feat(infra): Objecten publishes register events to NRC (closes #152) #154

Merged
not merged 4 commits from feat/152-objecten-publishes-to-nrc into main 2026-08-28 10:11:55 +00:00
Contributor

What & why

S-19b-1. A write to the Objecten API now produces a delivered notification on the
objecten kanaal in Open Notificaties. ADR-0028 switched Objecten's notifications off on
purpose — there was no broker, worker, kanaal or abonnement, so wiring only the client side
would have dropped every message on the floor. This slice builds the real path and turns it
back on.

  • objecten-celery worker (mirrors oz-celery) + CELERY_BROKER_URL/RESULT_BACKEND on
    objecten-redis db 1 (db 0 is already the cache). notifications_api_common only queues
    the send; without a worker every register write is silently undelivered.
  • nrc service + notifications_config in Objecten's setup_configuration, reusing the
    big-reference-seed credential OpenZaak publishes with (NRC authorizes it via OpenZaak's
    AC, which grants it heeft_alle_autorisaties — no second credential needed).
  • The objecten kanaal in NRC's setup_configuration. The name is fixed by the Objects API
    (NOTIFICATIONS_KANAAL), not chosen here; publishing to an unregistered kanaal is exactly
    what the red check reported first.
  • NOTIFICATIONS_DISABLED: "false" in both compose files.
  • Writers address Objecten as objecten.local — see Notes for reviewers.
  • make verify-objecten-notifications — registers an abonnement on objecten pointing at a
    throwaway sink, writes a RegisterRecord exactly as the ACL does on approval, asserts the
    delivery. One assertion covering the whole chain: Objecten -> objecten-celery -> NRC ->
    nrc-beat -> callback. Wired into the CI verify-stack job and the summary table.

ADR-0029 records the decisions; ADR-0028's ceiling now points at it.

Closes #152

Definition of Done

  • Linked Gitea issue (above).
  • Failing test committed before the implementation (dc9ca2c, red at the first hop:
    NRC POST /api/v1/abonnement -> 400 "Kanaal met deze naam bestaat niet.").
  • Implementation makes the test pass (4488962, + two fixes found by CI, below).
  • Conventional Commits referencing the issue (refs #152).
  • CI green — all six jobs on a5fd47e, including verify-stack end to end (e2e included).
  • docker compose up from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes
    (verify-stack's bring-up step).
  • Docs updated — ADR-0029 added, ADR-0028's ceiling annotated, BACKLOG.md split.
  • ADR added in docs/architecture/.
  • Demo note in docs/demo-script.md if user-visible — n/a, infrastructure only; nothing
    consumes the kanaal until S-19b-2 (#153).

Notes for reviewers

The one genuinely non-obvious bit: writers address Objecten as objecten.local:8000, not
objecten:8000.
NRC types a notification's hoofdObject/resourceUrl as DRF URLField,
so Django's URLValidator runs on them — and it rejects a single-label host. Objecten
fills both from the object url DRF built with request.build_absolute_uri, i.e. the Host
the caller used
. Writing via the plain service name returns 201 and then fails every
publish in the background, forever, with

400 {"hoofdObject":["Voer een geldige URL in."],"resourceUrl":["Voer een geldige URL in."]}

So the objecten service carries an objecten.local network alias and every writer uses it
Acl__Objecten__BaseUrl, ObjectenGatewayIntegrationTests, this slice's verify driver.
An alias rather than a bare dotted SITE_DOMAIN so the host still resolves: a subscriber
following resourceUrl reaches the record, which S-19b-2 will do. Readers keep the plain
name. Same class of constraint as ADR-0028's Objecttypen base-URL rule.

Ceiling, stated in the ADR: nothing enforces the alias — a future writer using
objecten:8000 gets a 201 and silently no notification. If a second writer ever appears,
rename the compose service rather than adding a lint.

Two CI-only failures on the way here, both worth knowing:

  1. SITE_DOMAIN was my first guess at the mechanism and is simply not what builds those
    URLs — dropped in d76abf2.
  2. The check correlated the delivery on the reference inside the record it wrote. An NRC
    notification carries kanaal/resource/kenmerken/hoofdObject/resourceUrl and
    never the record data, so it correlates on the object URL now (a5fd47e).

Cost: one more long-running container on the memory-tight runner. It inherits the capped
UWSGI_PROCESSES: "1" env, which the celery command ignores; if verify-stack gets tight
again, celery concurrency is the next knob.

Follow-up: S-19b-2 (#153) sources the projection from these events. Nothing subscribes to
the objecten kanaal in the product yet — only the verify check does.

## What & why S-19b-1. A write to the Objecten API now produces a **delivered** notification on the `objecten` kanaal in Open Notificaties. ADR-0028 switched Objecten's notifications off on purpose — there was no broker, worker, kanaal or abonnement, so wiring only the client side would have dropped every message on the floor. This slice builds the real path and turns it back on. - `objecten-celery` worker (mirrors `oz-celery`) + `CELERY_BROKER_URL`/`RESULT_BACKEND` on objecten-redis db 1 (db 0 is already the cache). `notifications_api_common` only *queues* the send; without a worker every register write is silently undelivered. - `nrc` service + `notifications_config` in Objecten's `setup_configuration`, reusing the `big-reference-seed` credential OpenZaak publishes with (NRC authorizes it via OpenZaak's AC, which grants it `heeft_alle_autorisaties` — no second credential needed). - The `objecten` kanaal in NRC's `setup_configuration`. The name is fixed by the Objects API (`NOTIFICATIONS_KANAAL`), not chosen here; publishing to an unregistered kanaal is exactly what the red check reported first. - `NOTIFICATIONS_DISABLED: "false"` in both compose files. - Writers address Objecten as `objecten.local` — see *Notes for reviewers*. - `make verify-objecten-notifications` — registers an abonnement on `objecten` pointing at a throwaway sink, writes a `RegisterRecord` exactly as the ACL does on approval, asserts the delivery. One assertion covering the whole chain: Objecten -> objecten-celery -> NRC -> nrc-beat -> callback. Wired into the CI `verify-stack` job and the summary table. **ADR-0029** records the decisions; ADR-0028's ceiling now points at it. Closes #152 ## Definition of Done - [x] Linked Gitea issue (above). - [x] Failing test committed before the implementation (dc9ca2c, red at the first hop: `NRC POST /api/v1/abonnement -> 400 "Kanaal met deze naam bestaat niet."`). - [x] Implementation makes the test pass (4488962, + two fixes found by CI, below). - [x] Conventional Commits referencing the issue (`refs #152`). - [x] CI green — all six jobs on a5fd47e, including `verify-stack` end to end (e2e included). - [x] `docker compose up` from a fresh clone reaches green health checks within 3 minutes (`verify-stack`'s bring-up step). - [x] Docs updated — ADR-0029 added, ADR-0028's ceiling annotated, BACKLOG.md split. - [x] ADR added in `docs/architecture/`. - [x] Demo note in `docs/demo-script.md` if user-visible — n/a, infrastructure only; nothing consumes the kanaal until S-19b-2 (#153). ## Notes for reviewers **The one genuinely non-obvious bit: writers address Objecten as `objecten.local:8000`, not `objecten:8000`.** NRC types a notification's `hoofdObject`/`resourceUrl` as DRF `URLField`, so Django's `URLValidator` runs on them — and it rejects a **single-label** host. Objecten fills both from the object url DRF built with `request.build_absolute_uri`, i.e. *the Host the caller used*. Writing via the plain service name returns 201 and then fails every publish in the background, forever, with ``` 400 {"hoofdObject":["Voer een geldige URL in."],"resourceUrl":["Voer een geldige URL in."]} ``` So the `objecten` service carries an `objecten.local` network alias and every writer uses it — `Acl__Objecten__BaseUrl`, `ObjectenGatewayIntegrationTests`, this slice's verify driver. An alias rather than a bare dotted `SITE_DOMAIN` so the host still *resolves*: a subscriber following `resourceUrl` reaches the record, which S-19b-2 will do. Readers keep the plain name. Same class of constraint as ADR-0028's Objecttypen base-URL rule. **Ceiling, stated in the ADR:** nothing enforces the alias — a future writer using `objecten:8000` gets a 201 and silently no notification. If a second writer ever appears, rename the compose service rather than adding a lint. **Two CI-only failures on the way here**, both worth knowing: 1. `SITE_DOMAIN` was my first guess at the mechanism and is simply not what builds those URLs — dropped in d76abf2. 2. The check correlated the delivery on the `reference` inside the record it wrote. An NRC notification carries `kanaal`/`resource`/`kenmerken`/`hoofdObject`/`resourceUrl` and **never the record data**, so it correlates on the object URL now (a5fd47e). **Cost:** one more long-running container on the memory-tight runner. It inherits the capped `UWSGI_PROCESSES: "1"` env, which the celery command ignores; if `verify-stack` gets tight again, celery concurrency is the next knob. **Follow-up:** S-19b-2 (#153) sources the projection from these events. Nothing subscribes to the `objecten` kanaal in the product yet — only the verify check does.
not added this to the Iteration 4 — Objecten milestone 2026-08-28 08:54:47 +00:00
not added 2 commits 2026-08-28 08:54:47 +00:00
Registers an abonnement on the `objecten` kanaal pointing at the existing
webhook sink, writes a RegisterRecord exactly as the ACL does on approval, and
waits for the delivery. That is the whole publish chain in one assertion:
Objecten → its celery worker → NRC → nrc-beat → the callback.

Fails today at the first hop, which is the point:

  NRC POST /api/v1/abonnement → 400: {"name":"naam","code":"kanaal_naam",
  "reason":"Kanaal met deze naam bestaat niet."}

Also splits S-19b (#150) into #152/#153 in BACKLOG.md — the notification wiring
and the projection re-source are independently deployable (CLAUDE.md §13).
feat(infra): Objecten publishes register events to NRC (refs #152)
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 4m31s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 4m46s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m35s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 4m0s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 6m47s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Failing after 17m35s
448896206f
Builds the four pieces ADR-0028 deliberately left absent, and turns
`NOTIFICATIONS_DISABLED` back off:

- `objecten-celery`, a worker on the Objecten image (mirrors `oz-celery`), plus
  `CELERY_BROKER_URL`/`RESULT_BACKEND` on objecten-redis db 1 (db 0 is the cache).
  Without it `notifications_api_common` queues the send and nothing ever ships it.
- An `nrc` service + `notifications_config` in Objecten's setup_configuration,
  reusing the `big-reference-seed` credential OpenZaak publishes with.
- The `objecten` kanaal in NRC's setup_configuration — the name is fixed by the
  Objects API (`NOTIFICATIONS_KANAAL`), and publishing to an unregistered kanaal is
  what the failing check reported first.
- `SITE_DOMAIN: objecten.local:8000` + an `objecten.local` network alias: NRC
  validates `hoofdObject`/`resourceUrl` with Django's URLValidator, which rejects a
  single-label host, so `objecten:8000` is refused with "Voer een geldige URL in."
  The alias keeps the dotted host resolvable so the URL still dereferences.

ADR-0029 records it; ADR-0028's ceiling now points there.

Makes `make verify-objecten-notifications` (dc9ca2c) pass.
not added the area:infratype:slice labels 2026-08-28 08:55:04 +00:00
not added 1 commit 2026-08-28 09:31:37 +00:00
fix(infra): address Objecten by a dotted host so NRC accepts its notifications (refs #152)
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m24s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m32s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 3m13s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 6m25s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Failing after 8m11s
d76abf2df2
The worker published and NRC answered 400 on every message:

  {"hoofdObject":["Voer een geldige URL in."],"resourceUrl":["Voer een geldige URL in."]}

NRC types both as DRF `URLField`, and Django's URLValidator refuses a single-label host.
Objecten fills them from the object `url` DRF built with `request.build_absolute_uri` —
the Host the *caller* used — so `SITE_DOMAIN` never entered into it. Dropped that env pair;
it was a wrong guess at the mechanism.

The fix is on the caller side: keep the `objecten.local` network alias and point every
writer whose writes must be notified at it — the ACL, the gateway integration tests, and
this slice's verify driver. Readers keep the plain service name.

ADR-0029 updated with the real mechanism and the ceiling it leaves: a new writer using
`objecten:8000` gets a 201 and silently no notification.
not added 1 commit 2026-08-28 09:50:11 +00:00
fix(infra): correlate the delivery on the object URL, not the record reference (refs #152)
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m14s
CI / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m30s
CI / unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m34s
CI / frontend (pull_request) Successful in 3m14s
CI / mutation (pull_request) Successful in 6m21s
CI / verify-stack (pull_request) Successful in 8m48s
a5fd47e546
The publish chain works — the sink received it:

  {"kanaal": "objecten", "resource": "object", "kenmerken": {"objectType": "…"},
   "hoofdObject": "http://objecten.local:8000/api/v2/objects/a68d4c46-…", …}

The check just looked for the wrong thing. An NRC notification carries hoofdObject /
resourceUrl and kenmerken — never the record data — so the `reference` inside the
RegisterRecord it wrote was never going to appear in the delivered message. Grep the sink
for the object URL instead, which is what identifies the write.
not merged commit 2125fb0cfd into main 2026-08-28 10:11:55 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.