).
ALLOWED_FIELDS = {"id", "status", "reference"}
def get(base, token, path, crs=False):
headers = {"Authorization": f"Token {token}"}
if crs:
headers["Accept-Crs"] = "EPSG:4326"
req = urllib.request.Request(f"{base}{path}", headers=headers)
with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=10) as r:
return json.load(r)
def objecttype_url():
"""The RegisterRecord objecttype URL, or None while registerrecord-init has yet to run."""
ots = get(OBJECTTYPEN, OBJECTTYPEN_TOKEN, "/api/v2/objecttypes").get("results", [])
match = next((o for o in ots if o.get("name") == NAME), None)
return match["url"] if match else None
def check():
"""Return (ok, detail). Raises on transport errors so the caller can retry."""
type_url = objecttype_url()
if not type_url:
return False, f"no objecttype named {NAME!r} in Objecttypen yet"
query = urllib.parse.urlencode({"type": type_url, "data_attrs": f"reference__exact__{REFERENCE}"})
results = get(OBJECTEN, OBJECTEN_TOKEN, f"/api/v2/objects?{query}", crs=True).get("results", [])
if not results:
return False, f"no RegisterRecord object with reference {REFERENCE}"
if len(results) > 1:
# The ACL upserts, so a replayed approval must update rather than duplicate (§8.6).
return False, f"{len(results)} RegisterRecord objects for reference {REFERENCE} — the write is not idempotent"
data = (results[0].get("record") or {}).get("data") or {}
if data.get("status") != "INGESCHREVEN":
return False, f"record status is {data.get('status')!r}, expected 'INGESCHREVEN'"
if not data.get("id"):
return False, "record carries no id (the zaak the projection keys on)"
extra = set(data) - ALLOWED_FIELDS
if extra:
return False, f"record leaks non-public fields: {sorted(extra)}"
return True, f"id={data['id']} status={data['status']} reference={data['reference']}"
def main():
deadline = time.time() + TIMEOUT
detail = "no attempt"
while time.time() < deadline:
try:
ok, detail = check()
if ok:
print(f"OK — approval wrote the register record to Objecten: {detail}")
return 0
except urllib.error.HTTPError as e:
# A 4xx is us, not a cold start — retrying just hides the reason until the deadline.
# (A rejected objecttype URL shows up here as a 400 with a very specific body.)
body = e.read().decode(errors="replace")[:400]
if e.code < 500:
print(f"FAIL — HTTP {e.code} from {e.url}: {body}", file=sys.stderr)
return 1
detail = f"HTTP {e.code}: {body}"
except (urllib.error.URLError, ConnectionError, TimeoutError) as e:
detail = f"transport: {e}"
time.sleep(3)
print(f"FAIL — {detail}", file=sys.stderr)
return 1
if __name__ == "__main__":
sys.exit(main())
-30
View File
@@ -142,36 +142,6 @@ still="$(printf '%s' "$resp" | task_for_reg "$reg_id")"
[ -z "$still" ] || { echo "FAIL — Beoordelen task $still still active after completion" >&2; exit 1; }
echo "OK — behandelaar claimed and completed the Beoordelen task; the registratie process finished"
# ── S-19a: the same approval also wrote the canonical register record to Objecten (ADR-0028).
# Assert it for THIS registration (matched on its reference) rather than "some INGESCHREVEN record":
# the shared verify stack carries records from earlier runs. The container-name filters are anchored
# on the compose replica suffix so they don't also match objecten-db / objecttypen-db.
#
# Unlike every other check here, these two are reached by SERVICE NAME, not container IP. Objecttypen
# echoes the request Host into the objecttype `url`, and Objecten only accepts the objecttype URL that
# matches its configured api_root (http://objecttypen:8000/api/v2/) — an IP-addressed lookup yields a
# URL Objecten rejects with 400 (ADR-0028). Compose DNS resolves both names on this network, and
# neither request has OpenZaak's URL-validity constraint.
echo ">> asserting the approval wrote the register record to Objecten (S-19a)"
obj="$(docker ps -q --filter 'name=objecten[-_][0-9]+$' | head -1)"
objt="$(docker ps -q --filter 'name=objecttypen[-_][0-9]+$' | head -1)"
[ -n "$obj" ] || { echo "FAIL — no running objecten container" >&2; exit 1; }
[ -n "$objt" ] || { echo "FAIL — no running objecttypen container" >&2; exit 1; }
rr="$(docker create --network "$net" \
-e "OBJECTEN=http://objecten:8000" \
-e "OBJECTEN_TOKEN=${OBJECTEN_TOKEN:-1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef12345678}" \
-e "OBJECTTYPEN=http://objecttypen:8000" \
-e "OBJECTTYPEN_TOKEN=${OBJECTTYPEN_TOKEN:-0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567}" \
-e "REGISTRATION_REFERENCE=$reg_id" \
python:3-slim python /register-record-check.py)"
docker cp "$here/register-record-check.py" "$rr:/register-record-check.py" >/dev/null
rr_rc=0; docker start -a "$rr" || rr_rc=$?
docker rm -f "$rr" >/dev/null
if [ "$rr_rc" -ne 0 ]; then
acl="$(docker ps -q --filter 'name=[-_]acl[-_]' | head -1)"
[ -n "$acl" ] && { echo "--- acl log ---" >&2; docker logs "$acl" 2>&1 | tail -20 >&2; }
exit "$rr_rc"
fi
# ── S-11: withdrawal. A second registration parks at Beoordelen; the citizen withdraws it via the
# domain, which delivers the RegistratieIngetrokken message to the task's execution, tripping the
+50 -1
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test';
import { expect, request, test } from '@playwright/test';
// Walking-skeleton happy path (S-08d + S-09 + S-09b + S-12 + S-10a): a zorgprofessional logs in via
// mock DigiD and submits through the self-service portal → BFF → domain; the entry appears in the
@@ -109,4 +109,53 @@ test('DigiD submit → public INGEDIEND → documenten → behandelaar goedkeurt
return staff.getByRole('row', { name: reference }).getByRole('cell', { name: 'INGESCHREVEN' }).count();
}, { timeout: 30_000, intervals: [1_000, 2_000, 3_000, 5_000] })
.toBeGreaterThan(0);
// S-19a: the same approval also wrote the canonical register record to Objecten (ADR-0028).
// Asserted here rather than in verify-domain because this is the only check that drives a *real*
// approval — verify-domain completes the Beoordelen task straight through Flowable REST, which
// bypasses the domain `decide` path that calls the ACL.
const records = await registerRecordsFor(reference);
// Matched on OUR reference: the verify stack is shared and holds records from earlier checks.
expect(records, `expected exactly one RegisterRecord for ${reference}`).toHaveLength(1);
expect(records[0].status).toBe('INGESCHREVEN');
// The register is world-readable, so the record must carry nothing but the public-safe fields
// (ADR-0027) — Objecten's own schema validation enforces this, and this proves it end to end.
expect(Object.keys(records[0]).sort()).toEqual(['id', 'reference', 'status']);
});
const OBJECTEN = process.env.OBJECTEN_URL ?? 'http://objecten:8000';
const OBJECTTYPEN = process.env.OBJECTTYPEN_URL ?? 'http://objecttypen:8000';
const OBJECTEN_TOKEN = process.env.OBJECTEN_TOKEN ?? '1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef12345678';
const OBJECTTYPEN_TOKEN = process.env.OBJECTTYPEN_TOKEN ?? '0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567';
/**
* The RegisterRecord objects Objecten holds for a registration reference.
*
* The objecttype is resolved by name rather than pinned: Objecttypen echoes the request Host into
* the objecttype `url`, and Objecten only accepts the one matching its configured api_root — so
* both must be reached by service name, exactly as the ACL reaches them (ADR-0028).
*/
async function registerRecordsFor(reference: string): Promise<Record<string, string>[]> {
const api = await request.newContext();
try {
const types = await api.get(`${OBJECTTYPEN}/api/v2/objecttypes`, {
headers: { Authorization: `Token ${OBJECTTYPEN_TOKEN}` },
});
expect(types.ok(), `Objecttypen returned ${types.status()}`).toBeTruthy();
const objecttype = ((await types.json()).results as { url: string; name: string }[]).find(
(o) => o.name === 'RegisterRecord',
);
if (!objecttype) throw new Error('the RegisterRecord objecttype is not registered in Objecttypen');
const objects = await api.get(`${OBJECTEN}/api/v2/objects`, {
headers: { Authorization: `Token ${OBJECTEN_TOKEN}`, 'Accept-Crs': 'EPSG:4326' },
params: { type: objecttype.url, data_attrs: `reference__exact__${reference}` },
});
expect(objects.ok(), `Objecten returned ${objects.status()}: ${await objects.text()}`).toBeTruthy();
return ((await objects.json()).results as { record: { data: Record<string, string> } }[]).map(
(o) => o.record.data,
);
} finally {
await api.dispose();
}
}